« Misleading headlines: Rochester Post Bulletin and The Hill | Main | Afternoon news digest: The millionth acre edition »

January 24, 2008

Comments

Thanks for providing the link to the cartoon. It provides a better understanding.

I must disagree with your assessment that the newspaper should not print the cartoon.

What was your reaction when the Danish newspaper published a several cartoons depicting the Prophet Mohammed that many Muslims found offensive ?

Every year a Pulitzer Prize for Editorial Cartooning is awarded … now Mr. Livingstone may not win it, but he has used his skills to convey a message.

In the spirit of "I Detest What You Say, But I Will Fight to the Death to Preserve Your Right to Say It", the newspaper should not censure the cartoonist.

I am reminded of this tribute to our soldiers :
It is the soldier, not the reporter, Who has given us freedom of the press.
It is the soldier, not the poet, Who has given us freedom of speech.
It is the soldier, not the organizer, Who has given us the freedom to demonstrate.
It is the soldier, Who salutes the flag, Who serves beneath the flag,
And whose coffin is draped by the flag, Who allows the protestor to burn the flag.

In LTE or by canceling subscriptions, people can express their opinion of Mr. Livingstone’s message, but not the editor of the paper.

Newspapers are different than political activists (the Kline/Hogan's Heroes comment) ... candidates will be held accountable by the voters so they must control their messengers.

The comments to this entry are closed.