« Wednesday morning news digest: bellwether friends editions | Main | Agitated? Irritable? Hostile?: WaPo's Milbank on Election Anxiety Disorder »

May 14, 2008

Comments

Oh, my gosh ... somebody's Club for Growth rating will be going down.

What good is a pledge against earmarks, if in the end you vote FOR the legislation that the Club For Growth complains about:
Subsidies to millionaire farmers without a hard, meaningful cap on a farmers qualifying income
The elimination of key limits on annual commodity payments
Spending gimmicks that disguise over $10 billion in spending increases
An increase in subsidy rates despite sky-high crop prices and record farm incomes
Direct payments for crops that are not based on a farmer’s income, crop prices, or any standard of need
The creation of a new, permanent disaster aid program, creating incentives to grow the wrong crops on bad land in bad weather
Tax breaks for special interests like race horse owners and timber companies
[Note: These are Club's complaints not mine.]

AGAINST the bill (and therefore With the Club For Growth)
Jeff Flake (AZ-06)
John Campbell (CA-48)
Jeb Hensarling (TX-05)
John Shadegg (AZ-03)
John Boehner (OH-08)
Tom Price (GA-06)
Lynn Westmoreland (GA-03)
Virginia Foxx (NC-05)
Trent Franks (AZ-02)
Michele Bachmann (MN-06)
Eric Cantor (VA-07)
Patrick McHenry (NC-10)
Paul Ryan (WI-01)
Devin Nunes (CA-21)
Paul Broun (GA-10)
Henry Waxman (CA-30)
Joe Pitts (PA-16)
Mark Kirk (IL-10)
Patrick Tiberi (OH-12)*
Joe Wilson (SC-02)
Ron Kind (WI-03)
Dan Burton (IN-05)
Jim Cooper (TN-05)
Mike Pence (IN-06)
Jim Sensenbrenner (WI-05)
Dave Reichert (WA-08)
Cathy McMorris Rodgers (WA-05)
Marsha Blackburn (TN-07)
Nathan Deal (GA-09)
Judy Biggert (IL-13)
John Linder (GA-07)

FOR the bill (and against the Club For Growth):
John Kline (MN-02)
Marilyn Musgrave (CO-04)
Walter Jones (NC-03)
Louie Gohmert (TX-01)
Michael McCaul (TX-10)
Todd Platts (PA-19)
Mark Udall (CO-02)
Dave Camp (MI-04)*

Also did the Change You Deserve cause a split in the leadership ... with some voting with Club For Growth and some voting for their re-election ?
Republican leadership was split, which is emblematic of the party's vision for the future:

GOP Leader Boehner: NO
GOP Whip Blunt: YES
Conference Chair Putnam: YES
Conference Vice-Chair Granger: NO
Policy Chairman McCotter: YES
Conference Secretary Carter: YES
NRCC Chairman Cole: YES
Chief Deputy Whip Cantor: NO

Earmarks as the Republicans are trying to frame it, is a SHAM !

They talk for public consumption, but when it comes to gutting spending they go wimpy.

I will be watching to see if John Kline has a press release on the bill as well as Ramstad and Bachmann. By Kline refusing to obtain monies for the Second District (and everyone else who uses the highway, hospitals, military units, etc.), he is making a fraudulent case for restraint on spending but in the end voting to let others have their spending.

Transparency and authorization makes sense, but Kline's Holier-than-thou attitude is a SHAM. The Steve Sarvi threat forced him to for the farmers in his district with hopes that will forget that they need good roads to deliver products to market.

Walz did a HONEST, OPEN and Strong Effort on behalf of Minnesota.

The comments to this entry are closed.