The winning Powerball ticket is held by a middle-aged couple in Waseca County. Congratulations to them. The bad news in Waseca: Another life lost on Highway 14.
In
Subsidies at center of fight over farm bill, the Albert Lea Tribune covers the final battles over the Farm Bill. Reporter Sarah Kirchner quotes both Senator Coleman and Congressman Walz in the article:
Farm subsidies, alternative fuels and nutrition are at the top of the
list of the constantly changing 2008 farm bill being discussed in
Congress, but the No. 1 concern is the president’s threat to veto if
there isn’t enough subsidy reform.
“It’s not everything the
president wants, but it’s moving in the right direction,” Republican
Sen. Norm Coleman told the Tribune. “This bill is important for so many
Minnesota farmers and producers it would be a mistake to veto it.” . . .
. . .Coleman said he talked with the White House Wednesday and Thursday, and
he made it clear it would be a mistake to veto the farm bill.
“You don’t kill a farm bill because you don’t get everything you want. In the end, it’s about compromise,” he said. . . .
. . .Early last week, the House and the Senate
agreed on a tentative $300 billion framework for the farm bill,
according to Rep. Tim Walz’s office. Currently the bill is being
debated in conference committee due to many unresolved issues.
The
conference committee is hoping to reach a compromise between the
administration, the House and the Senate, with the goal of passing the
farm bill and placing it on the president’s desk this week, according
to Walz’s office.
However, the president is still threatening to veto unless the bill includes what he wants.
“It’s either his way or no way,” Walz, a Democrat serving on the Agriculture Committee, said. “That’s making it very difficult.”
When
it comes to reforming the farmer subsidies, farmers in 2009 with
nonfarm income more than $750,000 will not receive subsidies, Walz said
Thursday. Each consecutive year, the income cap to receive subsidies
will drop.
However, the Bush administration suggested an income cap of $200,000 for farmers receiving subsidies.
Any
farmers with an income more than $950,000 are phased out of subsidies
in the current bill, and Walz said the new bill has closed loopholes.
Another
reform in the bill comes in the form of direct attribution of farm
subsidy payments so no “double-dipping” is done, Coleman said.
“We
think we’ve done a good job of adding some of the reform we could get,”
Walz said, adding some of the farmers are using the extra income for
conservation enhancements.
Both Coleman and Walz said more
reform has been made to the subsidy section of the farm bill than there
ever has been before, but it still isn’t good enough. Walz said
President Bush is looking for fiscal responsibility.
“Nobody here is buying that, and that includes the Republicans,” he said.
While
subsidies are the hot topic with the farm bill, Coleman said 65 percent
of the bill is for food. That includes a $10 billion boost for
nutrition.
Walz said there is more new money for the nutrition
program than the other parts of the bill put together. This includes
more funding for food banks and food assistance programs.
The
recent farm bill also includes legislation making it the largest
commitment to conservation than any other Congress has made, Coleman
said.
Several
billion dollars, according to Walz, are going into renewable fuels with
incentives for cellulosic ethanol — which uses more of the corn stalk
than alcohol from the kernel.
The 2008 farm bill includes
beginner farmer/rancher legislation to help new operations get started
and a fresh fruit and vegetable initiative for school meals.
With
all the parts and pieces adding up, Walz said he thinks the farm bill
is a good bill, and it should go through. Both sides of the aisle have
worked together making bipartisan efforts to get the bill through,
Coleman said.
Both congressmen said the numbers are there to override a presidential veto, if it comes to that.
Kirchner's article has also been published in the Austin Daily Herald.
In the Rochester Post-Bulletin online opinion section, there's a rousing debate over energy policy going on. The editorial board says that Voters can see through politicians' gas-tax ploys. Letter writers sound off in response to last week's oped piece by the GOP's endorsed congressional candidate in Davis should re-think ideas on oil and Stop thinking that oil is the answer.
The Mankato Free Press editorial board agrees .
The Rothenberg Political Report: Open Season in 2010 mentions Congressman Walz as a possible gubernatorial candidate in 2010:
Minnesota Rep. Tim Walz (D) is focused on re-election this cycle to his
1st district seat, but he’s also mentioned as a future gubernatorial
candidate. Walz was swept in with the Democratic wave of 2006,
defeating then-Rep. Gil Gutknecht (R) with 53 percent, in a district
that Bush carried by 4 points. Former Sen. Mark Dayton (D) is also
mentioned as a potential gubernatorial candidate in 2010.
So are Tarryl Clark, R.T. Rybak, Margaret Kelliher, Chris Coleman, Tommy Rukavina and many others. The DFL bench is growing.
We have to admit: blogging here at Bluestem will be light while we
work on some projects or head out to catch the North American warbler
migration. The latter is one of the great ornithological events on the
planet. Tiny birds, males now in their bright spring feathers, fly
north from Mexico, Central and South America to their breeding grounds.
Often, that means Canada, but they'll dawdle in treetops and brush on
the way there.
Early yesterday evening, we saw the usual yellow-rumps, a Northern Waterthrush, Nashville and palm warblers, but few cerulean warblers as well. Another genus of neo-tropical, the summer resident rose-breasted grosbeak, was carrying on in the trees.
These folks have the goods on recently seen birds, and it's hard not to heed their sightings and head out. Later!
Photo: A yellow-rumped warbler.