The Winona Daily News looks at top stories in its area for 2006. Here's the write-up for politics:
Walz unseats Gutknecht
Tim Walz, the fiery-yet-affable
teacher from Mankato, became the poster child of the Democrats’ sweep
of both the U.S. House and Senate in the November midterm elections
when he ousted six-term incumbent Congressman Gil Gutknecht,
R-Rochester, in a close race that most pollsters and pundits ignored
until September.
Within the state Legislature, DFLers widened
their majority in the Senate and re-captured a majority in the House.
The House takeover was marked by a number of tight DFL victories over
long-time Republicans, including La Crescent Rep.-elect Ken Tschumper’s
52-vote win over Rep. Greg Davids, an eight-term Republican from
Preston.
Of the five state legislators who will represent Winona
and the surrounding area in 2007-08, four are Democrats. Prior to the
November elections, three of the five were Republicans.
Minnesota Central: Best and worst list
McPherson Hall, whose Minnesota Central blog had been quiet for a while, reflects on the political year.
Mankato Free Press: Tim Penny's radio show
Our fiscally moderate friend at Minnesota Central is a big fan of former representative Tim Penny. The Mankato Free Press reports on Penny's radio show, broadcast from Waseca's KOWZ.
After a long stint in politics, Tim Penny has
discovered you don’t have to be in elective office to examine the
issues and make a difference.
In Waseca, the 55-year-old
former congressman is asking the questions he thinks people want
answered as host of the weekly radio show It’s Your Call on KOWZ-AM
1170.
A few minutes before 11 a.m. on a recent
Friday morning with coffee cup in hand, Penny climbs the steps to the
cramped radio studio of KOWZ in the back of the Nelson Realty building
in downtown Waseca.
“I try to ask the questions I’ve heard
people asking around town,” Penny said. He invites a variety of local
people to answer those questions on the air.
Since his first show in September, past and
present government officials, the heads of organizations, high school
students and other local notables have shared the microphone.
During a recent program, Penny shook hands
with his radio guest, jotted a few notes on the back of his mail and
adjusted the microphone, waiting for his cue from Bob White, the
station’s sports director.
Chuck Noble, a CPA, gave listeners
end-of-the-year income tax tips, prompted by a few questions from
Penny. Mayor Roy Srp filled in the rest of the hour. Penny describes
his radio slot as “somewhat political but low key.” While he tries not
to throw softballs, Penny also notes he doesn’t set his guests up for a
“gotcha” interview.
“I like the interviewing techniques Gary Eichten on (Minnesota) Public Radio uses,” Penny said. . . .
The show is being considered for a statewide audience.
Worthington Daily Globe: Swift & Co coverage
A fascinating pair of articles in today's Worthington Daily Globe. One chronicles the contributions Swift & Co. makes to the Worthington area; the other looks at the effects on Worthington of a long-term decline in real wages in the meat packing industry. Reporter Julie Buntjer wrote the pieces.
In Being a good neighbor?, Buntjer notes:
Throughout the course of the past two weeks — since Immigration and
Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials conducted a sweep of Worthington’s
Swift & Co. plant in search of identity thieves and illegal
immigrants — comments regarding Swift’s impact on the community have
been easy to come by. Yet the topic often overlooked in those
conversations on the street or in letters to the editor are positives
that Swift has brought to the region.
[snip]
More than just the name has changed at the Worthington facility in
those 42 years, and that’s clear simply by driving past the plant on
the northeast corner of town. Remodeling and expansion projects over
the years — the latest completed in 2004 — have taken the company to
new heights in Worthington. Today, Swift has 2,300 employees and an
annual payroll of $64 million with two full production shifts and a
third shift to conduct maintenance, clean-up and rendering.
Thanks
to advancements in technology and expanded space, Swift today can
process 1,100 hogs per hour — nearly four times per hour than when the
plant first opened. Efficiencies in processing have opened the doors to
the region’s pork producers to grow the steady supply of animals needed
to keep the plant in operation.
“All of our hogs are purchased
from within a 200-mile radius of the plant,” said Andersen-Martinez,
adding that the company’s most recent data shows $661 million being
paid per year to those pork producers. “That $661 million is 4.4
million hogs (processed) per year.”
The plant needs more than just pigs to remain in business, and that brings in an entire realm of economic benefits.
From
Jan. 1, 2005 through Nov. 2006, Swift & Co. contributed nearly 30
percent of the share of the retail electric revenues taken in by
Worthington Public Utilities. During that same time period, the
company’s water fees made up close to 40 percent of the total water
revenues taken in by the utility, according to WPU director Scott Hain.
[snip]
With a $64 million payroll, $661 million paid to local pork
producers, $5.3 million paid in utilities, $6.3 million in state and
federal withholding and $1.2 million in property and vehicle taxes,
Andersen-Martinez said those dollars multiply throughout the region.
According to RIMS (Regional Input-Output Modeling System) multipliers,
Worthington’s Swift & Co. can be attributed to the creation of
14,000 additional jobs — above and beyond those within the plant — and
another $251 million per year in economic earnings in the region.
Its
employees buy homes here, rent apartments here, buy groceries and
supplies in local stores and support community causes. According to
Sean McHugh, spokesperson for Swift & Co.’s headquarters in
Greeley, Colo., the Worthington plant provided more than $47,000 in
cash and in-kind support for organizations including the local food
shelves, Hospice Cottage and the Worthington Area United Way — as well
as a special $52,000 contribution to support families of the ICE
investigation. In addition, employees contributed $12,200 for the
American Cancer Society’s Nobles County Relay for Life in 2006; and
$52,200 for the Worthington Area United Way during the 2005 campaign.
Another side of the story in the companion article, Low wages change face of processing industry:
Some have said that when Swift Independent purchased the former
Armour’s plant in Worthington, so began the town’s demise. Wage
reductions and increased expectations forced people to leave the
processing facility behind — to be replaced by workers willing to do
the job for whatever pay they could get.
Back in 1983, one local man
left his job on the line after 19 years with what he believes was a
relatively good company in Armour’s. The union was strong — it had gone
on strike several times seeking improvements in working conditions and
increased wages — and everyone seemed to get along, whether they were
line workers or office personnel.
Armour’s paid some of the best wages in town back then, and benefits were good, too.
“We
had a waiting list when we worked there of people wanting to come
work,” said the man, who spoke to the Daily Globe on condition of
anonymity.
Teachers would sign up to work for Armour’s during
their summer vacation, and the unemployed would show up each day in
hopes someone called in sick or couldn’t make it into work, he said.
But when Armour’s closed and Swift Independent came in two months
later, the pay being offered was considerably less. It forced many,
including him, to begin a new job search.
When he lost his job
in 1983 due to the closing of Armour’s, he was making $11.75 per hour
on a line that processed 550 hogs per hour. He can’t recall what Swift
Independent was willing to pay, but remembers it was nowhere near the
living wage he’d been earning.
Now, some 23 years and three
changes in ownership later, the starting wage at the pork processing
plant is $11.50 per hour — roughly 30 percent less when considering
inflation — and it is processing 1,100 hogs per hour.
According
to James Mintert, an agricultural economist at Kansas State University,
meatpacking wages once ran 14 to 18 percent above the average
manufacturing wage. Today, the wages are 25 percent below the average
manufacturing hourly rate.
So who, or what, is responsible for the bubble bursting in the food processing business?
Those who have worked in the industry blame it on non-unionized companies.
[snip]
In 1980, about 46 percent of meatpackers were unionized. Today, about 21 percent are, including Worthington’s Swift & Co.
In
Worthington, the inability to find enough people willing to work at the
new, lower wages offered by Swift Independent forced the company to
find new tactics to bring in employees. In the years that followed, a
slow yet steady stream of immigrants — both legal and illegal — came to
town to fill the jobs.
Some may argue that they took jobs away
from local residents, but what many don’t consider is the declining
number of people who want to work in a processing facility. As the
former Armour’s employee pointed out, the work isn’t glamorous.
Employees stand, often in one place, for up to eight or 10 hours a day
on a concrete floor. In addition, their work is repetitious and
typically involves yielding dangerous equipment such as knives or saws.
Today, immigrants make up 50 percent of the workforce, according to data from the United Food and Commercial Workers Union. . . .
Washington invitations
Tim and Gwen Walz invite those who can make it to Washington D.C. on January 4 to a couple of receptions. It's our first duty day for the semester, alas, so we are staying put in Minnesota, but we anticipate Representative Walz's cheerful communication staff will supply details on all the fun.
Rochester Post Bulletin: Interview with Gutknecht
The Post-Bulletin's Ed Felker interviews the Republican leader in Gutknecht reflects on 12 years in the House. In this interview, he attributes his "demise" to the Iraq situation:
Do you still support the president's approach to the war?
A: I'm not sure I know what the president's approach is. One of the
real problems this administration had is they are just miserable
communicators. If they had expressed from the beginning a clear vision,
the American people would have stood behind that vision for a very long
time. But the vision has been somewhat misunderstood, that's the term I
would use. ...
The White House indirectly sowed the seeds, I might say, of my
demise, by things that they did early on that didn't prove to be
correct. Not that they're evil, or whatever, but they didn't think
about the consequences down the road if that wasn't correct. ...
I would put under a bigger umbrella, the whole notion, the whole
theory, and I have to blame (Secretary of State) Condoleezza Rice for
this, the whole theory was that they would be so pleased to be out from
under the yoke of Saddam Hussein that they would put aside their
secular differences and unite behind the banner of secular democracy.
Well, the Iraqi people do want democracy, but they first want justice.
The Sunnis and Shias have scores that they want to settle, and I don't
think we thought through what those scores were and how violent that
could become.
It's easy for me to be critical today because I didn't see that and
didn't understand that. ... I did not understand how deeply rooted the
secular differences were in Iraq, and it would continue to fester and
in some respects flare up 31/2 years later. No one could have predicted
that, I shouldn't say that, no one was predicting that four years ago,
but we certainly understand that today.