If Pine County Commissioner Mitch Pangerl has his way, there will be no electronic sign on land owned by the county because a local LGBT Pride event might use the sign, a group he called a "bad apple."
The Pine County board could have heated meetings in the months ahead, according to one commissioner, if it allows an electronic sign on land owned by the county.
Commissioner Stephen Hallan of Pine City brought forward a request for a group to lease space in front of the old county courthouse in Pine City to advertise community events.
The sign would cost $30,000 and the group would pay for all costs associated with it. Hallan said the fundraising would probably be spearheaded by Kevin Anderson and the Pine City Chamber of Commerce. Hallan said the sign would be used for advertising events such as the Lions pancake breakfast, fishing contests, fair and Arts in the Park.
Fellow Commissioner Mitch Pangerl of Pine City stated he was against the proposed lease of land.
Having an electronic sign in the community has been controversial in the Pine City school system, which formerly had a sign outside the elementary school that was used for community events. In 2000, the sign was erected, with $10,000 coming from the Greater Pine Area Endowment, to promote school and community events.
It was used by more than 20 community groups until this year when Pride in the Park wanted space to promote their event on the sign. Soon thereafter, the school board decided to only use the sign for school events, stating that some members of the public did not support the Pride in the Park message in front of the school.
Pangerl, who said “one bad apple that advertised on that sign,” said he got 30 phone calls on it. The school district, after limiting the message on the sign, refunded the $10,000 donation.
Faust voted to legalize marriage equality last spring, gaining national attention for his moving floor speech, in venues like the Huffington Post.
The East Central Minnesota Pride picnic, which will celebrate its tenth year this summer, is a high profile rural rainbow event. Last summer's entertainment included:
. . . Chastity Brown, a 30-year old Minneapolis-based, internationally-recognized musician who has released three full-length albums and, despite being named “Best Folk Singer” of 2012 in City Pages’ “Best of the Twin Cities,” she straddles multiple genres.
Former Minnesota Viking Esera Tuaolo will also be present to debut release his new smash single “Stronger” on the East Central Minnesota Pride stage. Tuaolo played in the National Football League for nine years and since shocked the world in 2003 with his announcement on HBO REAL SPORTS with Bryant Gumble that he is part of the LGBT community. . . .
Pangerl and others might not like those apples, but tabling a project for a community sign isn't going to stop the fun. There's a worm in Pine County, but it's not the local Pride picnic.
Photo: Mitch Pangerl, 2010.
If you enjoyed reading this post, consider giving a donation via snail mail (P.O. Box 108, Maynard MN 56260) or paypal:
Federal money may not grow on trees for health care, but if it's his own defaulted federal loan? Apparently it's just a little shrubbery to borrow from the federal government for a private business, even if that doesn't work out.
Nienow lent money to campaign while not paying SBA debt down
Curiously enough, Sean Nienow might not have been able to find money to pay his SBA loan or fulfill the money he owed to National Camp Association, Inc, a New York corporation, which received a court judgement for outstanding cash, but he was able to loan his campaign money.
When did Nienow loan his campaign nearly $5000? Looking backward to to 2011, Nienow lent his campaign $4950.00 on December 31, 2011 (mind you that it paid him back ASAP in 2012), according to his 2011 end of year report.
But there's more!
In the 2011 year end report, Nienow's campaign repaid earlier loans from the candidate. A partial loan payment of $990 was made on August 9, 2011, another of $500 on November 14, 2011, and a final partial payment of $900 was made on November 20, 2011 for a total of $2390 repaid for the year.
In the 2010 year end report, Sean Nienow loaned his campaign $4700 on July 19; his employer is listed as the National Camp Association Inc. He repaid the loan on July 21, as well as repaying any earlier loan for $4700 on January 4, 2010. The campaign had two outstanding loan balances as of October 18, 2010: $50 from the candidate on August 5, 2002 and $4900 lent by the candidate on December 30, 2005.
“The defendants ceased making payments on or about July 28, 2010, and the Note has not been repaid,” the suit said. “Defendants have defaulted under the terms and conditions of the Note by failing to repay said Note.”
Apparently Nienow found $4700 to loan his campaign on July 19 and got it back of July 21, but didn't direct that cash toward his outstanding balance with the SBA. Did he hoard it until lending it once again to the campaign committee?
The two loans at $4950, along with a December 31, 2009, loan from the candidate of $4700, are listed on his committee's 2009 year end report.
Earlier campaign finance reports do not fall within the period of the contract to buy the assets of National Camp Associatio, Inc. of New York or of the SBA loan.
Nienow does seem to have managed to loaned money to his campaign--and gotten it back--even as he wasn't paying on his loan and contract. Money doesn't grow on trees, after all.
Photo: Sean Nienow. He's not up for re-election until 2016, so maybe everybody will forget this by then.
If you enjoyed reading this post, consider giving a donation via snail mail (P.O. Box 108, Maynard MN 56260) or paypal:
There's a lovely story in the most recent issue of the Red Wing Republican Eagle about the respect that "quiet strength" and "fight for truth" earned for a city resident deeply involved in environmental education and human rights for LGBT people.
From that most main street of organizations, the Kiwanis.
When Bruce Ause went to Thursday’s Noontime Kiwanis meeting, he thought he was there to help talk about the early years of the Environmental Learning Center. Instead, he was honored for his work with the ELC and other community involvement when he was named the 2013 Red Wing Neighbor of the Year.
He was chosen from a handful of nominees and stood out for getting the ELC off the ground, work at the state Capitol and locally for Red Wing PFLAG, and his “quiet strength” and fight for truth, Kiwanis members said.
A google search returns a couple thousand hits on his name, and the Red Wing Republican Eagle story condenses that record into a life spent changing people's minds:
In his work with PFLAG, Ause has been “fighting for equality when it’s not very popular,” Leise said.
“He’s one of the few people who can change people’s minds,” she said. “By changing minds, you can change a community.”
Ause said his work with PFLAG has been aimed at curbing discrimination, which he said many people can’t fully understand until they’ve experienced it.
“I am most appreciative of the fact that Minnesota is leading the country in respect and dignity for those that are different,” he said.
Ause began working with the Environmental Learning Center when it started in 1970, seeking "to make a difference one kid at a time,” Killey reports. Ause was also speaking up in April, 2011 about the need to scrutinize industrial scale frac sand mining, according to an Associated Press report, SE Minn. Could Become Hotbed For ‘Frac Sand’. While most people were still babbling on about a "new gold rush," Ause was more cautious:
But some residents fear that sand mining will spoil the local environment, said Bruce Ause, retired director of the Red Wing Environmental Learning Center.
“It’s not that they don’t want any development whatsoever,” Ause said. “But I think they want smart development, sustainable development that doesn’t damage the main reason that people live here or want to live here.”
Breitbart notes that the IUPE and the Laborers' International Union of North America (LIUNA) are aiding a Republican PAC:
On Monday, the National Journal reported that "documents filed by other groups show that two labor organizations, the International Union of Operating Engineers and the Laborers' International Union of North America, directed a combined $400,000 to the Republican group [the Defending Main Street super PAC] in September and October."
. . .earlier press reports indicate that it claims to have already raised $4 million of a planned $8 million to defeat Tea Party candidates in Republican primaries.
SW Metro Tea Party Patriot and freshman state representative Cindy Pugh doesn't seem to have had any trouble with the Republican Party before. A long time GOP activist, Pugh was endorsed over a sitting Republican legislator who later challenged her and lost in the 2012 primary. Perhaps she doesn't know about the anti-GOP post.
Or maybe challenging sitting Republican legislators is only bad when they're right-wing etremists, rather than part of the game-o of letting people elect their own leaders.
Nor do we recall any outcry from Minnesota's Tea Party chapters when Minnesota unions endorsed some of Pugh's colleagues in the last cycle.
The Republican incumbents endorsed by the union are:
Sens. Bill Ingebrigtsen (SD 8), Jeremy Miller (SD 28) and Dave Senjem (SD 25)
Reps. Jim Abeler (HD 35A), Tony Cornish (HD 23B), Kurt Daudt (HD 31A), Pat Garofalo (HD 58B), Tom Hackbarth (HD 31B), Rod Hamilton (HD 22B), Joe Hoppe (HD 47B), Larry Howes (HD 5A), Denny McNamara (HD 54B), Tim O’Driscoll (HD 13B), Tim Sanders (HD 37B), Joe Schomacker (HD 22A) and Steve Smith (HD 33B)
Will Pugh and her Tea Party supporters demand that her colleagues repudiate their union ties now that the national union of the 49ers is supporting moderate Republicans over Tea Party darlings? Or will she insist on purity and leave the GOP?
Only Howes lost his bid last year, while Daudt emerged as minority leader after the dust settled. Hamilton essentially leads the rural Republicans in the House, while Cornish, a former union rep, is a guardian of gun rights who's fundraised for Pugh.
Does her base really loathe the IUPE? The GOP?
Screenshot: The SW Metro Tea Party post. Is SWMTP leader representative Pugh as hostile to her party?
If you enjoyed reading this post, consider giving a donation via snail mail (P.O. Box 108, Maynard MN 56260) or paypal:
According to the agenda for the Inaugural State of the Workforce Symposium: From Education to Employment, sponsored by the Association of Private Sector Colleges and Universities (APSCU), the trade group for for-profit private colleges, Second Congressional District Congressman John Kline spoke this morning to symposium attendees about "Education and the Workforce."
A Republican, Kline chairs the House Education and the Workforce Committee.
He also receives boxcar loads of campaign contributions from the parent corporations operating the for-profit schools, which are typical far more expensive than Minnesota's public technical and community colleges and four-year universities.
According to Bluestem's analysis (and we'll be doublechecking our addition, not a strong suit), Kline's campaign and leadership committees took in $57,000 in contributions from PACs and individual contributors associated with for-profit colleges and two formerly for-profit colleges that recently changed their status during FEC's third quarter.
An earlier analysis by USA Today revealed that Kline received "$138,350 from April 1 through June 30 from the political action committees, employees and lobbyists of for-profit schools for his reelection campaign and his leadership PAC."
Kline received less than $15,000 from the same sector in the first quarter, but the dollars for the cycle add up to nearly a sixth of the congressman's haul for both committees in the cycle.
It's a busy time for APSCU, the trade association of America's for-profit colleges. The group spends its time trying to block reasonable measures to hold the worst actors in its industry responsible for their systematic abuses of students and taxpayers, as if the industry is permanently entitled to the enormous amounts of federal taxpayer money -- $33 billion in a recent year -- that it receives. And the industry is under siege, now that media and government investigations have exposed that many for-profit colleges offer a toxic mix of deceptive recruiting, high prices, low quality instruction, and poor job placement records.
Last week the Guardian revealed documents that, among other things, reaffirmed the link between the troubled for-profit college sector and the controversial corporate advocacy group the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC). . . .
Most of the corporations in the group have fled ALEC, Halperin writes, but ALEC hopes to woo them back:
ALEC documents showed that the group has a "prodical son" (sic) project that seeks to return to the fold lapsed members, and that list included the for-profit college companies Kaplan and Bridgepoint Education. Republic Report was the first to report last year that industry members including Kaplan, Bridgepoint, Corinthian Colleges -- and APSCU itself -- have all been ALEC members. The documents revealed by the Guardian also show that ALEC listed as possible recruits for membership the for-profit college businesses Capella, DeVry, and Education Management Corp.
So what's the problem? Halperin points out:
Given that in the past year numerous for-profit college companies, including Corinthian and Career Education Corporation, have been accused by state attorneys general and others of misleading students about their job placement rates, and given that for-profit colleges today account for 13 percent of college students but nearly half of all student loan defaults, it would be great if APSCU actually got serious about pressing its members to train students for careers. But this two-day session is just talk, not action.
And right now, it's clear that APSCU is actively resisting such accountability for its members. The Obama administration has for four years pursued a "gainful employment" rule, aimed at cutting off taxpayer funds to career education programs that consistently leave their students with insurmountable debt. Instead of accepting a reasonable rule, APSCU lobbied heavily to get the rule watered down by the White House, tried to have it overturned by Congress, and then finally managed to get it blocked by a federal judge.
In some ways, the schools resemble lampreys, attached to the body of higher education for the sake of their stockholders.
Kline and for-profit higher education corporation political contributions
A USA TODAY analysis of newly filed campaign reports shows Kline raised $138,350 from April 1 through June 30 from the political action committees, employees and lobbyists of for-profit schools for his reelection campaign and his leadership PAC. That's nearly one-quarter of his total receipts and up from $20,700 that the industry gave to Kline during the first three months of the year.
On Friday, Rep. Kline will be the keynote speaker at the annual conference of the Minnesota Career College Association, the trade group for the state's for-profit colleges. Not all for-profit college programs are bad; some work hard to train students for careers. But the Minnesota organization includes schools owned by some of the industry's worst predators -- described below.
. . . Kline, USA Todayreported over the summer, "saw a dramatic upsurge in campaign contributions from for-profit colleges in recent months," at the same time that he has advanced a bill that would shield for-profit colleges from greater accountability for waste, fraud, and abuse. Kline's legislation has the ridiculous name the "Supporting Academic Freedom through Regulatory Relief Act," but it has nothing to do with actual academic freedom. Instead, Kline's bill is about blocking the Obama administration from issuing a new "gainful employment" rule that would end taxpayer support for career training programs that consistently leave students with insurmountable loan debt . . .
Halperin connects the dots between Kline's contributors and Kline's support for "policies that have fueled a ten-year race to the bottom, where for-profit colleges instead know that the more they mislead and abuse students, the more money they can make." Go read the article for the details.
Kline's third quarter haul from for-profit colleges
The Halperin and USA Today articles both use contribution data on file with the FEC from the second fundraising quarter of 2013. More money came in during the third quarter, and so Kline's talk today might be construed by some as a reward for his own investors.
Schedule A Line #: 11C of his October quarterly campaign committee report includes additional contributions from PACs associated with for-profit schools and higher education services and the corporations that own them:
Apollo Group PAC 4615 Elwood St E Phoenix, Arizona 85040
09/20/2013
5000.00
5000.00
Apollo Group PAC 4615 Elwood St E Phoenix, Arizona 85040
09/20/2013
5000.00
10000.00
Bridgepoint Education Inc. PAC 13500 Evening Creek Dr N Ste 600 San Diego, California 92128
08/05/2013
2000.00
5500.00
Bridgepoint Education Inc. PAC 13500 Evening Creek Dr N Ste 600 San Diego, California 92128
From individuals connected with for-profit schools:
Mr. John Hayes Batson 130 Mississippi River Blvd S St Paul, Minnesota 55105
Regency Corporation
07/15/2013
1000.00
Education
1000.00
Kevin Gilligan 5804 Crescent Ter Minneapolis, Minnesota 55424
Capella Education Company
08/01/2013
2600.00
CEO
2600.00
Mr. Daniel M Hamburger 590 South Ave Glencoe, Illinois 60022
DeVry Inc
07/17/2013
500.00
President & CEO
500.00
Ms. Renee Herzing 4090 Lake Dr N Shorewood, Wisconsin 53211
Herzing University
08/19/2013
5200.00
President & CEO
5200.00
Ms. Renee Herzing 4090 Lake Dr N Shorewood, Wisconsin 53211
Herzing University
08/20/2013
-2600.00
President & CEO
MEMO
2600.00
Redesignated to General 2014
LIMITS
Ms. Renee Herzing 4090 Lake Dr N Shorewood, Wisconsin 53211
Herzing University
08/20/2013
2600.00
President & CEO
MEMO
5200.00
Redesignated from Primary 2014
LIMITS
Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson took Herzing University to task for "a medical-assisting degree that didn’t have the accreditation desired by potential employers," the Star Tribune's Paul Walsh reported in the November 27, 2013 story Minn., Herzing University reach deal over program that lacked accreditation.
Mrs. Emily H King 15W090 Sedgley Rd Burr Ridge, Illinois 60527
Retired
08/31/2013
5000.00
Retired
MEMO
5000.00
Reattributed from Robert King
LIMITS
Mrs. Emily H King 15W090 Sedgley Rd Burr Ridge, Illinois 60527
Retired
08/31/2013
-2400.00
Retired
MEMO
2600.00
Redesignated to General 2014
LIMITS
Mrs. Emily H King 15W090 Sedgley Rd Burr Ridge, Illinois 60527
Retired
08/31/2013
2400.00
Retired
MEMO
5000.00
Redesignated from Primary 2014
LIMITS
Mr. Robert E. King 15W090 Sedgley Rd Burr Ridge, Illinois 60527
Rasmussen Inc
08/30/2013
10000.00
Chairman
10000.00
Mr. Robert E. King 15W090 Sedgley Rd Burr Ridge, Illinois 60527
Rasmussen Inc
08/31/2013
-5000.00
Chairman
MEMO
5000.00
Reattributed to Emily King
LIMITS
Mr. Robert E. King 15W090 Sedgley Rd Burr Ridge, Illinois 60527
Rasmussen Inc
08/31/2013
-2400.00
Chairman
MEMO
2600.00
Redesignated to General 2014
LIMITS
Mr. Robert E. King 15W090 Sedgley Rd Burr Ridge, Illinois 60527
Rasmussen Inc
08/31/2013
2400.00
Chairman
MEMO
5000.00
Redesignated from Primary 2014
LIMITS
Mr. Michael D Perry 5549 Grove Ct W Visalia, California 93291
San Joaquin Valley College
08/30/2013
5200.00
CEO
5200.00
Mr. Michael D Perry 5549 Grove Ct W Visalia, California 93291
San Joaquin Valley College
08/31/2013
-2600.00
CEO
MEMO
2600.00
Redesignated to General 2014
LIMITS
Mr. Michael D Perry 5549 Grove Ct W Visalia, California 93291
San Joaquin Valley College
08/31/2013
2600.00
CEO
MEMO
5200.00
Redesignated from Primary 2014
LIMITS
With the PAC money, that adds up to $43,000 for the quarter. It's $48,000 with July contribution below. In Kline's Freedom & Security Leadership PAC's filings, July through November, we find one more:
Stevens-Henager's CEO, Eric Juhlin, explained to the Idaho Statesman that the switch was made to allow the college to obtain private donations and, according to the paper, "to meet the long-term vision of its single shareholder, Carl Barney, who purchased Stevens-Henager about 15 years ago." The paper also noted that Juhlin is a board member of the Center for Excellence in Higher Education, "the new name for Stevens-Henager Inc."
But there are reasons to be concerned about this new entrant to the non-profit college sector. Stevens-Henager and three affiliated schools were all, according to one of their admissions supervisors whom I reached by phone, converted to for-profit status on January 1, and their umbrella for-profit entity, actually called CollegeAmerica, Inc., became part of the non-profit Center for Excellence in Higher Education. But a new January 14 job posting says that CollegeAmerica, Inc. is hiring and it "is a privately held company that ... operates for-profit Colleges and owns Stevens-Henager Colleges in Idaho and Utah." The supervisor I spoke with at the college, whatever its name is, said that despite the formal conversion, the school was still "in transition." The job posting is for an "admissions consultant," but it is explained that the job is a "sales position" requiring "exceptional persistence" and the ability to work evenings and weekends, and that sounds a lot like the boiler-room style recruiting of for-profit colleges. . . .
Stevens-Henager and its affiliated colleges have established records of leaving their students deep in debt. For example, as of 2009, 40.2 percent of students of the Flagstaff, Arizona, campus of CollegeAmerica defaulted on their loans within three years. The figure was 38.8 percent at the CollegeAmerica campus in Denver, and a still-high 24.7 at the Stevens-Henager campus in West Haven, Utah. For comparison, the default rate at Michigan State University was 4.3 percent.
With the release of first quarter campaign donations, an examination of Federal Elections Commission disclosures by the Wonk Room has found that Kline received nearly $50,000 from for-profit colleges so far this year. Notably, on March 15, 2011, two days before the House passed his amendment against the Department of Education, Kline received $21,200 from the same companies . . .
Kline, who received another $100,000 from the industry last year, also hosted a brazen fundraiser with subprime college lobbyists on March 8th. That means for two straight weeks, industry lobbyists funneled cash to Kline so he could help them drain more taxpayer money without properly educating their students. . . .
[Drazkowski] asked, "Why is it that we cannot focus on the needs of the people who take care of the people who are the most vulnerable among us?"
Drazkowski did not specifically say he would support The 5% Campaign, but did say he would set a high priority on funding for programs that care for the state's most vulnerable.
In an interview, House Health and Human Services Policy Chairwoman Tina Liebling said it is important to remember that the GOP-led House passed legislation in 2011 cutting funding for these programs by 1.67 percent. Democrats prevented those cuts from taking effect and increased funding by an additional 1 percent. Meanwhile, nursing homes received a 5 percent pay increase. She said she supports efforts to find additional dollars for these providers in the upcoming legislative session.
"They are right. We don't pay enough to do what we need to do for people in long-term care, and it really was unfair that we providing a 5 percent increase to nursing homes and must less to long-term care."
Good for Carlson for going the extra distance and interviewing Liebling.
Video still: Steve Drazkowski in the famous meeting with care provider staff in 2011 where he recommended saving costs by installing baby-monitor-like devices to replace staffers in the wake of Republican sponsored budget cuts. Video here.
If you enjoyed reading this post, consider giving a donation via snail mail (P.O. Box 108, Maynard MN 56260) or paypal:
Now broadcasting without longtime sidekick Jake Macmillian MacAulay, Bradlee Dean nonetheless remains on the radio via the Sons of Liberty radio show.
He's still saying peculiar things on the show, even without MacAulay's help. On Saturday, October 12, near the end of the first hour, Dean claimed that Barack Obama seeks to "eradicate the Hispanic and the 'Negro' race," via Planned Parenthood.
Dean went on to say that Obama isn't popular in either black or Latino communities, so much so in the latter case that the President of the United States has to bring "illegals in Mexico" to this country.
Heckova plan to eradicate "the Hispanic race" in America, but what does a small-town blogger know.
Here's the transcript:
And do tell your black friends and your Hispanic friends, that the Obama Administration, through Planned Parenthood, is looking to eradicate the Hispanic and the Negro [sic] race. Hey friends, just saying, just ask Margaret Sanger, do a little homework friends.
Who's the greatest advocate for Planned Parenthood?
And-and-and here's another thing, let's get this right out of our minds, let's dispell all of these lies, friends, the black community doesn't support Barack Hussein Obama the way the state run media wants to you believe he does. And they do! They don't!
And the Hispanic people! Because if they did, then why is he looking to legalize and give license to illegals in Mexico to come to America if he had all of that support? He doesn't have the support!
But the state-run media has deceived you into believing that they do. Friends, they only get away with what you let them get away with.
The audio clip (along with a famous picture of Dean giving the infamous prayer--later stricken from the record of the Minnesota House--in which Dean questioned the President's faith):
Dean is riffing off a right-wing conspiracy theory that holds that Sanger, who did hold racist attitudes though not eliminationist views, planned to wipe out black people. In fact, Sanger did not believe in forced sterilization or birth control for any person. Planned Parenthood looks at the conspiracy theory here.
If the president, a man of African and white heritage, seeks to eradicate "the Negro race," he's not doing a very good job of it.
As for the President's popularity in African-American and Latino communities, perhaps the best index for measuring that opinion was the 2012 presidential election. A snapshot of demographic factors assembled by National Journal after the election noted that 93 percent of black voters cast their ballot for Obama, while 73 percent of Latino voters did so.
That's some hating on the man.
As for the plot to "to legalize and give license to illegals in Mexico to come to America," we're stumped as to what's "illegal" about Mexicans living in Mexico, or why someone who supposedly seeks to "eradicate" Latinos would do so opening up immigration from Mexico.
However, since the discussion over comprehensive immigration reform involves creating a pathway to citizenship for people living in the United States without authorization, updating rules for those seeking to live and work in the country, and border security, Bluestem missed the part about wiping out Hispanics (in order to destroy them!) or bringing in more Mexicans because Latino Americans dislike the president.
Photo: Bradlee Dean speaking at a St. Cloud College Republican sponsored event in April 2012. According to one Dean employee and former SCSU student, the visit helped rescue her from boys, booze and books.
If you enjoyed reading this post, consider giving a donation via snail mail (P.O. Box 108, Maynard MN 563260) or paypal:
Conservative talk radio gadfly and lightly-defeated 2012 Ramsey County Commissioner candidate Sue Jeffers told a September 26 meeting of the Rochester Tea Party Patriots that former Minnesota governor Tim Pawlenty and former United States Senator Norm Coleman, as well as former state party officials Ron Carey, Tony Sutton and Michael Brodkorb were Republicans in Name Only (RINOs) who destroyed the party brand and thus need to be thrown out.
There's a lot of that going around in Minnesota's Tea Party groups, which also claim to so not be Republicans. Last month, Bluestem looked at the coming visit of a RINO hunter to Tea Party groups in Central Minnestoa and the Southwest Metro in Central MN Tea Party & "Chanhassen" to host Doc Thompson's Operation RINO Hunt.
Jeffers said of the Republican stalwarts in the video below (full talk here):
I think, back in 2004, 5, 6, 7, thanks to people like Tim Pawlenty, thanks to the people like Norm Coleman, squishy, white-bread RINOs--you know what? I'll throw Ron Carey in there, I'll throw Michael Brodkorb in there, and I'll throw Tony Sutton in there, I'll throw them all under the bus.
I think they helped destroy the Republican brand and it's our job to fix it. We have to fix it. I think because they crushed down good candidates in some many different areas, not just me--because my advice to you is don't start out running for governor, start out a little bit lower on the food chain, definitely (audience laughter)--
They crush down so many good people, so many people who could have made a difference that it hurt us, it destroyed our brand.
And I think that people like John McCain now, who's calling Ted Cruz names, or Lindsey Graham, people like that, they're hurting the Republican brand even more, and of course they don't have one good thing to say about the Tea Party people, they don't have one nice thing to say.
They all claim to be conservatives, but they aren't. They aren't. And we have to start calling them on it and we have to start throwing them out.
Here's the video:
Jeffers always has been known to challenge Minnesota's Republican establishment from the right--she famously primaried Tim Pawlenty as he sought a second term in 2006, but Bluestem is surprised to hear the names of Carey, Sutton and Brodkorb placed in her litany. Coleman did start out as Democrat, and Pawlenty seemed squishy to Jeffers and her ilk for embrace dirty hippie policies like renewable energy standards.
But Sutton and Brodkorb? While Sutton destroyed the MNGOP brand through reckless accounting, we don't recall ideological beefs with the anti-choice, anti-gay, anti-immigrant and anti-gambling political operative. Ditto with Brodkorb, who seemed brought down more by his philandering than his politics. During their sway, the Republican Party brought such Jeffers favs as Dave Thompson to office in 2010--and Thompson received a healthy stipend as a media consultant while he ran for state senate. Just saying.
Carey a RINO? Is she inventing a new acronym: RINO In Name Only?
Bonus round: Sutton purged moderate Republicans in 2010
In a dramatic display of the new Republican order, Minnesota’s state GOP
banished 18 prominent party members — including two former governors
and a retired U.S. senator — as punishment for supporting a third-party candidate for governor. . . .
Those exiled warned that the measure, which bans the 18 former members
from participating in party activities for two years and bars them from
attending the 2012 Republican National Convention, may provoke a
backlash that undercuts the party’s competitiveness in a state that’s
voted for the GOP presidential nominee just once in the past half
century.
“The Republican party is trying to become ... you would call it
introverted totalitarianism,” said former congressman and Gov. Al Quie, a
onetime vice presidential prospect who plans to stick with the party
despite the penalty. “It’s just plain dumb on their part. ... In the
long run, if the party persists with this, [it's] going to just become
smaller and smaller and eventually something else would come in its
place.”
Among those rebuked along with Quie were former U.S. Sen. David
Durenberger, former Gov. Arne Carlson and former state House Speaker
David Jennings.
State Republican Chairman Tony Sutton said Saturday’s measure, which
passed by 59 to 55 votes, was “a venting of frustration” that grew out
of the belief that the candidacy of Republican-turned-independent Tom
Horner cost GOP nominee Tom Emmer the governor’s race in November.
Brodkorb later threw Emmer under the bus, blaming his campaign for the loss and more. Now he and Sutton--now two party leadership elections in the past--are the RINOs facing exile if Jeffers and her ilk get their way.
Will this purge include folks like moderate Rochester Republican Senator Dave Senjem? Elsewhere in the video, Jeffers and her audience aren't very happy about Mayo's new Destination Medical Center. How involved can an independent organization like the Rochester Tea Party-- which fought with the IRS for its tax status--get with the internal politics of one party?
In June 2012, the IRS contacted the group and informed them they should apply for 501(c)(4)
status instead [of 501(c)(3) status as a charitable organization], which covers not-for-profit civic leagues or
organizations operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare.
On Sept. 6, 2012, the group received 501(c)(4) status.
Photo: Sue Jeffers, who talked to the Rochester Tea Party Patriots on September 26, 2013, as if they were part of the Republican Party. Perish the thought.
If you enjoyed reading this post, consider giving a donation via paypal:
The Belle Plaine Herald has published a remarkable letter by Gene Thomas Kornder, who received 13.38 percent of the vote in the 2012 Senate District Republican primary.
By proclaiming November to be "Muslim Appreciation Month," the current occupant of the White House has reached a new low.
Paradoxically, I agree. Americans do need to thoroughly appreciate Islam and its' Muslims.
To fully appreciate Islam, I recommend these books: 'What Americans Need to Know About Islam' by Michael Federer and 'Barbarian Cruelty' by Francis Brooks. First published in 1693, 'Barbarian Cruelty' is available from T.B.R. Book Club, P.O. Box 15877, Washington D.C. 20003 for $9 and $4 S&H.
A word to the wise is sufficient.
Gene Thomas Kornder
Bluestem believes a word to the wise is not only only sufficent, but necessary for those reading this letter. Let's unpack this one, beginning with "Muslim Appreciation Month."
Pants on fire: Polifacts and Snopes on "Muslim Appreciation Month"
Apparently, the editors of the Belle Plaine Herald have not learned that Google is their friend, as it's possible this missive might not have seen the light of day had they simply tossed "Muslim Appreciation Month" into the search engine.
The fact that it came from a website, National Report, known for Onion-like satire, didn’t stop some bloggers from reporting it as news.
The piece was packed with fake details designed to press anti-Muslim
buttons: President Barack Obama held a news conference to make his
declaration. He said Muslims "are not all bad. In fact, most of them are
good."
His announcement was hailed by a "member of the Muslim Brotherhood’s
Freedom and Justice Party." He said he would work with Congress to make
it easier for Muslims to earn U.S. citizenship.
"Mr. Matei of the Muslim Brotherhood assured me they want to come to
this country to help us, not harm us," he was reported to say.
Following other attempts to paint Obama as a Muslim -- such as this one that we rated Pants on Fire -- the National Report’s gambit worked.
"How dare Obama declare November, the month when we give thanks to
God for our blessings and great nation, National Muslim Appreciation
Month!" wrote a blogger for Tea Party Nation.
The PolitiFact inbox saw email after email with links to such stories from readers who got it from outraged friends.
Urban-legend debunker Snopes.com quickly confirmed that it originated with National Report.
The headline was utterly invented, and the event was entirely fabricated. . . .
Snopes.com's debunking of the bloggers' inability to understand satire closes with the recognition of a nice touch on the part of the National Report writer:
The phone number given at the end of the National Report article for contacting the "24-hour National Muslim Appreciation Hotline" actually belongs to the notorious Westboro Baptist Church.
Uffda.
White nationalism: the Barnes Review and Willis Carto
Bluestem doesn't wonder that Kornder missed that one, since he's recommending books available through the TBR Book Club, an adjunct venue of the notorious white nationalist publication, the Barnes Review. Unlike the folly of witless bloggers failing to understand satire, the Barnes Review and its founder Willis A.Carto are no laughing matters.
The Southern Poverty Law Center Intelligence Files entry for the Barnes Review begins:
Founded by Willis Carto in 1994, The Barnes Review (TBR) is one of the most virulent anti-Semitic organizations around. Its flagship journal, The Barnes Review,
and its website, Barnesreview.org, are dedicated to historical
revisionism and Holocaust denial. The organization is also a moneymaking
enterprise. Besides journal subscriptions, its TBR Book Club and online
bookstore promote and sell a wide range of extremist books and
publications. The Barnes Review also hosts nearly annual
conferences that attract an international crowd of antigovernment
extremists, anti-Semites, white supremacists, and racist conspiracy
theorists.
Voters in most of Le Sueur County and other parts of state Senate
District 20 won’t be able to use the old “they’re all the same, anyway”
excuse for not voting in the Aug. 14 primary election. . . .
At times Kornder sounds like other Republican candidates: “More people
work for government than for private enterprise, and this situation is
unsustainable.”
Mostly, though, he sounds different.
Kornder wants to look into whether powerful energy companies are
suppressing revolutionary new forms of energy such as small-scale
nuclear fusion reactors. He’d like to abolish the income tax and
believes property taxes are unconstitutional under the Minnesota
Constitution.
He wants to shut down the Metropolitan Council and shift its revenue
into a new “Bank of Minnesota,” patterned after the Bank of North Dakota
formed by the Nonpartisan League a century ago. That would allow the
state to pay interest to itself when borrowing, Kornder said.
Kornder would shrink government and fund it with sales and excise
taxes, making the excise taxes progressive when possible — applying
higher rates, for instance, to luxury cars than to lower-end models.
That’s much preferable to property taxes, which are a tax on wealth, and
income taxes, which tax the production of wealth, he said.
“If you tax wealth and the production of wealth, you’re actually
limiting or destroying these things,” said Kornder, who has previously
run unsuccessfully for the Belle Plaine School Board and the state House
(in 1978 as a member of The American Party).
In response to a questionnaire from the Northfield News, Kornder summed
up his motivation for running: “I offer those who are disappointed with
the current leadership, those who support Ron Paul, Tea Partiers, 911
Truthers, Birthers and Conspiracy ‘freaks,’ the opportunity to put
someone in the Minnesota Senate who will make a difference.”
Kornder told the Belle Plaine Herald (among other things):
What facets of the Republican Party would you change?
In recent decades, the neo-cons, evangelical-Zionists and RINOs
(Republicans In Name Only), have transformed the Republican Party into a
tool of the New World Order. I am determined to reverse this.
It's no wonder that Dudley won; what we wonder about is the sanity of the 400 people who voted for this guy, as well as the discernment of the editors who ran the letter.
Photo: A double facepalm from Washington.
If
you enjoyed reading this post, consider giving a donation via paypal:
Marriage equality is the law of the land, but St. Cloud Times Writers Group columnist Cathy Williamson, a landscape architect and home educator whose contributor bio notes that she "loves creativity, people and truth," assures readers that God is still hating on teh gay.
While these and other references paint the picture of God’s norm for
marriage, specific teachings reveal God’s negative attitude toward
homosexuality. Leviticus 18:22; 20:15: “You shall not lie with a male as
with a woman; it is an abomination,” and those who do “shall be put to
death” for their guilt. I Corinthians 6:9 informs homosexuals that they
will not inherit the kingdom of God. In Romans 1, homosexual acts are
deemed “contrary to nature, dishonorable passions,” deserving death.
Those doing them give approval to those who practice them, thereby
heaping up more liability. In I Timothy 1:8-10, homosexuals are counted
among the “unrighteous.”
There’s just not any indication here that God is pro-homosexual behavior.
The biblical God of love would have homosexuals turn to him for a change of heart, not a change of status.
Yes,
I wonder at the abysmal research that supported the promotion of
homosexual marriage. But I wonder more that we Minnesotans, well
educated and replete with Christian churches, settled for such poor
scholarship and skewed biblical understanding. What were we thinking?
Indeed. Bluestem does wonder what a person so concerned with scholarship is thinking when she blends Leviticus 18:22 and 20:15 in a discussion of same-sex behavior. While 18:22 (Revised Standard Version) is related to the topic, here's 20:15:
“‘If a man has sexual relations with an animal, he is to be put to death, and you must kill the animal.
That's some scholarship, chapter and verse. Some of Bluestem's friends do date bears, but we're not sure how Williamson might document that, much less punish it. Maybe she had furries in mind.
Both chapters also forbid married hanky-panky while Aunt Flo is visiting, although only the second iteration shares God's prescribed punishment: banishment. Perhaps Williamson can wave the bloody flag of divine law on that one in a future column.
"What were they thinking?" is a rhetorical question, but the "kill the homosexuals" verse from Leviticus (actually 20:13) that she lovely cites did come up in the discussion--and was rejected by Minnesota for Marriage as well pro-equality forces in a memorable episode in the amendment fight. On june 28, 2012, Bluestem posted in M4M disavows Leviticus 20:13 verse used in October letter it promoted on Twitter:
Hacking a person's or organization's social media accounts is
strategically stupid stuff, and it's likely that the thimblewit who hijacked Andy Parrish's gmail account (and all the related Facebook pages to which the intruder gained access) will be caught.
The culprit deserves what's coming to him or her.
But the bible verse that he or she posted, creating such an uproar,
isn't new to Minnesota for Marriage tweets. Back on October 6, 2011, the M4M account tweeted:
Today a fight is brewing for the Marriage Amendment that defines a
marriage as between one man and one woman. People are saying that this
amendment means nothing, that it is no big deal because we have laws
against homosexual marriage. They are wrong.
We need this Marriage Amendment because if we don’t, then they can
get the law changed. This same homosexual group has changed the law in
other places such as Iowa and New York. Now they say they want to get
the law changed in Minnesota. They plan a massive blanketing of
Minnesota by going neighborhood to neighborhood, making phone calls and
distributing pamphlets.
This is what the Lord says of homosexual marriage: Romans 1:24-27, Leviticus 18:22-23, and Leviticus 20:13.
“‘If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman,
both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to
death; their blood will be on their own heads.
When M4M deputy campaign director first raised the Facehack issue
yesterday, he tweeted that the posting on the M4M page was "garbage":
My Twitter, Facebook, @gmail.com @me.com were all hacked and garbage was posted on the MInnesota For Marriage FB. I won't be intimidated.
“We are currently working with Facebook, Twitter, Gmail, and Apple to
see who hacked Andy’s account and who posted this message,” reads the
message posted on Minnesota for Marriage’s Facebook page on Wednesday
morning. “Clearly we would never advocate for anyone to be put to death.
We strongly believe that people are entitled to love whomever they
choose, but they are not entitled to redefine marriage for all of
society.”
While M4M will continue to push for enshrining one version of
marriage in the state constitution (the bible suggests other forms),
it's good to see the group moving from recommending LTEs quoting
Leviticus to taking the position that people can love whomever they want
without facing the death penalty.
As for Old Testment passages that note multiple wives(those forms of marriage other than one man, one woman), Williamson writes:
Heterosexual marriages remain the norm as the biblical narrative unfolds, despite that many Bible characters wrongly multiplied the number of wives in the equation.
So the Bible is right, except for those cases where it doesn't fit Williamson's definition of divinely-sanctioned "Edenic" marriage. Okay then: it's the characters in the books' faults, not the author.
Straw man: using outdated Kinsey claims to bash equality
Earlier in the letter, Williamson also commits the signature rhetorical move of the movement to end marriage equality: assert that those arguing first against the amendment, then for marriage equality, made a claim that they didn't, then attack that strawman.
When the legal definition of marriage lay on Minnesota’s table recently, the public was informed that 10 percent of our population is homosexual. That figure came from the faulty mid-century Kinsey report. However, research reported in a 2012 online Atlantic article, “Americans Have No Idea How Few Gay People There Are,” puts it closer to 1.7 percent.
During that same time, U.S. Sen. Al Franken informed me that homosexual marriage would strengthen Minnesota families. When asked to quantify that statement, he met me with silence.
That's quite a bait and switch, and we admire Franken for refusing to play Williamson's game of "quantity," however she happened to actually frame it for the senator she was baiting. Apparently, the smaller a minority, the more empowered Williamson feels she is to work to deny it rights.
But if one walks the Atlantic article back to the Williams Institute study on which it's based, we find this sentence at the top of the summary:
An estimated 3.5% of adults in the United States identify as lesbian, gay, or bisexual
Williamson's definition of "homosexual" erases all bisexuals, including those who might fall in love and wish to marry a same-sex partner.
But Bluestem recalls that Minnesota United, the coalition that worked first to defeat the amendment, then secure the freedom to marry for all people, didn't much talk about the percentage of Minnesotans who might be LGBTQ. Rather the argument was framed on the very American proposition that the loves between two people, regardless of gender, were no different, and that every single adult should be able to marry the single adult that he or she loves.
Thus, the group didn't turn to Kinsey or even the Williams Institute study that's the basis for the Atlantic article when it came time to "quantify." In those few moments when MU talked numbers, it used the most reliable data available: same-sex households enumerated in the United States Census.
Minnesotans United for All Familiesis
a coalition of organizations dedicated to defeating the constitutional
amendment that would limit the freedoms of Minnesotans and ban marriage
for same-sex couples in Minnesota.
Freedom to Marryisthe campaign to win marriage nationwide for all loving and committed couples.
Human Rights Campaign is the
United States' largest civil rights organization working to achieve
lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) equality.
OutFront Minnesotais the central statewide organization leading a multi-year campaign for marriage in Minnesota.
Project 515 is a
focused initiative with a specific, achievable goal: to ensure that
same-sex couples and their families have equal rights and considerations
under Minnesota law.
POLLING DATA: A rapidly increasing plurality of residents in Minnesota support marriage for same-sex couples, with 51% of
respondents saying they support the freedom to marry, and only 47%
saying they are opposed. These numbers affirm that the momentum for
state legislators to extend the freedom to marry to same-sex couples in
Minnesota is stronger than ever. (KSTP/SurveyUSA, April 2013)
Until 2000, the US Census Bureau didn’t even count same sex couples. Now, the government reports more gay households than ever before, including Minnesota.
It’s TRUE: 13,718 same sex couples reported living in Minnesota in
2010. It’s a 50 percent jump in just 10 years, according to the latest
government count.
IN FACT, one study, from the California-based Williams Institute,
estimates 54 percent of Minnesota’s same-sex couples are female while 46
percent are male. . . .
The numbers may be under-reported, and it doesn’t reflect how many people may consider themselves gay.
So, where does Minnesota rank?
Approximately 2.9 percent of Minnesota’s 5,379,139 population call
themselves gay: that’s below the national average of 3.5 percent.
Washington, D.C. ranks highest with a gay population estimated at 10 percent. North Dakota ranks the lowest at 1.7 percent. . . .
On the other hand, we've never found telling voters that they're dupes to be a particularly flattering or winning strategy. The Friends of Cathy W can try it.
Photo: The first same-sex couple to be married by Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Rybak in City Hill. Also their cute son. Via MSNBC (top); Cathy Williamson, via St. Cloud Times (below).
If you enjoyed reading this post, consider giving a donation via paypal:
While southern Minnesota's geography is largely rural, voters there cluster in Rochester (Minnesota's third largest city), thriving mini-metro college towns as Winona and Mankato, and blue-collar regional enclaves like Austin, New Ulm and Faribault.
Nathan Gonzalez, deputy editor of the Rothenberg Political Report,
said he sees the race as one in which Republicans are still looking for a
candidate.
“Republicans are determined to play offense in Minnesota’s 1st
District,” Gonzalez said in an email. “They are still searching for a
candidate, but they don’t want Walz to get a free ride. Walz has proven
to be a tough incumbent to defeat, so it’s up to Republicans to prove
that 2014 will be any different.”
Shaw explores the geographic calculus that the Republicans need to solve to beat Walz, although electoral history demonstrates that geography isn't destiny for the Mankato DFLer.
Walz beat six-term Rochester Republican Gil Gutknecht by 5.62 percent spread in an upset in 2006, Rochester doctor Brian Davis by a nearly 30 percent landslide in 2008 and Hayfield legislator Randy Demmer by 5 percent in the Republican wave year of 2010. Hayfield is about a half-hour drive from Rochester, a stone's throw in the sprawling Fighting First.
Shaw points out, "In 2012, Walz defeated his Republican opponent, Allen Quist, by a commanding 15 percentage points." Nicollet County made the Republican a relative home boy for a Mankato incumbent.
Those who subscribe should read all of Shaw's solid reporting. One thing that remains constant for CD1 Republicans is the rhetoric that Walz acts "like us" in the district while voting with his caucus in DC:
“The fact is that when he comes home, he talks like us. When he goes to
Washington he votes like [House Minority Leader] Nancy Pelosi,”
Stevenson said. “Republicans don’t feel that he matches the district
very well at all. His support for Obamacare is really what’s motivating
folks here.”
Earlier this year, Mankato Free Press veteran political reporter Mark Fischenich pointed out how shopworn and unsaleable that line of goods has been for district Republicans:
[Aaron] Miller also made the same pledge that Brian Davis, Randy Demmer and
Allen Quist made early in their campaigns to unseat Walz, who defeated
six-term incumbent Congressman Gil Gutknecht: to persuade southern
Minnesotans that Walz is conning them rather than revealing his true
beliefs and values.
“He wants you to believe he’s ‘the moderate from Mankato,’” Miller said.
This time it’s for an email he sent comparing union politics to the tactics of Fidel Castro and Adolf Hitler. . . .
In the email, the woman asked Hackbarth to support Gov. Mark Dayton’s
budget plan that would raise income taxes on Minnesota’s top earners.
When she got a return email from the lawmaker, she took it to the union that represents her.
Hackbarth wrote: “Are you a union member? If so, are they the
communist giving you this propaganda?Do you know the who, what, when,
where, why and how of Fidel Castro? Hitler rose to power using and
blaming the Jews for the destruction of the German economy. Castro built
his army of murderers by blaming the rich bankers and capitalist for
destroying Cuba and taking advantage of the Cuban people. Hummm?” . . .
. . . House District 31B: Rep. Tom Hackbarth is seeking a ninth term in the Legislature. He will face opposition from at least one fellow Republican — Calvin Bahr, who runs a trucking business in the area — at Saturday’s endorsing convention. “The general thinking here is that I don’t agree with all of the things that Rep. Hackbarth is proposing for laws,” Bahr said.
In particular, he takes issue with the incumbent’s support for funding a new Minnesota Vikings stadium from the proceeds of casinos at horse racing tracks. “That will be a very big issue,” Bahr said.
“Running a private company to fund capital improvements for another private company is not a role of government.” . . .
Beyond the issues, Hackbarth’s personal conduct could be a concern for delegates. Shortly after the 2010 election, he was briefly detained by the police in St. Paul after being spotted in the parking lot of a Planned Parenthood clinic with a loaded gun. Hackbarth said at the time that he was unaware that the parking lot belonged to the security-conscious facility. He was not charged with any crime, but he was stripped of the chairmanship of the Environment and Natural Resources Committee as a result. He was subsequently given the gavel of the House’s Energy Subcommittee.
Bahr said he doesn’t intend to make an issue of the incident. “There was a small lapse in judgment, and I’m sure he learned from it,” Bahr said. “Everybody makes mistakes.”
Yes, ladies, stalking dates in Highland Park allies is no problem.
Paul Bolin of Otsego was the first Republican to announce for this open
seat, although he has not yet registered a campaign committee, followed
closely by David FitzSimmons, who recently moved to Albertville, and
Eric Lucero of Dayton. Lucero lives in a tiny section of Dayton in
Wright county.
Lucero did not file for office with the Minnesota Secretary of State's election division in 2012, according to Politics In Minnesota and does not appeared to have stayed in the contest for party endorsement. FitzSimmons was endorsed by the district's Republicans on the first ballot over Bolin, receiving over 76 percent of the ballots, the Star News reported. Lucero opted to run for Dayton City Council; he took first in a four-way race for two seats.
The healthiest family environment consists of one Father and one
Mother honoring vows to each other. To this end, government policies
must be architected to promote and support the healthiest form of the
family unit. However, government policies of the last several decades
have instead been leading the assault against the family unit with the following attacks:
Gay marriage and the homosexual lifestyle
Blending the gender distinctions such as women in combat and homosexuals openly serving in the military
Tax dollars funding groups which actively promote and perform abortions
Welfare system encouraging out-of-wedlock births
Usurping of parental authority such as allowing girls of any age
to buy the morning after pill without a prescription and without
parental permission or knowledge
FitzSimmons is now paying the price in his House
district in Wright County, perhaps the most conservative county in
Minnesota, as he is forced to defend his vote and his political turf.
FitzSimmons says the reaction in his district is mixed.
“I
think like most things dealing with the electorate, it’s a wide variety
of viewpoints,” he said. “Everything from people who are upset with the
results, upset with me — and people who are sympathetic to the
situation and knew I was trying to get something out of the
legislation.” . . .
. . .He is the former Republican chair of Wright County
and former chair of the 6th Congressional District, represented by
Michele Bachmann, whom he has supported. He managed, briefly, Tom
Emmer’s gubernatorial campaign and volunteered at the media event where
Emmer announced his campaign for the Bachmann seat.
FitzSimmons
may get some help from Minnesotans United, the group that lobbied for
gay marriage and promised campaign help for supportive lawmakers from
socially conservative districts. Fitzsimmons didn’t make the first cut
of names that Minnesotans United mentioned in a recent fundraising
email.
The group is also supporting all five Republicans who voted for the
marriage bill, including state Sen. Branden Petersen of Andover, who
doesn't face re-election until 2016. GOP state Reps. David FitzSimmons
of Albertville, Pat Garofalo of Farmington, Andrea Kieffer of Woodbury
and Jenifer Loon of Eden Prairie also are listed.
Will Lucero be able to mount a successful challenge to FitzSimmons? Stay tuned.
As we mentioned in a post yesterday, Jim "Mr. Conservative" Hagedorn is formally announcing his second congressional bid in a few minutes (he came in fourth in 2010 behind Randy Demmer, Allen Quist, Jim Engstrand, the Faribault County Register reported May 1, 2010 in Hagedorn’s political career over before it begins) but enough about that.
In other First District news, former state Sen. Mike Parry of Waseca
said he has ruled out running for any political office in 2014. Parry
had been mulling a possible run for the First District seat and
Secretary of State. He ran for the congressional seat in 2012, losing to
Republican Allen Quist in a primary.
Parry said he had a chance to sit down with Benson and decided to
endorse him. He said expects to campaign heavily for the Rochester
Republican and host fundraisers.
"He is the right candidate for the right time. He understands what
the First Congressional District needs. He understands the problems that
we are facing, and he knows the issues. He is committed to win this
race. I believe he will and that's why I am endorsing him 100 percent,"
Parry said.
We look forward to the special emo touch in the race.
Forget marriage licenses, security for a spouse and children or any of the at least 515 state laws that discriminate against families based on marriage before the Minnesota legislature legalized marriage equality for all loving adult couples. That's not what same-sex couples are after, Pugh writes on a Facebook friend's wall.
No, North Star Tea Party co-founder and probable ALEC member Pugh (R-Chanhassen) knows what same-sex activists are really after, if Bluestem is to believe a comment she made on Nicole Bengston's Facebook posting of a link to Millionaire Gay Couple Sues to Force Church Wedding, a Charisma News story, with the headnote, "Here's what "gay marriage" is after.... Taking away YOUR rights and freedom of speech."
Pugh comments:
Cindy Pugh VERY
upsetting, Nicole. YOU are RIGHT that 'this' is what the 'same-sex'
activists are after ... OUR First Amendment RIGHTS [Religious &
Freedom of Speech]! : (
And who is the "Nicole Bengston" to whom Cindy Pugh responding? A source tells us that she's been associated with Bradlee Dean's You Can Run But You Can't Hide International, although there are rumors of a falling out by Bengtson and her husband with the organization in 2012.
You Can Run But You Cannot Hide International is run by President
Bradley Dean Smith of Annandale, who is better known to his followers as
“Bradlee Dean,” and Secretary Jacob McMillian MacAulay, a/k/a "Jake
McMillian," the only two paid members on the organization’s board. Other
directors include Nicole Bengston, vice president; Heather MacAulay
(Jake’s spouse), treasurer, Ron Stone, director; and Todd Bergren,
director.
Her Linked In profile, which uses the same photo as her Facebook page, she served as the Campaign Coordinator for YCR from March 2002 – July 2012. We do not know if she continues to serve as Vice President of the controversial ministry. Perhaps State Fair goers could ask the people staffing the YCR booth at the Great Minnesota Get Together.
She appears to be married to Daniel Bengtson, who also lives at the address on the 990 filings for 2011. According to his Linked In profile, Daniel Bengtson served as Director Of Street Teams, Minister, Fundraiser for YCR from 2001 until September 2012.
While many Republicans claimed to have no knowledge of toxic metal rocker Bradlee Dean after his stint as chaplain for the Minnesota House in May 2011 in which he delivered a prayer questioning the President's faith, Pugh (who was not yet serving) could not have made that claim.
Pugh appears to have maintained her friendship with a long-term YCR employee.
What's Cindy Pugh reacting to on Bengston's Facebook wall?
The Charisma story the Pugh and Bengtson are reacting to taken from the Chelmsford Weekly News' article, Gay dads campaign for church wedding, is about Barrie and Tony Drewitt-Barlow who hope to get married in their local church, St John the Baptist, in Danbury. Under Britain's new law, "religious organisations have to opt in to offer weddings.
The Church of England and the Church of Wales are not offering weddings." Barrie Drewitt-Barlow claims that his legal action “ . . .is no reflection on our local church, who have been nothing but supportive towards us . . .We understand their hands are tied by a higher group of people within the church.”
The Charisma article quotes an earlier article from the paper but does not link to it. Bluestem found two prior reports (here and here) but apparently the entire text of the article Charisma cites is not available online.
And of course, since America is still governed by British law (okay, Bluestem is kidding), if those to lovebirds get their way in St John the Baptist Church in Danbury, Chelmsford, Essex, then "OUR First Amendment RIGHTS" are such goners.
Images: Cindy Pugh wins the 2012 primary against sitting incumbent Steve Smith (top); a screenshot of the exchange (middle); Cindy Pugh tables at a 2011 screening of Bradlee Dean's biopic, "My War" (below).
If you enjoy reading posts like this on Bluestem Prairie, consider throwing some coin in the tip jar:
How well are things going in the National Republican Congressional Committee's war on Minnesota Seventh District Congressman Collin Peterson since announcing a television ad buy?
Next, the editorial board of the conservative Forum Communications newspaper, the Fargo Forum, issued what would pass for an endorsement if it were published in October 2014. In Forum editorial: Attack ad won’t fly in the 7th, they write:
Rep. Collin Peterson, D-Minn., is square in the sights of the
National Republican Congressional Committee. The long-serving District 7
congressman is described in an NRCC cable TV ad as an out-of-touch
politician who has been in Congress too long.
The voters of the
district disagree. And it is likely (although anything can happen before
November 2014) Peterson will easily win another term if he decides to
run again. By the way, he should seek re-election. He’s done well by the
people of the 7th and they have rewarded him again and again with
near-landslide victories. . . .
Peterson knows the people of his district. He has represented their
interests as a moderate Blue Dog Democrat. They seem more than satisfied
with his work. Despite the NRCC’s attempt to paint him as anti-farmer,
most farmers in the 7th know better. Despite the lame charge that
Peterson is responsible for “gridlock and dysfunction in Washington,”
voters in the district know which party controls the U.S. House; they
know House Republicans are blocking a balanced farm bill.
Peterson
should welcome the NRCC’s attack ad. It seems desperate. It is shallow
political boilerplate. He can enjoy the rest of the August recess in the
beautiful 7th, and take some comfort that the NRCC is targeting him.
He’ll spin it into a badge of honor.
At Politics in Minnesota, Briana Bierschbach reports in NRCC targets Peterson in new TV ad that the Beltway Republicans have goatroped a Prinsburg farmer into saying Peterson’s support for cap-and-trade puts farmers at risk.
Since taking the vote, Peterson has been re-elected twice. The Fargo Forum reports:
. . . Peterson has cruised to easy victories in nearly every race since he
was first elected in 1990. He beat Republican challenger Lee Byberg in
2010 by a 17.6-point spread, and again in 2012 by a 25-point margin.
Bierschbach notes that Peterson "has no announced GOP challenger yet," but Craig Bishop, chair of the CD7 Republicans, is definitely on the market for a candidate. Just two hours after the PIM story appeared, Craig sent the following email to his list under the subject head "Searching for a candidate for Congress."
Wanted: Someone they can talk with, willing to work hard, raise money, and be passionate about the country going in the wrong direction.
From: Seventh District Republicans <republicans@mncd7gop.com>
Date: Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 3:14 PM Subject: Searching for a candidate for Congress
Candidate Search for Congress
7th District Search Committee formed
The
Seventh District Republicans are looking for a strong candidate to take
on DFL incumbent Collin Peterson in a run for Congress. At this time,
we are asking for your suggestions of potential candidates we might be
able to talk to.
A good potential candidate
would be someone with a passion for our country's freedoms and future,
someone who is concerned about the direction our nation is headed and
someone willing to put in the hard work and major fundraising necessary
to run for Congress.
If you know someone who
might make a strong candidate for Congress, or if you have any interest
yourself, please call us or reply via email so that we can contact him
or her to discuss this prospective opportunity.
Our friend thinks Bluestem's editor has been lonely, but alas, there are plains hog-nosed snakes and five-lined skinks we have yet to meet before we say hello and try for a place on Craig's list.
Photo: A Reuters photo of Peterson.
If you enjoy reading posts like this on Bluestem Prairie, consider throwing some coin in the tip jar:
Despite a spate of scolding letters-to-the-editor published by the Mankato Free Press, former state senator Al DeKruif, who served one full short-term (2011-2012), is dropping plans to compete for the Republican endorsement to run against four-term DFL congressman Tim Walz.
The gap will be filled by political newcomer Aaron Miller of Byron.
Former Sen. Al DeKruif, of Madison Lake, has announced his
withdrawal from the Republican race to challenge U.S. Rep. Tim Walz for
Minnesota's 1st Congressional District.
DeKruif said he believes
Republicans have a very strong chance of winning the 1st District in
2014, but he is too busy with work on his resort to run. He wants to
step out of the way to give other Republicans the best chance of having
an effective campaign. He will offer support for the candidate that
becomes Walz's opponent.
However, he is still reserving the
ability to get back into the race if the field ends up being too weak.
Such a decision would depend on how the race develops. He would also be
open to running in a future election.
Miller is slated to launch his campaign at 10 a.m. on Tuesday at
Soldiers Field Veterans Memorial. The Republican will then travel to
Mankato for a 2 p.m. press conference. He will continue his tour of the
district on Wednesday with stops in Owatonna, Albert Lea, Austin and
Winona.
A political newcomer, Miller is a command sergeant major in the Army
reserves who has done several tours of duty overseas and been awarded
the Bronze Star. According to his LinkedIn profile, he is a senior hospital account manager at rEVO Biologics.
Miller will join Rochester area state representative Mike Benson in the pursuit of the Republican endorsement.
While Miller is making the press rounds on Tuesday, Congressman Walz will be at Farmfest. At 10:30 a.m. he'll join Seventh District Congressman Collin Peterson, the ranking Democratic member of the U.S. House Agriculture Committee, Roger Johnson, President, National Farmers Union, Dale Moore, Public Policy Director, American Farm Bureau, and
Bob Worth, Vice President, American Soybean Association in a panel on "Reaching an Endpoint on a New Farm Bill."
Peterson and Walz are sharing a booth, as are the First and Seventh CD Republicans. The state DFL has a separate booth.
With the Tea Party reving up again, it's possible that politicians at the production ag show may see the sort of antics that marked the 2009 forums. However, while Farmfest audiences and forum organizer Kent Thiesse enjoy a lively exchange, they also respect civility.
While Benson and Miller seem like paragons of stability, there's still hope for some excitement in this race. Moniz reports:
Former Sen. Mike Parry, who unsuccessfully ran in the 2012 Republican
primary for the 1st District, and Jim Hagedorn, who unsuccessfully ran
in the 2010 Republican endorsement convention, are still weighing their
options. Parry is also considering a run for Minnesota's Secretary of
State or for governor.
With those margins, Quist has certainly earned the right to say when he's embarrassed, and he's circulating a letter to local newspapers in which he shares his feelings. The New Ulm Journal was first to post Walz embarrasses us on the Farm Bill:
We should all be embarrassed by the behavior of Tim Walz regarding the farm bill.
Walz
used the label "extremist" to describe anyone who wants to trim back
the excessive price tag of $1 trillion over ten years. Name calling
instead of giving information is unbecoming a Congressman. . . .
Congressmen like Walz are the
reason government spending is out of control. They are the reason
Congress has an all time low approval rate.
Name calling,
falsehoods, unwillingness to be part of good government procedure and
out of control spending - that is what we have in Tim Walz.
Quist whined about Walz name calling during the congressional race as well. Read the entire letter at the Journal. A local Republican from North Mankato writes to agree with Quist.
I read the recent letter to the editor by Allen Quist. I found his
attack on Tim Walz the epitome of what is wrong in Washington.
Mr.
Quist seemed to forget that just a few weeks ago Congressman Walz voted
for the bipartisan Farm Bill, passed out of the Republican controlled
committee. This would reduce spending and give much needed reform.
This was a bill that included cuts to the SNAP program that Mr. Quist
has so desperately desired and then forgets to even mention it.
This
country was built on compromise. (This means give and take, not just
one way!!) And rather than have common sense reforms, Allen Quist would
rather take an extreme - yes, extreme - position on one of the most
bi-partisan bills to come before Congress and create more gridlock in
Washington.
I think Mr. Quist isn't interested in what is right
for southern Minnesotans, he'd rather shut down Congress than have a
bipartisan, common-sense bills pass.
Tim Walz iz one of the only people working for us.
I went on youtube video and watched his talk before Congress and was so proud of him and so proud he was our representative.
Nelson's earlier letters to the Journal suggest that she's a Democrat. Others have used the word "embarrassment" discussing current Farm Bill politics, like MSNBC's UP in What you get for embarrassing the Speaker of the House:
Boehner and the GOP leadership pushed
the Farm bill even farther to the right, using a party-line vote on to
pass a bill that doesn't include food stamps. It's the first time in 40
years that the program has been stripped out of a farm bill. Steve
Kornacki’s panelists discuss.
Walz doesn't seem central to the discourse of chagrin, however outraged his defeated opponent may become. Here's the YouTube of Walz that so upset Mr. Quist:
Cartoon: Quist continues to rise from a political grave and Ken Avidor's drawing suggests the means.Via City Page/Avidor Brodkorb Files.
If you appreciate reading posts like this one on Bluestem Prairie, consider making a donation via paypal:
Sometimes Bluestem's friends write the most wonderful letters to the editors of their local newspapers. Take this gem from Naomi Wente, a brilliant 2013 University of Minnesota--Morris graduate who's sticking around Stevens County.
This letter is in response to the letter sent by Marilyn Ingebrigtsen to last week’s Sun Tribune. I want to say that I just can't understand her frustration about promises made to constituents of Rep. Jay McNamar, because, you see, she isn’t one.
It would be difficult for any member of the state legislature, even her own husband (state Sen. Bill Ingebrigtsen), to make an electoral promise to anyone other than their own constituents. I wouldn’t expect her husband Sen. Ingebrigtsen to make electoral promises to me, because he is no longer my state senator.
I, along with many others, have been extremely pleased with Rep. McNamar’s service to our community. He has held true to every commitment he made to my neighbors and I. I’m pleased with the work he did this session to positively impact funding for nursing homes, hospitals, E-12 schools, and roads in our district. He also helped implement a freeze to sky-rocketing college tuition, and he forced our state colleges and universities to be more prudent with taxpayer dollars. Rep. McNamar and his colleagues in the Minnesota House passed bills to provide funding for veterans programs, new business development, job creation, lower property taxes, and yes, they did it by asking wealthy Minnesotans to pay a more progressive income tax.
I think Mrs. Ingebrigtsen would do well to focus less on the good work of our honorable state representative, and focus her opinions more on the supposed run for governor that her husband is attempting. She might find her input of greater use there, in District 8, where it belongs.
Surely there's something--stocking food shelves, quilting foot blankets, tending goats, or painting fog lines on county roads--that Mrs. Ingebrigtsen can find to occupy her time.
Photo: District 8 Senator Bill and Marilyn Ingebrigtsen (R-Alexandria), who share a senate district with HD8A state representative Bud Nornes (R-Fergus Falls) and HD8B state representative Mary Franson (R-Alexandria). HD12A state representive Jay McNamar (DFL-Elbow Lake) serves constituents with SD12 state senate Torrey Westrom (R-Elbow Lake).
If you enjoy reading posts like this on Bluestem Prairie, consider throwing some coin in the tip jar:
All of the statements, opinions, and views expressed on this site by Sally Jo Sorensen are solely her own, save when she attributes them to other sources.
The opinions, statements, and views of contributing writers are their own.
Sorensen, editor and proprietor of Bluestem Prairie, served as a New Media training and strategy consultant for the Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party from October 2009 through mid-April 2010. She now serves clients in the business and nonprofit sectors.
Recent Comments