« Voter restriction amendment author's hometown newspaper editorial board says send it back | Main | No pussy-footing Winona Daily News: "just call measure what it truly is: voter-suppression act" »

Oct 27, 2012

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Charlie Quimby

Curious that Quist is willing to speculate on the "hidden agenda" and declines to speculate on motives that might support his first speculation.

I'd be very interested if anyone has found any numbers guys out there who decline to get married because of the "marriage penalty." (Yes, I really love you honey, but oh, the taxes!)

It's really a confused argument, since guys like Quist are the ones who hew so tightly to traditional marriage and want divorce from the taxes.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Become a Fan

My Photo

My Other Accounts

Delicious Digg Facebook Flickr FriendFeed Google Plus Other... Twitter Twitter YouTube

Important Information

  • All of the statements, opinions, and views expressed on this site by Sally Jo Sorensen are solely her own, save when she attributes them to other sources.

    The opinions, statements, and views of contributing writers are their own.

    Sorensen, editor and proprietor of Bluestem Prairie, serves clients in the business and nonprofit sectors. While progressive in outlook, she does not caucus with any political party.

Bluestem Tweets

    follow me on Twitter
    Blog powered by Typepad