Watching the Minnesota House Environmental and Natural Resources Committee hear bills often seems like a visit to a parallel universe. As we go about our business in far west central Minnesota, buying baked goods (try the scones at Lingonberry in Ortonville), groceries, a fishing license and so forth, people want our natural world to be protected.
Not so with the majority leadership of the House committee, who rage against permitting and geese that poop (plenty of those around Big Stone Lake and the nearby federal wildlife area).
But it's not just us. The Minnesota Environmental Partnership just sent us a press release that reveals the dirty hippies of Big Stone County aren't alone in our nature-hugging attitudes:
At the same time when Minnesota Legislators are debating a torrent of rollbacks shows that Minnesotans of all backgrounds and regions are concerned about our environmental protections and don't want to see proposals that would roll back those protections.
The Minnesota Environmental Partnership (MEP) released a statewide public opinion research poll today. According to the results, nearly three in four Minnesotans (74%) are concerned about rollbacks of our law s that protect our land, air, and water.
"Over the past seven weeks, we've seen a torrent of proposals in the Minnesota Legislature rolling back our environmental safeguards that protect the air we breathe, water we drink, and land we use," said MEP Executive Director Steve Morse. "There have been dozens of proposed rollbacks to our water quality standards; clean, renewable energy systems; equitable transportation options; and more.
"Minnesota voters from all across the state are looking for bold leaders, who stand up for our natural resources, not ones who compromise our core Minnesota values."
The survey of 502 Minnesotans was conducted February 1-5, 2017, by a bipartisan team — Public Opinion Strategies, which conducts polling for Republican candidates, and Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin, Metz & Associates, which specializes in polling for Democratic candidates — includes a 5.3% margin of statewide sampling error.The poll conducted additional surveys in rural Minnesota to gain a more complete picture of public attitudes in these regions of the state.
The study found that:
Minnesotans broadly agree that we need more environmental protections, not fewer, with 62% agreeing that our environmental laws should be tougher or better enforced.
Statewide, 70% of voters would view their legislator less favorably if their legislator voted to weaken environmental laws. The study showed little difference in voters from rural Minnesota (69%) vs those from more urban areas (71%).
Water pollution and disappearing pollinators rank as Minnesota's most urgent environmental concerns.
The Clean Water, Land, and Legacy Amendment has seen growing overwhelming support. The Amendment passed with a 56-39 margin in 2008, and today, three out of four (75%) of Minnesotans support the Legacy Amendment.
81% of Minnesotans are concerned about runoff from farms polluting Minnesota's lakes, rivers, and streams.
83% of Minnesotans support the phasing out of the use of pesticides proven to harm pollinators.
We've downloaded the full poll and embed it below for our readers' easy access:
If you appreciate our posts and original analysis, you can mail contributions (payable to Sally Jo Sorensen, 33166 770th Ave, Ortonville, MN 56278).
Or you can contribute via this link to paypal; use email firstname.lastname@example.org as recipient.