Even when I disagree with the views of the Winona Daily News (like the paper's position on making Minnesota a right-to-work state), I enjoy reading the WDN's spirited editorials.
Take today's editorial, Our view: GOP definition of marriage is hateful, penned by editor Darrell Ehrlick for the board:
It would be funny if it wasn't so sad, not to mention hateful. A new Republican initiative seeks to define marriage only between a man and a woman. But it's so much easier to define marriage than admit bigotry, insensitivity and pandering to the worst kind of stereotypes.
With no end in sight to a record state budget deficit, the Republicans in the Legislature have seized on the opportunity to drive a wedge issue into the middle of what is already a tension-packed political climate.
Employing the typical "activist judges" bogeyman, the GOP wants to beat any judge to the punch and define marriage without a single shred of evidence telling the majority of straight Minnesotans how letting two consenting adults marry threatens them in any meaningful way.
Nor do the Republicans pushing this say why it's fair to let some people have a marriage license while others cannot for no other reason than genitalia.
Sorry, that's really what it boils down to.
Republicans pushing this don't like gay people. Instead, they would rather disguise their own prejudice in the form of legislation ... you know, protecting marriage and all. . . .
. . .The message the GOP is sending gays and lesbians could not be clearer.
We like you (or are at least forced to say that for the cameras) - just not as much as straight people.
This new movement isn't just legislation to define marriage.
It's legislation to prove we're bigoted.
This isn't Minnesota nice - it's Minnesota malicious.
In between, Ehrlick chronicles more substantial threats to marriage: divorce, the so-called "marriage penalty" in the tax code, a faltering economy, or "health care or any other number of topics that introduce stress into a relationship than whether two other people can or cannot obtain a piece of paper."
While the WDN may oppose the anti-gay amendment for the hate, I object even more for another reason. No, I don't appreciate it when my fellow Minnesotans say hateful things and act in hateful ways toward my lesbian and gay friends, especially those who are young people from small towns like the one I live in. It tramples on the general sweet and trusting nature these places can nurture when we do our best at bringing up kids, whomever they seek to embrace. Some take their own lives before they realize their own worth.
Nope, it's not the hate but the stupid.
The stupid that would impoverish both business and the creative human spirit gets to me most. Equality is an American value dear to me, but so is the freedom to dream, to invent, and to innovate. Being able to be a girl who could sass off--and write about it--helped me establish my own sense of equal value as the child of factory workers when I was growing up. Without the tools of the imagination and innovation, it's as hard to fight poverty, disease, and all the other woes that visit us as it is to combat hatefulness. Equality, fairness, decency and imagination: these are good for business (a good job is the best anti-poverty measure). These values are good for people.
And the stupid exacts a price from communities, while dampening a business climate. That's why I'm much more likely to advance the arguments put forth by Project 515, or labor leader Javier Morillo-Alicea, about the costs of anti-LGBT legislation to Minnesota than to dwell on hatefulness.
MPR reports about the economic costs of a same-sex marriage ban:
"With Minnesota competing or talent in other states and countries, a same-sex marriage ban would put the state at a competitive disadvantage," said Ann Kaner-Roth, executive director of Project 515. The group works to ensure that same-sex couples and their families have equal rights and considerations under Minnesota law.
Roth said many Minnesota companies already provide domestic partner benefits to their employees. She hopes to convince them to get more involved in the marriage issue.
"The corporate community has seen the value of creating an inclusive culture, and we hope that they'll bring that message to the Legislature," Roth said. "The public has been very clear in saying that they want to see the Legislature focus on jobs and the economy, and that is the key focus right now."
Stomp on the tolerant communities prefered by the creative class, and pay the price for a marriage monoculture.
It's not just the hate; it's the imbecility.
Photo: Marcus and Michele Bachmann at the Time influential people gala. Because everyone should have a marriage like Bachmann, who first spawned the marriage amendment while serving in the Minnesota senate, and her husband, "a Christian mental-health-therapist-helper-counselor who can wash that gay right out of your hair?" (April 26, 2011 - Photo by PacificCoastNews.com)

Recent Comments