Via Andy Birkey at the Minnesota Monitor, we learned that the National Journal has released its yearly vote ratings. The publication explains its system:
The ratings rank lawmakers on how they vote relative to each other on a conservative-to-liberal scale in both the Senate and the House. The scores are based on the members' votes in three areas: economic issues, social issues, and foreign policy.
Congressman Walz's ratings:
Liberal Ratings |
Conserv. Ratings |
Composite Score |
Composite Score |
|||||
Results from the House | E | S | F | E | S | F | Liberal | Conservative |
Walz, Tim, D-Minn.-1 | 69 | 58 | 63 | 28 | 41 | 35 | 64.3 | 35.7 |
To put Walz in context for Minnesota, here are the scores for the rest of our congressional delegation:
Kline, John, R-Minn.-2 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 90 | 91 | 72 | 9.3 | 90.7 |
Ramstad, Jim, R-Minn.-3 | 45 | 38 | 42 | 55 | 60 | 57 | 42.2 | 57.8 |
McCollum, Betty, D-Minn.-4 | 82 | 77 | 86 | 0 | 17 | 11 | 86.2 | 13.8 |
Ellison, Keith, D-Minn.-5 | 82 | 89 | 96 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 93.2 | 6.8 |
Bachmann, Michele, R-Minn.-6 | 6 | 9 | 0 | 93 | 85 | 72 | 10.8 | 89.2 |
Peterson, Collin, D-Minn.-7 | 52 | 50 | 52 | 47 | 49 | 47 | 51.8 | 48.2 |
Oberstar, James, D-Minn.-8 | 55 | 68 | 80 | 45 | 32 | 20 | 67.7 | 32.3 |
More details on the methodology are provided here by the National Journal. Back at the MinMon, Birkey notes recent Media Matters criticism of the method.
Comments