Bluestem Prairie

[VIDEO] In Granite Falls, MN SOS Simon shares quest for Election Day high turnout, low drama

Last week, Bluestem posted Meet MN Secretary of State Steve Simon at Granite Falls' Bluenose Gopher Public House 9/6. My beau and I did just that, traveling down the lovely Upper Minnesota River Valley roads to the Bluenose Gopher Public House, where grassroots environmental and civic action group CURE.

It was worth the drive.

At the Marshall Independent, Deb Gau reported on Tuesday in Simon hoping for ‘high turnout and low drama’ on Election Day:

 Election Day is only two months away, and it’s “crunch time” for the office that oversees Minnesota’s elections, Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon said.

At a visit to Granite Falls on Friday, Simon said he was hoping for good voter turnouts, and a smooth process at the election.

“That’s what I want, is high turnout and low drama,” Simon said.

Feelings around this year’s elections, especially the presidential election, will likely be intense, he said.

“Especially a presidential election, it’s always going to be intense,” Simon said. “It’s going to be especially intense when, like this year, people have very strong opinions about the candidates.”

Another thing adding to the intensity was that the presidential election was perceived as being a close race, he said. But he hoped that, in spite of that intensity, there would be no political violence or threats of violence.

“If any American has a problem with the certification of the election, or suspects or knows or think they know there was misconduct or illegal stuff going on, that’s fine. Bring your evidence, bring your witnesses, do your testimony, go to court. That’s where we resolve that stuff,” Simon said.

“But when the last court has issued the last ruling, we have to be done … And after that point, all of us as Americans have to get our arms around and accept the results, even if it didn’t go the way we want,” he said.

Simon was visiting Granite Falls as part of a statewide tour. He took questions from members of the public, and spoke about what his office does during Minnesota elections. . . .

Read the entire article at the Independent. Bluestem will post a video of the event here when it becomes available

Earlier on Friday, Simon sat down with a CURE staff for the interview embedded below. From the YouTube description:

Erik Hatlestad (Director of Cooperative Energy, CURE) sits down with Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon to discuss the 2024 election and rural democracy. Topics include the many ways Minnesotans can participate in elections, what resources are available to Minnesotans to access elections, and how to combat disinformation about election process and outcomes.

Visit CURE's Facebook page post embedded below for more about the event.

 

Photo: Erik Hatlestad, CURE's Director of Cooperative Energy, introduces Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon to the crowd of 50 people Friday afternoon at Granite Falls' cooperative Bluenose Gopher Public House.

Related posts

• Meet MN Secretary of State Steve Simon at Granite Falls' Bluenose Gopher Public House 9/6
• MN SOS: Secretary of State Steve Simon announces Minnesota Election Facts Webpage 
• MNGOP endorsed secretary of state candidate's election ignorance pairs well with past racism
• GOP SOS candidate we scolded for racism, incompetence gets antisemitism added
•  South Dakota's Republican Secretary of State Monae Johnson runs afoul of anti-abortion groups after labeling their phone calls a ‘scam’
• SD Searchlight: Incoming Secretary of State looks to hand-count ballots, audit each election 

If you appreciate Bluestem Prairie, you can mail contributions (payable to Sally Jo Sorensen, 600 Maple Street, Summit SD 57266) or use the paypal button in the upper right hand corner of this post. 

Or you can contribute via this link to paypal; use email [email protected] as recipient.

I'm on Venmo for those who prefer to use this service: @Sally-Sorensen-6

[VIDEO] Watch MNHouse 24B seat candidates Rep. Tina Liebling and Dan Sepeda debate

While the presidential debate has naturally captured voters' attention, forums between House candidates are starting up in Minnesota.

Witness the contests in the Rochester area. At the Post Bulletin, Brian Todd reports in Liebling, Sepeda clash over issues in first general election candidate forum:

The League of Women Voters Rochester will host candidate forums for all races ranging from school board to state representatives that will be on the ballots of Rochester area voters. Candidate forums are held at the Rochester Public Library auditorium, with livestreams and recordings available at the Rochester Public Library's YouTube channel and the LWV Rochester website . The complete list of candidate forums is below:

• • Wednesday, Sept. 11, from 6:30-7:30 p.m., doors open at 6 p.m. Minnesota Representative District 25A: Kim Hicks and Ken Navitsky.
  • Thursday, Sept. 12, from 6:30-7:30 p.m., doors open at 6 p.m. Minnesota Representative District 25B: Wes Lund and Andy Smith.
  • Monday, Sept. 16, from 6:30-7:30 p.m., doors open at 6 p.m. Minnesota Representative District 20B: Michael Hutchinson and Steve Jacob. . . .
  • Monday, Sept. 23, from 6:30-7:30 p.m., doors open at 6 p.m. Minnesota Representative District 24A: Heather Holmes and Duane Quam.

I'm especially looking forward to Thursday's debate between incumbent Andy Smith and gadfly Wes Lund, those Facebook page is now awash with Ohio pet reels and memes.

But I digress. One highlights from Todd's Liebling, Sepeda clash over issues in first general election candidate forum:

. . . When asked about the state's response to the EPA mandating action by the state to protect groundwater in the karst region, Liebling said polluters, which she said was mainly farmers, should pay for the cleanup. She said a tax on fertilizer was being considered and she hoped that could be worked out in the future.

Sepeda said government regulations often got in the way of growth and freedom. He said there are several sources that contribute to high nitrates in groundwater. . .. 

Read the entire article at the Post Bulletin. (A subscription to the Bulletin allows readers to access all Forum newspapers across the region. Quite the bargain for those hoping to keep up with North Dakota, South Dakota and greater Minnesota news).

Here's the YouTube of the debate:

Bluestem will be on the lookout for more greater Minnesota House race forums in the news.

Photo: Tina Liebling and Dan Sepeda during Tuesday's League of Women Voters forum at the Rochester Public Library. Maya Giron / Post Bulletin.

If you appreciate Bluestem Prairie, you can mail contributions (payable to Sally Jo Sorensen, 600 Maple Street, Summit SD 57266) or use the paypal button in the upper right hand corner of this post. 

Or you can contribute via this link to paypal; use email [email protected] as recipient.

I'm on Venmo for those who prefer to use this service: @Sally-Sorensen-6

 

Iowa Republican Legislative Intervenors for Justice to file lawsuits against Summit ethanol carbon pipeline decision

Just this morning, Bluestem Prairie republished an article from the North Dakota Monitor, North Dakota Public Service Commission staff outlines legal option for landowners in Summit ethanol carbon pipeline fight.

This afternoon, its States Newsroom sibling, the Iowa Capital Dispatch, published the article below.

Seems like Summit Carbon Solution's ethanol carbon pipeline project just can't get any respect these days.

Iowa Republicans to file lawsuits against Summit pipeline decision
by Cami Koons

A group of Iowa Republican lawmakers plans to ask federal and state courts to rule that the Iowa Utilities Commission acted illegally and unconstitutionally in its approval of a controversial pipeline project. 

The group of nearly 40 Iowa lawmakers comprising the Republican Legislative Intervenors for Justice announced their plan to sue in a news release Tuesday. 

The Summit Carbon Solutions pipeline, “prioritizes corporate interests in tax credits over the safety, property rights, and well-being of Iowa’s citizens,” according to a statement from the group.

The $8 billion carbon-capture pipeline project would connect to 57 ethanol plants and stretch across most of Iowa and into Nebraska, Minnesota, South Dakota and North Dakota.

The Iowa Utilities Commission approved the application in June, under the conditions that Summit Carbon Solutions submitted documentation of various regulating requirements, and a hefty insurance policy. 

The Iowa-based company met these requirements and was issued a construction permit by the commission at the end of August. However, Iowa construction cannot begin until the project is approved in the Dakotas, where it has also faced pushback from landowners and lawmakers.

In addition to the impending legal filings, the opposing group of legislators met to strategize upcoming legislative approaches, like eminent domain reform and adjusting the functions of the Iowa Utilities Commission, to stop the pipeline. 

The Iowa House has approved limits on eminent domain for carbon pipelines in recent years but the Senate has not acted.

“We are determined to fight this reckless decision in the courts and in the General Assembly,” Rep. Charley Thomson said in the press release. “This isn’t just about stopping one pipeline. It’s about safeguarding our communities, our land, and our constitutional rights from future overreach.”

This Iowa Capital Dispatch article is republished under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.

 

Photo:

 

Related posts

• North Dakota Public Service Commission staff outlines legal option for landowners in Summit ethanol carbon pipeline fight
• Livestreaming today at 1:30, ND regulators to hold work session to discuss Summit pipeline
• Summit Carbon Solutions pipelines won’t capture all carbon emitted by ethanol plants
• Breaking news: Iowa Utilities Commission issues ethanol carbon pipeline permit for Summit Carbon Solutions
• Ethanol carbon news digest: Summit Carbon pipeline in MN, Iowa & North Dakota media
• South Dakota Supreme Court ruling complicates Summit Carbon Solution’s push for land
• Public can comment on Otter Tail – Wilkin Co section of ethanol carbon pipeline until Sept. 11
• Summit Carbon Solutions CEO asks for prayer, while MN PUC wants public comment on FEIS of Otter Tail – Wilkin portion of CO2 Pipeline
• More carbon pipeline news: Summit jumpstarts pipeline efforts with purchase of old land easement agreements in Iowa
• IA Rep. Miller-Meeks says carbon pipelines will help Iowa ethanol industry stay competitive
• VIDEO: Carbon capture in Minnesota: public lands, fast money, and pipe dreams
• Summit pipeline segment enters final permitting stages in Minnesota; CURE raises objections
• Referred pipeline law puts Summit Carbon Solution's permit quest in limbo
• Carbon capture news from elsewhere: New Illinois law lays out safety requirements for future carbon sequestration projects
• Broad array of groups object to Summit pipeline permit approval by Iowa Utilities Commission
• Iowa ethanol carbon pipeline opponents poised for Summit Carbon Solutions permit challenges
• Breaking crowded South Dakota ballot news: carbon pipeline law referendum validated
• Sustainable jet fuel company Gevo contributes $167K in defense of carbon pipeline law
• South Dakota Property Rights and Local Control Alliance turns in petitions to SD Secretary of State to force a vote on carbon pipeline policy
• News digest: District 1, the edge of the primary election political earthquake in South Dakota
• South Dakota District 1 GOP House primary news round-up: carbon pipeline politics major issue
• New Midwest battles brew over CO2 pipelines
• Company behind proposed Lake Preston jet fuel plant buoyed by federal carbon credit ruling
• Ethanol carbon pipeline news digest: Gevo aviation fuel needs Summit Carbon Solutions and more!
• ND GOP resolution against CCS pipelines decries "false premise of looming climate apocalypse
• Summit Carbon Solutions says ethanol carbon pipeline system won’t be operational until 2026
• Some Iowa landowners were confused by Summit Carbon Solution eminent domain process
• Navigator CO2 pulls its ethanol carbon pipeline permit application in Illinois
• Ethanol carbon pipeline news digest: Gevo aviation fuel needs Summit Carbon Solutions and more!

If you appreciate Bluestem Prairie, you can mail contributions (payable to Sally Jo Sorensen, 600 Maple Street, Summit SD 57266) or use the paypal button in the upper right hand corner of this post. 

Or you can contribute via this link to paypal; use email [email protected] as recipient.

I'm on Venmo for those who prefer to use this service: @Sally-Sorensen-6

Southern MN GOP House candidate Erica Schwartz apologizes after implying Democrats are leading US towards another Holocaust

Another good catch in Minnesota House election coverage by the Minnesota Reformer. One would think a candidate might stick to criticizing her opponent's record, but Bluestem suspects attacking Jeff Brand's efforts against PFAS and such might not play too well.

GOP House candidate apologizes after implying Democrats are leading US towards another Holocaust
by Madison Mcvan

At a Republican fundraiser in Mankato, the candidate for Minnesota House District 18A, Erica Schwartz, gave a speech promising to promote tough-on-crime policies and advocate for lower taxes.

In a side conversation after the speech, Schwartz said Democrats are leading the U.S. towards another Holocaust, according to audio obtained by the Reformer.

Schwartz is running against DFL Rep. Jeff Brand to represent the swing district that includes north Mankato, Saint Peter and nearby townships.

Schwartz, in conversation with unidentified individuals, said she was interested in WWII history and took her daughter to visit the Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C.

“It was heartbreaking to see, but it’s also very much part of our ugly history that we have to remember to never do that again,” Schwartz said of the Holocaust. “And I just feel like we’re heading right back to all of that with what’s going on with the DFL, and what’s been going on with our country, with it being all Democratic from our president, all the way from our governor to our representatives in the state House.”

Schwartz continued: “They’re promoting all this transgender. You know, when I walk into my baby’s school, my kid’s school, I see that pride flag everywhere. Posters everywhere, hallways… but they took away the American flag.”

In a statement provided to the Reformer, Schwartz said she regrets the comments.  

“As a brand new candidate, I made an inartful comment trying to highlight some of the reasons I ran for office: my deep concern about the one-party control in Minnesota, and the increasingly hostile political environment where free speech is under attack and Americans are divided against each other. I regret making that comparison and will be better in the future about being more precise with my words,” Schwartz said.

Ethan Roberts, deputy director of Jewish Community Relations Council of Minnesota, said this isn’t the first time candidates or elected officials have made “wildly inappropriate” comparisons to the Holocaust. 

During the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, some Republicans likened public health measures — including mask mandates and school and business closures — to Nazi-era Germany. The 2022 Republican candidate for governor, Scott Jensen, implied that groups that resist government public health policies would help prevent a repeat of Nazism.

Schwartz’s comments come at a sensitive time for Jewish Americans, as reports of antisemitism on college campuses have risen in the wake of Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack on Israeli civilians and Israel’s ensuing bombardment of Gaza. 

“Whatever it is that you’re upset about, whatever it is that you think that our country is wrestling with, it’s not the Holocaust,” Roberts said.

This Minnesota Reformer article is republished online under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.

Photo: Erica Schwartz. Campaign photo, via Minnesota Reformer.

Related post

• MNHouse GOP swing seat candidate in April: "a whole lot of pro-abortion people need to go die or leave the state" for pro-life amendment to win

If you appreciate Bluestem Prairie, you can mail contributions (payable to Sally Jo Sorensen, 600 Maple Street, Summit SD 57266) or use the paypal button in the upper right hand corner of this post. 

Or you can contribute via this link to paypal; use email [email protected] as recipient.

I'm on Venmo for those who prefer to use this service: @Sally-Sorensen-6

 

North Dakota Public Service Commission staff outlines legal option for landowners in Summit ethanol carbon pipeline fight

Yet another story chronicling the struggle over ethanol carbon pipelines in the upper Midwest.

At the North Dakota Monitor, Jeff Beach reports an option is available for landowners who feel they were tricked or bullied into signing easement agreements with Summit Carbon Solutions for ethanol carbon pipelines. 

PSC staff outlines legal option for landowners in Summit pipeline fight
by Jeff Beach

North Dakota landowners who feel they were tricked or bullied into signing an easement agreement with Summit Carbon Solutions can appeal to the courts, according to staff for the Public Service Commission.

During a PSC work session Monday on the Summit siting permit, staff discussed the law that says if five or more landowners feel wronged by the negotiating tactics, they can file a complaint in district court. 

If the court sides with the landowners, the easement agreements can be thrown out.

During public hearings on Summit’s carbon capture pipeline project, landowners have complained that Summit agents threatened them with court action if they did not voluntarily sign an easement agreement giving Summit the right to put a pipeline through private property. 

They also have cited poor communication and sometimes communicating with the wrong family member on easement negotiations. 

According to Century Code 49-22.1-14, “If at least five landowners aggrieved by the conduct of a person or persons acting on behalf of the same utility, acquiring easements for a site a relevant facility, alleged use of harassment, misrepresentation, deception, fraud, or other unfair tactics by the person and persons acquiring or attempting to acquire easement and action may be brought to the appropriate District Court.” 

“It covers, it seems like, just about everything we’ve been hearing about all along that is supposedly happening,” PSC Chair Randy Christmann said of landowner complaints about Summit. “There’s a process for it.” 

The law adds that if the court rules in favor of the landowners, the PSC may revoke or suspend the route permit affecting the landowners who proved that they were wronged. 

Victor Shock, director of public utilities for the commission, noted that the commission doesn’t have jurisdiction over easement negotiations. “But that is something that the court could do,” Shock said. 

PSC attorney Zack Pelham said the law has been in place since 2017. He said he was unsure if there had been previous versions of the statute. 

Iowa-based Summit Carbon Solutions has been pursuing a pipeline route permit in North Dakota since 2022. It seeks to capture carbon emissions from ethanol plants in five states and use the pipeline to bring carbon dioxide to North Dakota for underground storage.  

But Summit has faced opposition and legal action from some landowners.

The PSC in 2023 denied Summit a route permit but allowed the company to revise its application and go through a second round of public hearings. 

Monday’s work session was a chance for the three-person commission to discuss the law covering negotiation tactics and other legal matters related to the pipeline as the PSC weighs a decision on the permit. 

The commission directed its staff to ask for more detailed information on Summit’s insurance policies. 

Another PSC work session on the pipeline was tentatively set for 9:30 a.m. Sept. 16, in the Brynhild Haugland Room at the Capitol. Christmann said in an interview last week he anticipates multiple work sessions on the project before the PSC will be prepared to vote on the permit.

This North Dakota Monitor article is republished online under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.

Photo: Members of the public review maps on display April 22, 2024, that show the Summit Carbon Solutions pipeline route ahead of a Public Service Commission meeting in Mandan. (Kyle Martin/For the North Dakota Monitor).

Related posts

• Livestreaming today at 1:30, ND regulators to hold work session to discuss Summit pipeline
• Summit Carbon Solutions pipelines won’t capture all carbon emitted by ethanol plants
• Breaking news: Iowa Utilities Commission issues ethanol carbon pipeline permit for Summit Carbon Solutions
• Ethanol carbon news digest: Summit Carbon pipeline in MN, Iowa & North Dakota media
• South Dakota Supreme Court ruling complicates Summit Carbon Solution’s push for land
• Public can comment on Otter Tail – Wilkin Co section of ethanol carbon pipeline until Sept. 11
• Summit Carbon Solutions CEO asks for prayer, while MN PUC wants public comment on FEIS of Otter Tail – Wilkin portion of CO2 Pipeline
• More carbon pipeline news: Summit jumpstarts pipeline efforts with purchase of old land easement agreements in Iowa
• IA Rep. Miller-Meeks says carbon pipelines will help Iowa ethanol industry stay competitive
• VIDEO: Carbon capture in Minnesota: public lands, fast money, and pipe dreams
• Summit pipeline segment enters final permitting stages in Minnesota; CURE raises objections
• Referred pipeline law puts Summit Carbon Solution's permit quest in limbo
• Carbon capture news from elsewhere: New Illinois law lays out safety requirements for future carbon sequestration projects
• Broad array of groups object to Summit pipeline permit approval by Iowa Utilities Commission
• Iowa ethanol carbon pipeline opponents poised for Summit Carbon Solutions permit challenges
• Breaking crowded South Dakota ballot news: carbon pipeline law referendum validated
• Sustainable jet fuel company Gevo contributes $167K in defense of carbon pipeline law
• South Dakota Property Rights and Local Control Alliance turns in petitions to SD Secretary of State to force a vote on carbon pipeline policy
• News digest: District 1, the edge of the primary election political earthquake in South Dakota
• South Dakota District 1 GOP House primary news round-up: carbon pipeline politics major issue
• New Midwest battles brew over CO2 pipelines
• Company behind proposed Lake Preston jet fuel plant buoyed by federal carbon credit ruling
• Ethanol carbon pipeline news digest: Gevo aviation fuel needs Summit Carbon Solutions and more!
• ND GOP resolution against CCS pipelines decries "false premise of looming climate apocalypse
• Summit Carbon Solutions says ethanol carbon pipeline system won’t be operational until 2026
• Some Iowa landowners were confused by Summit Carbon Solution eminent domain process
• Navigator CO2 pulls its ethanol carbon pipeline permit application in Illinois
• Ethanol carbon pipeline news digest: Gevo aviation fuel needs Summit Carbon Solutions and more!

If you appreciate Bluestem Prairie, you can mail contributions (payable to Sally Jo Sorensen, 600 Maple Street, Summit SD 57266) or use the paypal button in the upper right hand corner of this post. 

Or you can contribute via this link to paypal; use email [email protected] as recipient.

I'm on Venmo for those who prefer to use this service: @Sally-Sorensen-6

MNHouse GOP swing seat candidate in April: "a whole lot of pro-abortion people need to go die or leave the state" for pro-life amendment to win

Just in this morning at the Minnesota Reformer: a look behind the scenes in a swing seat that will help determine control of the Minnesota House, on an issue that matters to Minnesota voters.

Consider a donation to the Reformer to help pay for its valuable journalism.  

Swing seat GOP candidate would support Constitutional abortion ban ‘in a heartbeat’
by Christopher Ingraham

35B candidate Steve Pape has called himself a social moderate’

The Republican candidate for the open House seat in district 35B told supporters at a campaign kickoff event in April that he would support an amendment to the state Constitution to restrict abortion, according to event audio obtained by the Reformer.

“I would get behind that in a heartbeat if it had any chance at all to win,” Steve Pape, an engineer and Vietnam veteran from Coon Rapids, told an event attendee who asked about it.

Pape identifies as a “social moderate” and studiously avoids any mention of abortion on his campaign website. He also hasn’t spoken about the topic in interviews with conservative or mainstream news organizations, a tacit acknowledgement that the issue could be fraught in one of the state’s most narrowly divided districts. In 2022, outgoing DFL Rep. Jerry Newton won it by just 232 votes. 

But in April, Pape said that he is “strongly, 100% pro-life,” and that abortion is an issue that motivated him to run because it feels like “one knife cut of a thousand to kill America.”

The contrast between the event remarks and his public silence on the issue underscore the degree to which Republicans are now playing defense following the U.S. Supreme Court Dobbs decision that led to abortion bans around the country. 

A majority of Americans oppose the Dobbs ruling, and Republican standard bearer Donald Trump has recently made conflicting comments about his abortion views.

The Minnesota Supreme Court affirmed the right to an abortion in a 1995 ruling, which the Legislature then codified with strong statutory abortion rights language in 2023. 

Pape noted that any significant restrictions would likely require a state Constitutional amendment.

“We would have to surmount that problem,” Pape said. “Not saying it’s not possible, but I’m saying that a whole lot of pro-abortion people need to go die or leave the state.”

Surveys show about two-thirds of Minnesotans say abortion should be legal in all or most cases.

“I want nothing more than to go back where we were 20 years ago,” Pape said, “but it’s not an easy path.”

Given the difficulties of changing the Constitution, Pape said a more incremental approach might yield more favorable results for anti-abortion Minnesotans: “It’s gonna take literally decades to chip away at it until we get back.”

If a referendum isn’t possible, “What’s the next best thing we can do? How can we inch ourselves closer to the goal?” he asked. “We literally need the process going, where we start pushing it back, and you have to push it back one brushfire at a time.”

Pape speculated that an abortion ban after 21 weeks gestational age might have the best chance of passing. “What if we just said we’re gonna change the law so instead of getting an abortion right up until the day the baby is born, we said you can only have an abortion up to the 21st week, which is about halfway, and nothing beyond that?”

Abortions after the 28th week of pregnancy are vanishingly rare, and when they do happen are typically the result of tragic medical complications. Abortions “moments before birth” do not occur; so-called partial-birth abortions have been illegal in the United States for more than 15 years.  

In Minnesota, the overwhelming majority of abortions happen in the first trimester, according to state data. In 2022, the most recent year with complete data, just one abortion occurred in the third trimester, at the 32nd week.

Reached for comment, Pape claimed that the remarks were “misinformation,” that they were taken “totally out of context,” and that they do not express his views. He went on to repeat the falsehood about “pulling a baby from the mother’s womb the day before it’s born,” and accused a Reformer reporter of supporting infanticide.

After being sent audio of the remarks, Pape did not deny that he made them but said, “I do not recall making the comments voiced on the recording.” He added that “as a legislator I will work to support mothers and support life.”

The DFL candidate in the race, Coon Rapids City Council Member Kari Rehrauer, said, “My opponent wants to drag us back 50 years, not just 20. I will never stop fighting to ensure women maintain their rights in Minnesota.”

In Minnesota, 2022 gubernatorial candidate Scott Jensen said his campaign promise to ban nearly all abortions cost him that race. Democrats have sought to put the issue at the top of voters’ minds in 2024.

This Minnesota Reformer article is republished online under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. 

Photo: The Minnesota Capitol Building. Courtesy of Minnesota House Public Information Services.

If you appreciate Bluestem Prairie, you can mail contributions (payable to Sally Jo Sorensen, 600 Maple Street, Summit SD 57266) or use the paypal button in the upper right hand corner of this post. 

Or you can contribute via this link to paypal; use email [email protected] as recipient.

I'm on Venmo for those who prefer to use this service: @Sally-Sorensen-6

Livestreaming today at 1:30, ND regulators to hold work session to discuss Summit pipeline

In North Dakota today, North Dakota Public Service Commission will host a work session in Pioneer Room of the Capitol that will be livestreamed and open to the public although the Commission won't be taking public comments.

Yet another wrinkle to the multi-state saga of the sprawling spider of ethanol carbon pipelines that Summit Carbon Solutions hopes to build in its pursuit of those federal tax credits for capturing some carbon produced by the ethanol industry.  As was noted here on Sunday, Summit Carbon Solutions pipelines won’t capture all carbon emitted by ethanol plants.

A staff report republished from the North Dakota Monitor.

North Dakota regulators set work session to discuss Summit pipeline

The North Dakota Public Service Commission has scheduled a work session for 1:30 p.m. Monday to discuss the proposed Summit Carbon Solutions pipeline.

The session in the Pioneer Room of the Capitol is open to the public but will not include an opportunity for public comment. Commissioners will discuss the project with staff and legal counsel, but they are not expected to make a decision on the permit application.

The three-member commission denied a permit for the proposed pipeline last year. The commission held another series of public meetings this spring after Summit revised its permit application.

Summit has made changes to the pipeline route in North Dakota, moving farther away from Bismarck in response to landowners concerns. The company also made changes to avoid landslide and wildlife areas. The project continued to draw strong opposition from some landowners during the most recent public hearings.

PSC chair Randy Christmann said he anticipates the commission will need more than one work session to discuss the project before members can consider taking a vote. 

“I really want to have a thorough discussion of everything,” he said.

The $8 billion project would capture carbon emissions from 57 ethanol plants in five states. The CO2 would be piped to an underground storage area northwest of Bismarck. 

A livestream of the work session also will be available.

Meanwhile, a public comment period for a small section of pipeline proposed for western Minnesota continues through Sept. 11. 

This North Dakota Monitor article is republished online under  Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. 

Photo: Public Service Commission Chair Randy Christmann, right, asks questions April 22, 2024, during a public hearing on the Summit Carbon Solutions pipeline. At left is Commissioner Sheri Haugen-Hoffart. (Kyle Martin/For the North Dakota Monitor).

Related posts

• Summit Carbon Solutions pipelines won’t capture all carbon emitted by ethanol plants
• Breaking news: Iowa Utilities Commission issues ethanol carbon pipeline permit for Summit Carbon Solutions
• Ethanol carbon news digest: Summit Carbon pipeline in MN, Iowa & North Dakota media
• South Dakota Supreme Court ruling complicates Summit Carbon Solution’s push for land
• Public can comment on Otter Tail – Wilkin Co section of ethanol carbon pipeline until Sept. 11
• Summit Carbon Solutions CEO asks for prayer, while MN PUC wants public comment on FEIS of Otter Tail – Wilkin portion of CO2 Pipeline
• More carbon pipeline news: Summit jumpstarts pipeline efforts with purchase of old land easement agreements in Iowa
• IA Rep. Miller-Meeks says carbon pipelines will help Iowa ethanol industry stay competitive
• VIDEO: Carbon capture in Minnesota: public lands, fast money, and pipe dreams
• Summit pipeline segment enters final permitting stages in Minnesota; CURE raises objections
• Referred pipeline law puts Summit Carbon Solution's permit quest in limbo
• Carbon capture news from elsewhere: New Illinois law lays out safety requirements for future carbon sequestration projects
• Broad array of groups object to Summit pipeline permit approval by Iowa Utilities Commission
• Iowa ethanol carbon pipeline opponents poised for Summit Carbon Solutions permit challenges
• Breaking crowded South Dakota ballot news: carbon pipeline law referendum validated
• Sustainable jet fuel company Gevo contributes $167K in defense of carbon pipeline law
• South Dakota Property Rights and Local Control Alliance turns in petitions to SD Secretary of State to force a vote on carbon pipeline policy
• News digest: District 1, the edge of the primary election political earthquake in South Dakota
• South Dakota District 1 GOP House primary news round-up: carbon pipeline politics major issue
• New Midwest battles brew over CO2 pipelines
• Company behind proposed Lake Preston jet fuel plant buoyed by federal carbon credit ruling
• Ethanol carbon pipeline news digest: Gevo aviation fuel needs Summit Carbon Solutions and more!
• ND GOP resolution against CCS pipelines decries "false premise of looming climate apocalypse
• Summit Carbon Solutions says ethanol carbon pipeline system won’t be operational until 2026
• Some Iowa landowners were confused by Summit Carbon Solution eminent domain process
• Navigator CO2 pulls its ethanol carbon pipeline permit application in Illinois
• Ethanol carbon pipeline news digest: Gevo aviation fuel needs Summit Carbon Solutions and more!

If you appreciate Bluestem Prairie, you can mail contributions (payable to Sally Jo Sorensen, 600 Maple Street, Summit SD 57266) or use the paypal button in the upper right hand corner of this post. 

Or you can contribute via this link to paypal; use email [email protected] as recipient.

I'm on Venmo for those who prefer to use this service: @Sally-Sorensen-6

 

Summit Carbon Solutions pipelines won’t capture all carbon emitted by ethanol plants

Yet another look from the South Dakota Searchlight at the ethanol carbon pipeline system proposed by Summit Carbon Solutions across the upper Midwest.

A good moment to remind readers that comments on the Minnesota Department of Commerce Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for a route permit for the Otter Tail to Wilkin County portion of Summit Carbon Solutions proposed CO₂ pipeline and Carbon Capture project in Minnesota.

To do so, follow the links in this X post by rural environment and energy action group CURE:

Time is running out! You have just one week to submit your comments on the Summit CO2 Pipeline FEIS. Don't miss this chance to share your concerns and make your voice heard—act now!https://t.co/FVWKS0G2SB

— CURE (@CURE_mn) September 4, 2024

That notice is just for the Otter Tail to Wilkin County portion of the pipeline. The article below, republished from South Dakota Searchlight, addresses an issue with the entire project.

Pipeline won’t capture all carbon emitted by ethanol plants
by Joshua Haiar

Corn fermentation emissions would be sequestered, but emissions from gas-powered machinery would go into the atmosphere

A company proposing an $8 billion carbon dioxide pipeline through eastern South Dakota says the project would be good for the environment.

The claim is based on the heat-trapping carbon dioxide emitted by ethanol plants that would be captured, transported by the pipeline and stored underground in North Dakota.

“This carbon capture and storage project will have the capacity to prevent the release of 18 million metric tons of CO2 to the atmosphere every year,” says the project website, “or the equivalent of removing the annual CO2 emissions of 4 million vehicles from our roads.”

While that’s true, participating ethanol plants could still emit about 7 million metric tons of additional carbon dioxide annually. That’s because the pipeline would only capture some — not all — of the CO2 emitted by the plants. 

When ethanol plants turn corn into a gasoline additive, they produce two kinds of CO2 emissions: the kind emitted by fossil fuels used to power industrial equipment, such as boilers and grain dryers, and the kind emitted by corn during fermentation.

Summit Carbon Solutions’ pipeline would capture carbon dioxide from corn fermentation. The CO2 emitted by gas-powered machines would be released to the atmosphere.

“So, there are still existing emissions associated with corn ethanol that aren’t being neutralized here,” said Daniel Sanchez, an assistant professor at the University of California-Berkeley’s Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management.

Sanchez said capturing CO2 emissions from industrial equipment, like boilers and grain dryers, is more expensive than capturing fermentation emissions. Industrial machinery uses a lot of natural gas, which releases more than CO2 when burned as fuel. He said it requires extra processes to separate that CO2 from water vapor and other gases.

Iowa-based Summit has partnered with ethanol producers including Poet and Valero to capture fermentation-produced CO2 at 57 ethanol plants in South Dakota and several other states and store it underground in North Dakota. The project, which has not yet gained a permit from South Dakota regulators, would capitalize on federal tax credits that are intended to incentivize the prevention of greenhouse gas emissions.

Amount of fermentation emissions unknown

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency only reports the amount of carbon dioxide that ethanol plants emit from gas-powered processes. Seven million metric tons was the approximate sum of those emissions from the 57 Summit-partnered ethanol plants in 2022.

The EPA does not report the amount of corn-fermentation carbon dioxide emitted. That’s because fermentation emissions are considered cyclical. Corn pulls carbon dioxide out of the air as it grows in a cornfield. Then it releases carbon dioxide back to the atmosphere as it ferments in an ethanol plant. Finally, farmers plant more corn, and the cycle continues.

Summit declined to release amounts of CO2 emitted from corn fermentation at its 57 partner ethanol plants. Ben Nelson, Summit’s director of carbon programs, said a typical 100-million-gallon plant produces about 286,000 metric tons of fermentation CO2. 

Sanchez, of California-Berkeley, said “modern and efficient” ethanol plants emit about 90,000 metric tons of fermentation CO2. 

The diverging estimates mean the Summit pipeline and its 57 partner plants could capture anywhere from 5 million to 16 million metric tons of fermentation CO2 annually — both of which are within the pipeline’s proposed capacity of 18 million metric tons. 

For comparison, approximately 1,300 power plants across the U.S. emitted about 1.5 billion metric tons of CO2 in 2022.

“This is both a giant pipeline project and a drop in the bucket,” Sanchez said.

Aiming for net-negative

Sanchez added that if an ethanol plant replaces its natural gas use with something sustainable, while also capturing and storing its fermentation CO2 emissions, it can pull more greenhouse gases out of the atmosphere than are released in the production lifecycle of ethanol associated with the plant.

Nelson pointed to a 2022 report for the Renewable Fuels Association that said ethanol production could reach net-negative emissions by 2040. The report indicates carbon sequestration at ethanol plants would make the biggest difference – a bigger difference than industry-wide implementation of farming practices that sequester more carbon in the soil, such as less disruptive tillage practices and planting cover crops.  

Nelson said the average ethanol plant emits about 55 grams of CO2 per megajoule (a unit of energy) of ethanol produced, and Summit’s project would lower that to about 25 grams of CO2.

“Achieving net-negative emissions will also require other efforts such as climate-smart farming, using renewable natural gas, renewable electricity at ethanol plants, and improving plant efficiency,” Nelson said. 

In South Dakota, some ethanol plants are already receiving what’s been coined “renewable natural gas” derived from landfill emissions, and a Brookings area utility company is sending the methane emitted from dairy livestock manure to be mixed into regional natural gas supplies. 

This South Dakota Searchlight article is republished online under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. 

Photo: The Poet Biorefining ethanol plant in Chancellor, pictured on Sept. 6, 2024. (Joshua Haiar/South Dakota Searchlight)

Related posts

• Breaking news: Iowa Utilities Commission issues ethanol carbon pipeline permit for Summit Carbon Solutions
• Ethanol carbon news digest: Summit Carbon pipeline in MN, Iowa & North Dakota media
• South Dakota Supreme Court ruling complicates Summit Carbon Solution’s push for land
• Public can comment on Otter Tail – Wilkin Co section of ethanol carbon pipeline until Sept. 11
• Summit Carbon Solutions CEO asks for prayer, while MN PUC wants public comment on FEIS of Otter Tail – Wilkin portion of CO2 Pipeline
• More carbon pipeline news: Summit jumpstarts pipeline efforts with purchase of old land easement agreements in Iowa
• IA Rep. Miller-Meeks says carbon pipelines will help Iowa ethanol industry stay competitive
• VIDEO: Carbon capture in Minnesota: public lands, fast money, and pipe dreams
• Summit pipeline segment enters final permitting stages in Minnesota; CURE raises objections
• Referred pipeline law puts Summit Carbon Solution's permit quest in limbo
• Carbon capture news from elsewhere: New Illinois law lays out safety requirements for future carbon sequestration projects
• Broad array of groups object to Summit pipeline permit approval by Iowa Utilities Commission
• Iowa ethanol carbon pipeline opponents poised for Summit Carbon Solutions permit challenges
• Breaking crowded South Dakota ballot news: carbon pipeline law referendum validated
• Sustainable jet fuel company Gevo contributes $167K in defense of carbon pipeline law
• South Dakota Property Rights and Local Control Alliance turns in petitions to SD Secretary of State to force a vote on carbon pipeline policy
• News digest: District 1, the edge of the primary election political earthquake in South Dakota
• South Dakota District 1 GOP House primary news round-up: carbon pipeline politics major issue
• New Midwest battles brew over CO2 pipelines
• Company behind proposed Lake Preston jet fuel plant buoyed by federal carbon credit ruling
• Ethanol carbon pipeline news digest: Gevo aviation fuel needs Summit Carbon Solutions and more!
• ND GOP resolution against CCS pipelines decries "false premise of looming climate apocalypse
• Summit Carbon Solutions says ethanol carbon pipeline system won’t be operational until 2026
• Some Iowa landowners were confused by Summit Carbon Solution eminent domain process
• Navigator CO2 pulls its ethanol carbon pipeline permit application in Illinois
• Ethanol carbon pipeline news digest: Gevo aviation fuel needs Summit Carbon Solutions and more!

If you appreciate Bluestem Prairie, you can mail contributions (payable to Sally Jo Sorensen, 600 Maple Street, Summit SD 57266) or use the paypal button in the upper right hand corner of this post. 

Or you can contribute via this link to paypal; use email [email protected] as recipient.

I'm on Venmo for those who prefer to use this service: @Sally-Sorensen-6

Lost in Prinsburg: former New Republican MNHouse member Tim Miller leaves PLAM Action, moves family into RV

Bluestem Prairie last covered former New Republican state representative Tim Miller in  MNHouse Republicans falsely claim schools are providing litter boxes for kids identifying as cats and  Retiring state rep Miller to push unconstitutional local ordinances for new PLAM Action job.

He's back in the news, with a career and lifestyle change. Willmar Radio report in Tim Miller, family decide to live in their RV:

 Former state lawmaker and pro-life activist Tim Miller no longer calls Prinsburg his home. Miller, 58, says he and his wife Cherie have made the decision to sell their house and live in a fifth-wheel recreational vehicle. Miller says they first became interested in the RV lifestyle in 2020 and bought a Class C Motorhome in St. Cloud. He says in August they traded it in for the fifth-wheeler...

Miller recently left his job at PLAM Action and is studying to become an RV technician . . . 

Is it a remake of Albert Brooks' classic 1985 road comedy, Lost in America? Apparently not, as his wife, a highly respected nursing instructor at Ridgewater College, is keeping her job:

...Miller says they are still working out where they will live in the winter, and where they will park their RV locally while Cherie continues to work at Ridgewater College. He says he's glad to be out of the legislature, and says his stress level is much lower. Miller says people get too worked up over politics...

This certainly is a career shift for Miller. From Tim Miller for MN House HD17A (2014):

My professional career has taken me to many places with a whole lot of experiences.  However, fundamentally, I have spent the majority of my adult life as an independent business owner.  I owned a paint contractor business for over ten years called Signature Painting.  I transitioned from that into a profession I love – non-profit and business development.  I have served many non-profit organizations including: the University of Minnesota; Central Minnesota Christian School, Prinsburg; multiple crisis pregnancy centers, and other community driven charities.  I have also worked closely on projects with for profit companies including Willmar Poultry, Minnwest Technology Campus, and Feedlogic. My experience includes work in agriculture, renewable energy, housing advocacy, and education.  I have a keen understanding of strategic planning and capital fund raising.  I understand how businesses succeed and what their challenges are.  I intend to use my professional experience in St. Paul for the benefit of West-central Minnesota.

Bluestem is happy Mr. Miller continues to grow as a person. Just as he left the Republican Minnesota House Caucus to form the now-defunct New Republican Caucus, this guy is capable of change.

Image: From Rotten Tomatoes "Lost in America" page.

Related posts

• Star Tribune editorial board praises Prinsburg for rejecting Miller's post-legislative career builder
• Prinsburg rejects PLAM ordinance update: tasty tidbits from the latest Star Tribune coverage
• West Central Tribune: City Council in Prinsburg, MN rejects proposed abortion ordinance
• Forum News Service: Prinsburg's Texas pro-life hold 'em ordinance gets more ink
• StribGuy: Small Minnesota town may become focus of abortion fight 'cause of Tim Miller
• MN News Network: Prinsburg in west-central MN is “launch site” for new anti-abortion strategy
• Tuesday, Prinsburg City Council heard Tim Miller propose PLAM Action anti-abortion ordinance
• Retiring state rep Miller to push unconstitutional local ordinances for new PLAM Action job.
• Tall grass prairie? State representative Tim Miller goes to Moorhead for grassroots organizing
• Retiring Rep. Tim Miller will work for Brian Gibson at Pro-Life Action Ministries sister group
• We won't have Tim Miller to kick around anymore--at least as a MN House member
• New House Republican Tim Miller shares unique understanding of gas tax in legislative update
• State rep Tim Miller: MN state public officials beholden to radical anti-livestock enviro groups 

If you appreciate Bluestem Prairie, you can mail contributions (payable to Sally Jo Sorensen, 600 Maple Street, Summit SD 57266) or use the paypal button in the upper right hand corner of this post.

Or you can contribute via this link to paypal; use email [email protected] as recipient.

I'm also on Venmo for those who prefer to use this service: @Sally-Sorensen-6

Rosebud Sioux Tribe gets nearly $8 million from federal program that South Dakota shunned

Back in late Auguest, Bluestem had republished a South Dakota Searchlight article Noem rejects more than $70 million in federal funds for energy and environmental programs.

Sad.

Now the Searchlight has pointed out in a quick read one of the advantages of tribal sovereignty.

Tribe gets nearly $8 million from federal program that state shunned
by Searchlight Staff

A Native American tribe in South Dakota will receive a nearly $8 million grant from a federal program that state government declined to apply for.

The Environmental Protection Agency announced Thursday that the Rosebud Sioux Tribe has been selected to receive a $7.88 million Climate Pollution Reduction Grant. The tribe will use the money to install electric-vehicle charging stations, purchase electric buses for transit routes and purchase and operate a heavy-duty EV garbage truck.

“This is a great opportunity for the Rosebud Sioux Tribe,” said Ivan Crow Eagle, the tribe’s environmental director, in a news release from the EPA.

States and major cities were also eligible for grants. South Dakota and Sioux Falls chose not to apply. A Sioux Falls official said at the time that the grants “have numerous requirements that would ultimately take away the focus from the city’s current and planned sustainability efforts.” A spokesman for Gov. Kristi Noem’s administration said more federal spending would make inflation worse and said the federal dollars would come with “strings attached.”

Rapid City obtained a $1 million planning grant but was not awarded an implementation grant.

The Rosebud Sioux Tribe’s grant is from the latest phase of nearly $5 billion in total awards by the program. The grants are funded by the Inflation Reduction Act that Congress passed and President Joe Biden signed in 2022.

Grants for tribes and territories were awarded following a review of 110 applications that requested a total of more than $1.3 billion.

This South Dakota Searchlight article is republished under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.

Photo:  Rosebud Sioux Tribal Headquarters in Rosebud. (Makenzie Huber/South Dakota Searchlight).

Related posts

• South Dakota's Kristi Noem not alone: states pledged hundreds of troops and spent millions to help Texas at the border so far this year
•  Grumpy cats: South Dakota Republicans criticize program that provided $3.8 billion to state 
• South Dakota News Watch: How South Dakota spent $14 billion of federal pandemic relief 

If you appreciate Bluestem Prairie, you can mail contributions (payable to Sally Jo Sorensen, 600 Maple Street, Summit SD 57266) or use the paypal button in the upper right hand corner of this post. 

Or you can contribute via this link to paypal; use email [email protected] as recipient.

I'm on Venmo for those who prefer to use this service: @Sally-Sorensen-6