Congressional candidates have until January 31 to file their year-end Federal Election Commission (FEC) reports that cover the last three months of the year 2009, but some candidates' committees routinely file their reports early. One such committee has been that of Randy Demmer, who kept his committee intact after his failure to capture the Republican endorsement in 2008. Instead, Brian Davis took the honor of being drubbed at the polls by Congressman Walz.
Demmer is seeking the endorsement again, and so I checked Demmer's records at the FEC site earlier this week to see if he had gotten a jump on the deadline again in reporting this final quarter. After all, Demmer's committee had filed its 2008 year-end report on January 13, 2009. At the end of 2008, Demmer's committee reported a cash balance of $99.25, while owing $135,150.00 in debts and obiligations, according to page 2 of the report. On pages 3 and 4, readers learn that the candidate loaned his committee $155,150.00 and the committee repaid him $20,000.
While there's no year-end report yet, I did find three amended reports: an April 2009 quarterly report covering the period from January 1-March 31, 2009; a July 2009 quarterly report covering April 1 though June 30, and the October 2009 quarterly report, from August 1 through September 30.
The original reports are still available online: the first April 2009 report, the first July 2009 report, and the first October 2009 report.
Ordinarily, amended reports are no big deal, and I nearly overlooked clicking on the links to the files, but I'm glad I did. The fun begins with the amended April 2009 quarterly report.
Here's how: at the bottom of page 4 of the amended April 2009 quarterly report, the committee's cash on hand at the beginning of the reporting period, i.e., on January 1, 2009, is listed as $135,249.25.
In all of the amended reports, the "debts and obiligations" line--loans owed to the candidate from the 20007-2008 cycle--remains at $135,150.
That's a remarkable jump from the cash on hand that the committee report that it had on December 31, 2008, according to the 2008 year-end report filed on January 13, 2009. As I noted above, that figure was $99.25.
Where did the instant cash come from? Apparently not another loan from the candidate, if the reports are accurate.
Looking at earlier reports on file for 2008 isn't helpful. The Demmer campaign had $108.25 in the bank on September 30, 2008, according to its October 2008 quarterly report. The campaign had $217.25 on June 30, 2008, according to its July 2008 quarterly report.
Will amended reports correcting the 2008 documents--that explain where the money came from--be forthcoming from the Demmer campaign? Or will we see yet another set of amended reports showing a much smaller cash on hand balance?
If Demmer's committee did indeed have over $135,000 in the bank for all of 2009, how did the treasurer overlook this money?
On December 10, 2009, the FEC did request further information, asking the campaign file a missing schedule on the status of the earlier loans. The loans remain unfulfilled.
Will the press look carefully at Demmer's odd reports--or simply gleeful note a cash-on-hand balance that--in the existing FEC reports at least--may not have the most reliable provenance? Where did that money come from? Or is it phantom money created by a bookeeping error? I hope the campaign can clarify these mysteries.
Recent Comments