« Getting medieval: random ballot draw already picked winner in Meeker County board race | Main | No retreat, no surrender: Allen Quist doubles down on food support in Farm Bill kvetching »

Nov 21, 2012


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Mike Worcester

Ignoring for sake of argument what state law says they must do, was there any other remedy available that would have made up for the election judges' unfortunate errors? Was their any possible way to pull the ballots that were given in error to voters? Or is that simply not possible to do.

I find this all very distasteful to be honest. But at the same time, am not sure what the better option would be.

Editor: actually, no, there's no way of telling. As for other options, the judge reviewed them after hearing arguments from both sides yesterday morning. One conservative blogger has suggested ending secret ballots entirely, a curious reversal of the logic used against the Employee Free Choice Act, which would allow unions to use majority sign-up elections to organize workplaces. I don't have an answer.

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Other Accounts

Important Information

  • All of the statements, opinions, and views expressed on this site by Sally Jo Sorensen are solely her own, save when she attributes them to other sources.

    The opinions, statements, and views of contributing writers are their own.

    Sorensen, editor and proprietor of Bluestem Prairie, serves clients in the business and nonprofit sectors. While progressive in outlook, she does not caucus with any political party.


  • StatCounter

Become a Fan

Bluestem Tweets

    follow me on Twitter
    Blog powered by Typepad