On eve of Larry's revolution, judge grants motion to dismiss in Klayman vs. City Pages et al.

Larry Klayman may have more time foment his Second American Revolution after all.

According to an order posted on the case docket early this morning:

ORDER. 15 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim is granted to the extent provided in this Order. 14 Amended complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Second amended complaint is due 12/5/13. Signed by Chief Judge Anne C. Conway on 11/15/2013. (LAK) (Entered: 11/15/2013)

The Motion to Dismiss can be read here.

Since it's dismissed without prejudice, the conservative lawyer can come back at them, if he has time to address the problems spelled out by Judge Conway. Flogging a new Declaration of Independence may demand a lot of energy if it takes off, so who knows.

Here's the ruling:

Klayman v. City Pages et al

The City Pages article that in part triggered the complaint can be read here.

Photo: Larry Klayman.

If you enjoyed reading this post, consider giving a donation via mail (P.O. Box 108, Maynard MN 56260) or paypal:

Related articles

April Fools Day 2015 trial set for Klayman v. City Pages; Winston Churchill appointed mediator

Dean v. Maddow defamation lawsuit (sans Andy Birkey) finds its way to DC Court of Appeals

Defendants in Klayman v. City Pages et al. file motion to dismiss amended complaint

Document: City Pages et al file motion to dismiss Larry Klayman's $1.4 million defamation lawsuit

Bradlee Dean featured speaker at Larry Klayman's uprising to remove Obama from office

Comments

[plus.google.com/101411224429806729860]

Who could ever have guessed that superlawyer Larry Klayman, former scourge of the Clinton and Bush White Houses (credit where it’s due, he sued the f&*&ck out of George W. Bush for Dick Cheney’s energy task force meetings, where even the members of the task force were kept secret), and who most recently has been trying to get ol Prezzy to come out with his hands up, would have a lawsuit dismissed because he is bad at his job?
Oh, right, everyone could have guessed that! Because of how we have been watching him lose case after case, forever! First he lost Bradlee Dean’s suit against Rachel Maddow, then he called the judge in the Maddow case a “woman scorned,” then he lost his own child custody or alimony case (we forget), then he called the judge in that case a Jew! It is weird how everyone is always out to get Larry Klayman, with their Jewishness and scorned womanness. And now he has lost another! It is like he cannot even wildly sue people for defamation for no reason without losing! Poor Larry Klayman.

[Phoenix Woman]

Would one of the things he has to fix be the spelling of the name of at least one of the defendants? ;-)