« Minnesota House Ag Policy Committee to hear bipartisan bill on safe-for-pollinators plants | Main | MN7: Forum says ignore attack ads in contest »

Mar 17, 2014

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Tom Harris

Editor's Note: Perhaps because it's a well documented post.

Nor are the links cherry-picking information about this Heartland Institute darling's funding and misinformation.

See: http://www.skepticalscience.com/tom-harris-carleton-university-climate-misinformation-class.html

But other than that, everybody should totally believe everything Harris says.

Tom Harris's comment:
And why would you take anything DeSmog Blog takes without checking with their targets (namely us) to see if anything they say is true?

TomHarrisICSC

Editor's note: This is the sort of sarcastic answer we expect from a denier who wants to make this personal, rather than about the documented posts we're citing or the Dark Money sources of his funding.

Original comment:
Yes, this is the sort of sarcastic answer I would expect from alarmists alarmed that nature is not doing what they forecast.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Payment options

My Other Accounts

Delicious Digg Facebook Flickr FriendFeed Google Plus Other... Twitter Twitter YouTube

Important Information

  • All of the statements, opinions, and views expressed on this site by Sally Jo Sorensen are solely her own, save when she attributes them to other sources.

    The opinions, statements, and views of contributing writers are their own.

    Sorensen, editor and proprietor of Bluestem Prairie, serves clients in the business and nonprofit sectors. While progressive in outlook, she does not caucus with any political party.

StatCounter

  • StatCounter

Become a Fan

Bluestem Tweets

    follow me on Twitter
    Blog powered by Typepad