« Frac sand digest: petitions, planning and a silica sand trans-loading station for North Branch | Main | LSP polling reveals majority of Minnesotans queried oppose expansion of frac sand mining »

Apr 21, 2014

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Pete

I favor full legalization at the federal and state level. The DFL itself, not just Representative Melin, need to be "honest brokers" about this very complex issue. The legality of state medical marijuana itself is suspect. We need to address the core problem: the legal status of marijuana at the federal level. Cannabis substances are schedule I under the Controlled Substances Act. This is federal law. Federal law supersedes conflicting state law. The DFL is proposing law that conflicts federal law.

GONZALES v. RAICH, The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2004/2004_03_1454/ (last visited May 12, 2014).

The comments to this entry are closed.

Payment options

My Other Accounts

Delicious Digg Facebook Flickr FriendFeed Google Plus Other... Twitter Twitter YouTube

Important Information

  • All of the statements, opinions, and views expressed on this site by Sally Jo Sorensen are solely her own, save when she attributes them to other sources.

    The opinions, statements, and views of contributing writers are their own.

    Sorensen, editor and proprietor of Bluestem Prairie, serves clients in the business and nonprofit sectors. While progressive in outlook, she does not caucus with any political party.

StatCounter

  • StatCounter

Become a Fan

Bluestem Tweets

    follow me on Twitter
    Blog powered by Typepad