Latest ruling in wingnut Larry Klayman's #defamation suit w/ @citypages @phoenixnewtimes @avidor. http://t.co/heSwL8dK6s #stribpol #maricopa
— AnitaMaria (@Anita_Maria_S) October 24, 2014
Twin Cities tweepster Anita Maria expressed a distinct opinion about conservative activist attorney Larry Klayman, who is suing the City Pages and several others for reporting on a case in Ohio. Two of the filings and the judge's ruling are embedded below.
Bluestem has been following the case in such posts as Document: City Pages et al file motion to dismiss Larry Klayman's $1.4 million defamation lawsuit, Defendants in Klayman v. City Pages et al. file motion to dismiss amended complaint,On eve of Larry's revolution, judge grants motion to dismiss in Klayman vs. City Pages et al. and Klayman persists against City Pages et al since Blotter post helped Wonkette say mean things.
Media critic Jim Romenesko discussed the case in Letter: Ken Avidor on being silenced by a defamation suit.
The defendants ask that a"Summary judgment should be entered in favor of Defendants on all
counts because he is libel-proof":
Defendants' Motion for a Summary Judgement
Klayman asks for more discovery:
Klayman request for more discovery
The judge's ruling:
Klayman's request for more discovery
Photo: Larry Klayman at a rally.
If you appreciate Bluestem Prairie, you can mail contributions (payable to Sally Jo Sorensen P.O. Box 108, Maynard MN 56260) or use the paypal button below:
Email subscribers can contribute via this link to paypal; use email sally.jo.sorensen at gmail.com as recipient.
Comments