Watching the Minnesota House Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy Committee on Thursday afternoon, we were deeply impressed by vice chair Ami Wazlawik, DFL-White Bear Township, present three bills to ban the manufacturing, distribution and sale of products in cosmetics, cookware and ski wax that contain PFAs.
One of our tweets was quoted by committee member Sydney Jordan, DFL-Minneapolis, who flipped our comment to praise Wazlawik:
In the People's House, we are here to do the People's work. Thank you @amiwazlawik for your leadership to ban PFAS in cookware, cosmetics, and ski wax! https://t.co/a2AIhcPjAP
— Sydney Jordan (@SydneyJordanMN) February 10, 2022
UPDATE 2/11: At the Minnesota Reformer, Ricardo Lopez has another take in DFL bills would ban PFAS in cookware, cosmetics and ski wax. [end update]
UPDATE #2 2/13: At MPR, Kirsti Marohn reports in Bills would ban ‘forever chemicals’ from cosmetics, cookware, ski wax:
After the Minnesota Legislature passed a ban on so-called “forever chemicals” in food packaging last year, a DFL lawmaker wants to extend the ban on PFAS to more consumer products — cosmetics, cookware and ski wax.
The bills, authored by Rep. Ami Wazlawik of White Bear Township, Minn., cleared their first hurdle in the state House last week. . . .
Heintzeman said many Republicans are concerned about PFAS and believe they are a “dangerous problem,” but feel they should be addressed at the federal level.
“Having a patchwork of law all over the United States – every state passing their list of products that fall into a category that they find to be objectionable or not – seems to be a recipe for disaster,” he said.
Wazlawik said the federal government has been slow to take action on PFAS, and she doesn’t believe Minnesota should wait. She noted that Maine recently passed a broad ban on non-essential uses of PFAS in products. . . .
Lots more at MPR.[end update #2]
At Session Daily, Brian Hall reports more in Bills banning use of PFAS approved by House environment committee:
While some lawmakers would like to prohibit the use of dangerous, long-lasting chemicals known as PFAS across the board, the House Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy Committee took the first step in outlawing the use of the chemicals common in cosmetics, cookware and ski wax.
Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances have been linked to a range of adverse health effects, according to the United States Environmental Protection Agency. The man-made chemicals have been found in groundwater and surface water in Minnesota, according to the Department of Health.
Rep. Ami Wazlawik (DFL-White Bear Township) sponsors three bills to ban the manufacturing, distribution and sale of products in cosmetics, cookware and ski wax that contain PFAS, beginning Jan. 1, 2024. All were approved Thursday and referred to the House Commerce Finance and Policy Committee.
HF2906 was approved 13-3. HF2907 and HF2952 were approved 12-4. There are no companion bills in the Senate.
Wazlawik said Maine is the first state to ban all non-essential uses of PFAS in products by 2030.
“That was actually an approach that I preferred to take in our state, but I knew we didn’t have the support in the Republican-controlled Senate to actually get that done, despite the fact that we know these chemicals are harmful and that they are in our environment and they’re expensive to clean up,” Wazlawik said. “We tried to take this approach to sort of tackle some of the low-hanging fruit knowing that we didn’t have the support in the other body to be able to pass a more comprehensive bill, which I would have preferred.”
Rep. Josh Heintzeman (R-Nisswa) disagreed with the assertion that Republicans are the obstacle to banning PFAS. Heintzeman agreed that the chemicals are a concern and that laws should maybe be approached at a federal level.
“It’s not that there’s any opposition necessarily to trying to work on this issue because we all recognize that PFAS is a dangerous problem,” Heintzeman said. “These chemicals, no question, need to be more closely looked at.”
Heintzeman later added: “I think this is something we could work on in a bipartisan way. This approach as referred in testimony today, targeting retailers as the enemy and potentially levying fines of over $10,000 if you cumulatively have many days of violations, that doesn’t seem to be the answer in my opinion.”
Civil penalties could reach $10,000 per day of violation, according to the nonpartisan House Research Department. Defendants could also be required to compensate the state for the value of cleanup, loss or destruction of wildlife and other damages.
Tony Kwilas, director of environmental policy for the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce, said there are more than 4,000 chemicals that are considered PFAS and not all have adverse effects or need further study. He said there are more than 6,000 current uses of PFAS.
“I don’t believe the science is out there yet,” said Rep. Tama Theis (R-St. Cloud). “I don’t believe that we’ve got the data that absolutely says we’re on the right path with the bill.”
Theis drew an analogy between the science of PFAS and vaccine-created damages and sounded rather silly.
The Session Daily article doesn't include the testimony of those in favor of the bills. All three bills passed with bipartisan support.
Here's the House Information Services YouTube of the committee hearing:
We'll miss seeing Wazlawik in action, particularly on PFAS issues. In September, Rilyn Eischens reported for the Minnesota Reformer in DFL Rep. Ami Wazlawik won’t seek reelection in 2022:
Wazlawik served as vice chair of the Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy Committee during the 2021 session. She authored legislation to restrict uses of a carcinogenic chemical called trichloroethylene in 2020 after the state found that Water Gremlin, a manufacturer in her district, had released dangerous levels of the chemical in violation of state law for years.
Wazlawik also introduced a bill to ban the use of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances — also known as PFAS — in food packaging, which was signed into law. . . .
Photo: Rep. Ami Wazlawik, DFL-White Bear Township. Photo: Minnesota House.
If you appreciate Bluestem Prairie, you can mail contributions (payable to Sally Jo Sorensen, 600 Maple Street, Summit SD 57266) or use the paypal button in the upper right hand corner of this post.
Or you can contribute via this link to paypal; use email [email protected] as recipient.
I'm on Venmo for those who prefer to use this service: @Sally-Sorensen-6
Comments