« Party On! South Dakota Republican elected leaders think Pandora Papers totally bogus | Main | MN House Ag committee hears Ecklund bill requiring more CWD safeguards in farmed deer »

Feb 13, 2022

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Donald Pay

I was a lobbyist for the Sierra Club in South Dakota in the 1990s. We saw ethanol as a bridge fuel that could help to stabilize the agricultural base of the Midwest after the devastation of Farm crisis and Reagan years. The Midwest Chapters of the Sierra Club bucked the national office and joined with the Corn Growers to, if not support, at least not oppose the industry. We knew the environmental downsides of corn-based ethanol, but thought the upside of creating a bridge to cellulosic ethanol was worth temporary downsides. Well, that didn't happen. Today, the downsides vastly outweigh the upsides. The question is how best to reduce the ethanol industry without dire consequences to the communities who benefit from it. It's going to be a challenge.

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Other Accounts

Important Information

  • All of the statements, opinions, and views expressed on this site by Sally Jo Sorensen are solely her own, save when she attributes them to other sources.

    The opinions, statements, and views of contributing writers are their own.

    Sorensen, editor and proprietor of Bluestem Prairie, serves clients in the business and nonprofit sectors. While progressive in outlook, she does not caucus with any political party.

StatCounter

  • StatCounter

Become a Fan

Bluestem Tweets

    follow me on Twitter
    Blog powered by Typepad