« Ethanol carbon pipeline digest: trust & protest | Main | MNReformer: Want court documents? It will cost you, and now lawmakers want to stop it »

Apr 11, 2022

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

JohnHei99991760

"MnDOT project manager Joeb Oyster told Becker County commissioners that there are areas along Highway 34 that have a lot fewer trees than the project area, so after the trees are removed “it will match very well with the rest of the scenic corridor.”"

So, MnDOT's Oyster says clearing wooded areas so they resemble areas without many trees will be a plus for the Scenic Corridor?

Terry

Applying Oyster’s logic, then MNDOT should clear cut every tree from the MN border east of the Red River across the entire state. That way the entire state will “match” because that’s how nature should work.

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Other Accounts

Important Information

  • All of the statements, opinions, and views expressed on this site by Sally Jo Sorensen are solely her own, save when she attributes them to other sources.

    The opinions, statements, and views of contributing writers are their own.

    Sorensen, editor and proprietor of Bluestem Prairie, serves clients in the business and nonprofit sectors. While progressive in outlook, she does not caucus with any political party.

StatCounter

  • StatCounter

Become a Fan

Bluestem Tweets

    follow me on Twitter
    Blog powered by Typepad