How popular are ethanol carbon pipelines in South Dakota? The answer to that question depends.
One day after the South Dakota Searchlight published Joshua Haiah's Regulators reject landowners’ attempt to stop carbon pipeline, there's more to the ongoing saga.
Perhaps not the same landowners, but they probably run in the same set.
Landowners congregate in Capitol to push for tighter restrictions on eminent domain
By Joshua HaiarLandowners and concerned citizens from around the state congregated Wednesday in the Capitol to advocate for protection from compulsory land acquisition, or eminent domain, and to support a bill limiting the practice.
They criticized three projects planned in the state — two carbon capture pipelines and a pumped storage project — all of which could require eminent domain.
One carbon capture project, the Summit Carbon pipeline, would cross Roy Meyer’s rural Aberdeen farmland. Meyer said the project should not be allowed to use eminent domain, because he said the project does not benefit the general public. The pipeline would capture carbon dioxide emitted from Midwest ethanol plants and transport it in liquefied form to be sequestered underground in North Dakota.
“Public use is supposed to be something that benefits the public,” Meyer said. “This is not going to benefit the public at all.”
Rep. Karla Lems, R-Canton, has introduced legislation that would limit eminent domain to projects that are “for the public use.”
“This House bill will hopefully tighten things up a bit,” Lems said.
The bill does not define “public use.” Lems said it’s a well-understood concept in South Dakota law. She added that the bill is a work in progress.
Lems wants recognition that carbon capture pipelines are not for the public use in the way that a railroad or natural gas pipeline benefits public users.
Watertown farmer and rancher Rich Shultz came to Pierre to support that message.
“We’d prefer to have our voices heard by sending our representatives to carry our message, but here we are, making sure that message gets out there,” Shultz said.
Meanwhile, Summit Carbon Solutions has 10 registered lobbyists for 2023.
Minnehaha County farmer Joy Hohn said she’s concerned about the potential for rupture along the pipelines.
“The carbon pipelines are very hazardous and potentially lethal for farmers,” Hohn said. “We don’t want a rupture. We don’t want to endanger citizens and our families.”
But Summit Carbon Solutions says it has the backing of many South Dakotans.
The company has more than 450 easement agreements with South Dakota landowners, accounting for 56% of the proposed pipeline route through the state, with many additional landowners currently considering agreements, according to Courtney Ryan, a Summit Carbon Solutions spokesperson.
“This support tells us South Dakota landowners along the route view the project as critical to supporting the state’s most important industry — agriculture,” Ryan said in an emailed statement. “Given this strong and growing support across the state, it’s not surprising project opponents continue to try to invent distractions in their attempts to prevent essential investments in the state’s infrastructure, even those that will create jobs and grow our economy.”
Meanwhile, Summit Carbon Solutions has filed lawsuits seeking access to some land where landowners have refused to grant permission for survey work.
Another bill addressing eminent domain this legislative session would strengthen notice requirements for landowners when companies want to access and survey land, and require a $500 payment for that access, among other amendments to existing law.
This article is republished online under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
Photo: Jennifer Poindexter, left, speaks with Rep. Rocky Blare, center, as Bruce Burkhart looks on during a gathering Jan. 18, 2023, at the Capitol where landowners and others advocated for tighter restrictions on eminent domain. (Joshua Haiar/SD Searchlight).
Related posts
- Landowners & concerned local folks invited to Carbon Pipelines 101 meeting Jan. 23, Lamberton
- News digest: South Dakota and Minnesota PUCs deal with Summit carbon pipeline issues
- In Iowa, ethanol carbon pipeline opponents want pause until new safety regulations are ready
- Summit Carbon Solutions files permit for risky CO2 pipeline in Otter Tail and Wilkin Counties
- Will ethanol carbon capture pipelines fracture brittle unity of South Dakota Republicans?
- South Dakotans & others get fantods over Summit Carbon Solutions' sketchy 10% owner
- Matt Birk loves the ethanol carbon dioxide pipeline proposed by Summit Carbon Solutions
- Ethanol carbon pipeline news digest: from the Guardian to the Aberdeen American News
- Navigator CO2, POET sign letter of intent for carbon capture, utilization, and storage service
- Carbon capture pipeline blues: SD landowners call for dismissal of pipeline permit application
- Iowa Capital Dispatch: Group seeks end of ethanol carbon pipeline ‘harassment’
- Ethanol carbon capture pipeline digest: farmers, students, greenwashing, safety, law enforcement
- Storm Lake Time Pilot's Art Cullen: Ripping up CRP is a terrible signal for the planet
- Minnesota Public Utility Commission claims regulatory authority for carbon pipelines
- CO2 pipelines could affect the land, lives and livelihoods of South Dakota property owners
- SD News Watch: Proposed CO2 pipelines thrust SD into billion-dollar climate change debate
- About that permanent carbon storage by the Summit ethanol pipeline & Project Tundra
- Ethanol carbon capture pipeline news digest: political power and big money edition
- Ethanol carbon pipeline digest: trust & protest
- South Dakotans, Iowans don't hug CO2 pipeline
- Keloland: mostly negative public comments to SD Public Utilities Commission on CO2 pipeline
- Strib: Ethanol's per-gallon carbon output shrinks, but greenhouse gas from plants remains high
- We agree: It's time to move on from ethanol
- Another IA newspaper editorial board questions ethanol industry, carbon capture pipelines
- Ethanol CCS pipeline update: Reuters & Agweek
- Not a lot of easements for Midwest carbon pipeline, but plenty of political connections
- 2 ethanol CO2 headlines that make us go hmmm
- CO2 pipelines: who wins & who loses?
- Coming soon from a cornfield near you: mammoth carbon capture pipeline system
- Mother Jones: USDA Secretary Vilsack’s son works for a controversial ethanol pipeline project
- Iowa county boards scorn construction of CO2 pipelines, use of eminent domain to build them
- Digest of news about carbon dioxide pipeline
If you appreciate Bluestem Prairie, you can mail contributions (payable to Sally Jo Sorensen, 600 Maple Street, Summit SD 57266) or use the paypal button in the upper right hand corner of this post.
Or you can contribute via this link to paypal; use email [email protected] as recipient.
I'm on Venmo for those who prefer to use this service: @Sally-Sorensen-6
Comments