Another interesting article from South Dakota Searchlight. Bluestem recommends reading it paired with a recent post from Dakota Free Press, Noem Says She Supports Landowners But Can’t Help, Blames Legislature and China for CO2 Pipeliners’ Invasion.
Who says South Dakota's governor can't have an issue every way she wants it, for whatever political hobby horse she may be riding? Is there a fundraising opportunity for switching horses in the middle of a rhetorical stream?
Noem is investor in ethanol plant partnered with carbon pipeline company
by Joshua Haiar and Seth TupperGov. Kristi Noem is an investor in an ethanol plant that’s partnered with a company proposing a controversial carbon dioxide pipeline.
The ethanol plant is Granite Falls Energy in Granite Falls, Minnesota. Noem’s financial disclosures from her former service in Congress and her current time as governor reveal that she and her husband are investors in the plant. Summit Carbon Solutions, a company proposing a carbon pipeline through South Dakota, lists Granite Falls Energy as one of its partners.
Noem’s congressional disclosure forms, which require only an estimated range of income rather than an exact amount, say she made between $25,006 and $70,000 in dividends from the plant between her first run for Congress in 2010 until the end of her service as a U.S. representative in early 2019. The state-level disclosures she’s filed since then only require the identification of income sources, not amounts.
The disclosures raise questions about Noem’s lack of support for anti-pipeline legislation, according to Ed Fischbach, an Aberdeen-area farmer whose land is near the pipeline route.
“She and the people in her office wouldn’t even come talk to us when we came to the Capitol,” Fischbach said.
Noem’s spokesman, Ian Fury, responded to a message from South Dakota Searchlight with a written statement saying Noem “invested in Granite Falls many years ago and has always appropriately disclosed her finances.”
“Governor Noem has always supported our ethanol industry,” Fury’s statement said. “Like many farmers and those who have made a living in agriculture, she puts her money where her mouth is.”
Ethanol is a fuel additive made primarily from corn. Summit’s multi-billion-dollar project would capture carbon dioxide emissions from 34 ethanol plants in the upper Midwest. The gas would be liquefied and transported by pipeline for underground sequestration in North Dakota.
The pipeline project would qualify for incentive payments from the federal government of $85 per metric ton of carbon sequestered, for removing heat-trapping carbon from the atmosphere. It could also allow participating ethanol producers to sell their products in states and countries with stricter emissions standards.
A similar project, the Heartland Greenway pipeline, would also pass through South Dakota on its way to a sequestration site in Illinois. That project is proposed by a company called Navigator CO2.
Noem’s actions, positions
Noem has been involved in carbon pipeline policymaking. In March 2022, she signed a bill that established taxes for carbon dioxide pipelines similar to oil and natural gas pipelines. Summit Carbon Solutions testified in favor of the bill. At that time, Granite Falls Energy was already a partner with Summit, according to multiple media reports.
About a month after Noem signed that bill into law, Granite Falls CEO Jeffrey Oestmann said the proposed pipeline is vital to the company’s survival.
“We can’t compete without it,” he said during a landowner meeting in Sacred Heart, Minnesota, according to the Alexandria Echo Press newspaper.
No bills addressing carbon pipelines reached Noem’s desk during the most recent legislative session last winter. The permitting process for the pipelines is being handled by the state Public Utilities Commission, whose members are independently elected and unconnected with the Governor’s Office. The PUC’s public permit hearings for Summit and Navigator are scheduled for later this summer.
Noem has talked publicly about the pipeline proposals lately, after taking criticism from landowners along the pipeline routes. Some say Noem is not doing enough to protect their property rights from eminent domain, which is a court process that Summit is using to obtain access to land from unwilling landowners (meanwhile, Summit says about 70% of affected South Dakota landowners have signed voluntary easements).
In a radio interview published earlier this week by KWAT in Watertown, Noem responded to that criticism by saying, “I’m with the landowners and always have been.”
She then referenced recent reports that Summit has been using heavy equipment to conduct surveys that damaged some farmland.
“I’m shocked at some of those images and things that I’m seeing that’s happening to these farmers and landowners,” Noem said.
Her comments caused a backlash among some affected landowners and their allies. They have accused her of failing to support a bill last winter that would have prohibited carbon pipeline companies from using eminent domain. The bill passed the state House but failed in a Senate committee.
Fischbach, the Aberdeen-area farmer, said Noem not only failed to support the legislation but actively worked against it.
“Shoot, she had people in her office lobbying against the bill,” he said.
Fury, Noem’s spokesman, told South Dakota Searchlight that Noem “is particularly concerned about Summit’s use of eminent domain. She is also concerned about Summit’s financial ties to Chinese-influenced businesses.”
In her interview with KWAT, Noem alleged that Summit is benefitting from hundreds of millions of dollars in investments from China. Summit has denied that allegation in a subsequent statement to Sioux Falls-based television station KELO, but KELO pointed out that Summit secured a $300 million investment from TPG Rise Climate, and TPG Rise Climate has mentioned the Chinese Silk Road Fund as one of its investors.
Watchdog group criticizes Noem
On Thursday, a Washington, D.C.-based group called Accountable.US contacted South Dakota Searchlight with a tip and information revealing Noem’s investment in Granite Falls Energy. The website InfluenceWatch describes Accountable.US as an advocacy group on the center-left portion of the ideological spectrum.
“Gov. Noem stands to gain personally from this pipeline deal that robs a growing number of farmers of their land,” said Chris Marshall, spokesperson for Accountable.US, in a written statement. “If Noem is more committed to protecting her out-of-state investments, she should be upfront about her conflict of interest. If the governor really stands with farmers, action speaks louder than begrudging words of support.”
South Dakota Searchlight independently confirmed the information about Noem’s investment in Granite Falls Energy. Searchlight also found that while Noem was in Congress, she disclosed an investment in another ethanol plant, Glacial Lakes Energy in Watertown, which is also a Summit partner. She disclosed between $603 and $3,000 in income from that plant between her first run for Congress in 2010 until the end of her service as a U.S. representative in early 2019.
During her time as governor, Noem’s financial disclosures have not listed an investment in Glacial Lakes Energy. Noem’s spokesman, Ian Fury, told South Dakota Searchlight she is no longer invested in the Glacial Lakes plant. Not all of Noem’s state-level financial disclosures are readily available, because some of the links to the documents on the South Dakota Secretary of State’s website are broken.
But Noem has other connections to Summit Carbon Solutions. The company was one of five platinum sponsors for Noem’s second inauguration in January, along with ethanol company POET. The South Dakota Ethanol Producers Association was a gold-level sponsor.
And Noem’s son-in-law, Kyle Peters, is a registered lobbyist for Gevo Inc., which is building a plant to make jet fuel from corn in Lake Preston and plans to partner with Summit Carbon Solutions. Noem lauded Gevo’s project during her State of the State address to lawmakers in January.
“Gevo’s Net-Zero 1 Site in Lake Preston is the first ever billion-dollar investment in South Dakota,” she said. “They will literally turn corn into jet fuel, as impossible as that sounds.”
Some members of Noem’s own Republican Party are calling for a special legislative session – which can be called by the governor or two-thirds of the Legislature – to protect landowners along the pipeline route from eminent domain. Those Republicans, organized as the South Dakota Freedom Caucus, say they will stage a rally at noon Central on Thursday in the state Capitol Rotunda.
“The governor claims to be looking for a way to help the landowners,” said South Dakota Freedom Caucus Chairman and state Rep. Aaron Aylward, R-Harrisburg, in a news release. “Convening a special session would immediately address this crisis.”
View Noem’s 2019, 2022-2023 state-level disclosures and Noem’s 2010-2019 congressional disclosures at the end of Noem is investor in ethanol plant partnered with carbon pipeline company at South Dakota Searchlight.
This article is republished online under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
Photo: The Granite Falls Energy ethanol plant is shown in this file photo.Tom Cherveny / West Central Tribune file photo, via our post, Coming soon from a cornfield near you: mammoth carbon capture pipeline system.
Related posts
- Commentary: Governor Noem’s actions speak louder than words on eminent domain
- New Midwest battles brew over CO2 pipelines
- South Dakota Searchlight: Environmental groups seek Biden moratorium on ethanol CO2 pipelines
- Iowa Capital Dispatch: Landowner battles against ethanol CO2 pipelines vary by state
- Ethanol CO2 pipeline news digest: PUC hearings in Minnesota; South Dakota lawsuits; IA setbacks
- CURE files appeal with MN PUC on Summit Carbon pipeline environmental review
- News digest: South Dakota and Minnesota PUCs deal with Summit carbon pipeline issues
- In Iowa, ethanol carbon pipeline opponents want pause until new safety regulations are ready
- Summit Carbon Solutions files permit for risky CO2 pipeline in Otter Tail and Wilkin Counties
- Will ethanol carbon capture pipelines fracture brittle unity of South Dakota Republicans?
- South Dakotans & others get fantods over Summit Carbon Solutions' sketchy 10% owner
- Matt Birk loves the ethanol carbon dioxide pipeline proposed by Summit Carbon Solutions
- Ethanol carbon pipeline news digest: from the Guardian to the Aberdeen American News
- Navigator CO2, POET sign letter of intent for carbon capture, utilization, and storage service
- Carbon capture pipeline blues: SD landowners call for dismissal of pipeline permit application
- Iowa Capital Dispatch: Group seeks end of ethanol carbon pipeline ‘harassment’
- Ethanol carbon capture pipeline digest: farmers, students, greenwashing, safety, law enforcement
- Storm Lake Time Pilot's Art Cullen: Ripping up CRP is a terrible signal for the planet
- Minnesota Public Utility Commission claims regulatory authority for carbon pipelines
- CO2 pipelines could affect the land, lives and livelihoods of South Dakota property owners
- SD News Watch: Proposed CO2 pipelines thrust SD into billion-dollar climate change debate
- About that permanent carbon storage by the Summit ethanol pipeline & Project Tundra
- Ethanol carbon capture pipeline news digest: political power and big money edition
- Ethanol carbon pipeline digest: trust & protest
- South Dakotans, Iowans don't hug CO2 pipeline
- Keloland: mostly negative public comments to SD Public Utilities Commission on CO2 pipeline
- Strib: Ethanol's per-gallon carbon output shrinks, but greenhouse gas from plants remains high
- We agree: It's time to move on from ethanol
- Another IA newspaper editorial board questions ethanol industry, carbon capture pipelines
- Ethanol CCS pipeline update: Reuters & Agweek
- Not a lot of easements for Midwest carbon pipeline, but plenty of political connections
- 2 ethanol CO2 headlines that make us go hmmm
- CO2 pipelines: who wins & who loses?
- Coming soon from a cornfield near you: mammoth carbon capture pipeline system
- Mother Jones: USDA Secretary Vilsack’s son works for a controversial ethanol pipeline project
- Iowa county boards scorn construction of CO2 pipelines, use of eminent domain to build them
- Digest of news about carbon dioxide pipeline
If you appreciate Bluestem Prairie, you can mail contributions (payable to Sally Jo Sorensen, 600 Maple Street, Summit SD 57266) or use the paypal button in the upper right hand corner of this post.
Or you can contribute via this link to paypal; use email [email protected] as recipient.
I'm on Venmo for those who prefer to use this service: @Sally-Sorensen-6
The disingenuousness of this governor is reprehensibly beyond reproach. More than anything, the hubris and superciliousness she displays indicate the absence of any semblance of concern for the constituents of South Dakota. She serves her corporate masters.
Posted by: Witch Tracy | Jul 01, 2023 at 11:03 AM