Yet another development in the tale of ethanol carbon pipeline proposals in the Upper Midwest. From the South Dakota Searchlight:
New property rights coalition plans to lobby for eminent domain restrictions
By Joshua HaiarSIOUX FALLS — A statewide coalition has formed to pursue restrictions on the use of eminent domain for projects such as carbon dioxide pipelines.
The group introduced itself during a press conference Thursday at the Denny Sanford Premier Center.
The politically diverse coalition, named South Dakotans First, consists of the South Dakota Farmers Union, Dakota Rural Action, Landowners for Eminent Domain Reform, and various landowners.
Farmers Union President Doug Sombke told South Dakota Searchlight the coalition will advocate for property rights generally. But its creation is a response to Summit Carbon Solutions’ filing of eminent domain proceedings against more than 150 landowners for a proposed multi-state carbon dioxide pipeline. Summit has said the eminent domain actions have since been withdrawn.
“Eminent domain” refers to the power to access private property for public use, provided the owner is given just compensation.
Summit’s project
Summit applied for a permit to construct a pipeline in February 2022. The South Dakota Public Utilities Commission denied the application last month, citing the route’s conflicts with ordinances in four counties that mandate minimum distances between pipelines and existing homes, businesses and other features.
Summit plans to reapply after identifying a new route that complies with the county ordinances. That’s why South Dakotans First sees the upcoming legislative session in Pierre, which begins in January, as a vital time to pass reform laws.
“Just because you put a permit application in, that doesn’t mean you get to trespass on peoples’ land,” Sombke said.
Sombke said the definition of “public use” will be stretched beyond its original intent if it allows companies like Summit to use eminent domain without delivering a commodity the general public uses – like water, gas or electricity.
Summit seeks to capture carbon dioxide emitted from 31 ethanol plants in multiple states and transport it in liquid form to an underground sequestration site in North Dakota. The multi-billion-dollar project is eligible for billions in tax credits from the federal government, as incentives for removing heat-trapping carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
Sombke said mitigating climate change is arguably a “public use,” but carbon is not a commodity when it’s being buried underground.
“If people want to do stuff about carbon in the atmosphere, they need to do it in a way that works with the landowners,” Sombke said. “The majority of people, people in the middle, they are with us on that.”
Last legislative session, proponents of the pipeline said some of the CO2 would be used to carbonate soft drinks and make products including dry ice, which are commodities the public uses.
Rep. Karla Lems, R-Canton – who owns land the pipeline would cross – was in attendance at Thursday’s press conference. She sponsored a failed bill last winter that would have barred eminent domain for carbon pipelines. This winter, she plans to support a bill that would ban pipelines from using eminent domain until they have a permit from the Public Utilities Commission. Lems and Sombke said a number of other bills are in the works but are not ready to be shared.
Sombke shared the results of an online survey the coalition funded – conducted by Embold Research. It surveyed 1,037 likely general election voters in the state from Sept. 5 to 10 and found that 85% of people familiar with eminent domain oppose its use for “private purposes.” Additionally, nearly 90% of voters surveyed don’t think Summit should be allowed to use eminent domain to complete the project.
Summit responds
The coalition is bracing for opposition. Proponents of the pipeline have said anti-eminent domain legislation would “change the rules in the middle of the game.”
Sabrina Zenor, a spokesperson for Summit, said in an emailed statement that nearly 75% of affected landowners have signed voluntary easement agreements giving access to the company.
“Our goal is 100% voluntary easement agreements, providing fair compensation and respectful land management,” she wrote. “This project is about opening new markets for South Dakota ethanol and corn farmers.”
Zenor referenced multiple court decisions that she said support Summit’s right to use eminent domain. She said a poll of 2,000 registered voters nationwide by the Renewable Fuels Association showed 50-55% of respondents support carbon pipeline projects, and roughly one in five voters express strong support.
Legislators look ahead
Rep. John Hansen, R-Dell Rapids, Rep. Chris Karr, R-Sioux Falls, and Rep. John Sjaarda, R-Valley Springs, attended the Thursday event.
Hansen said the upcoming legislative session is “shaping up to be less about Democrats versus Republicans, and really about who is going to stand up for the individuals that they represent, and who is going to just shill for corporations who come and fund their campaigns with donations.”
Senate President Pro Tempore Lee Schoenbeck, R-Watertown, did not attend Thursday’s event. He was part of the state Senate committee that unanimously rejected the bill that would have prevented carbon pipeline projects from using eminent domain. The bill had already passed the House of Representatives 40-28, but it was defeated 9-0 in the Senate Commerce and Energy Committee.
Schoenbeck said the people associated with South Dakotans First have “worn everybody out and they’re just going to have to wait until we get to Pierre” to see how Senate leadership reacts to their new efforts.
Doug Sombke said South Dakotans First also plans to support the people living near and opposed to the newly proposed state prison location south of Harrisburg.
This South Dakota Searchlight article is republished online under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
Photo: South Dakota Farmers Union President Doug Sombke discusses eminent domain concerns during a press conference Oct. 12, 2023, at the Denny Sanford Premier Center in Sioux Falls. The press conference was held to announce the launch of the South Dakotans First coalition. (Joshua Haiar/South Dakota Searchlight)
Related posts
- Navigator CO2 pulls its ethanol carbon pipeline permit application in Illinois
- Ethanol carbon pipeline news digest: Gevo aviation fuel needs Summit Carbon Solutions and more!
- Iowa Capital Dispatch: Summit pipeline hearing will resume on Tuesday; Navigator asks Iowa regulators to pause its pipeline permit request
- Iowa Capital Dispatch: Local officials in Iowa have potential to block carbon capture projects
- IA Capital Dispatch: Summit permit process in North Dakota has reached ‘uncharted waters
- North Dakota Public Service Commission votes 2-1 to reopen Summit Carbon pipeline case
- Navigator CO2 has not ‘taken any state off the map’ after SD pipeline permit rejection
- Ethanol carbon pipeline digest: reaction to denial; water use in IA; rich guy resists subpoena
- Iowa utility regulators want to finish Summit pipeline permit hearing by month’s end
- State denies Summit permit; both ethanol carbon pipelines proposed in South Dakota now rejected
- Summit Carbon Solutions forges ahead despite SD PUC staff's motion to deny pipeline permit
- SD PUC staff motion: non-mysterious portents in the air about potential denial of Summit Carbon Solution's pipeline permit application
- South Dakota Navigator pipeline decision might jeopardize Summit Carbon Solutions proposal
- Breaking: South Dakota Public Utilities Commission unanimously denies Navigator ethanol CO2 pipeline project permit
- Ethanol carbon pipeline news digest: permanent sequestration or enhanced oil extraction & more
- Iowa governor denies influence over Summit Carbon Solutions’ pipeline project process
- SD PUC Navigator CO2 Ventures update: Pipeline permit, overruling counties decision by Sept. 6
- Ethanol carbon pipeline update: Navigator asks SD PUC to shoot down county pipeline rules
- Ethanol carbon pipeline news digest: Iowa Utilities Board evidentiary hearing for Summit Carbon Solutions begins in Fort Dodge
- Ethanol carbon pipeline news digest: action picking up on Summit Carbon Solutions
- After North Dakota's pipeline permit application denial, Summit Carbon Solutions asks again
- Iowa administrative judge: Summit should reveal communities threatened by pipeline leaks
- South Dakota PUC expresses concerns as Navigator CO2 carbon pipeline hearing ends
- ND Public Service Commission denies Summit Carbon Solutions permit for ethanol carbon pipeline
- Ethanol carbon pipeline news digest, SD edition
- Thanks to federal tax credits, it’s boom time in the Midwest for carbon dioxide pipelines
- South Dakota Governor Noem is investor in ethanol plant partnered with carbon pipeline firm
- Commentary: Governor Noem’s actions speak louder than words on eminent domain
- New Midwest battles brew over CO2 pipelines
- South Dakota Searchlight: Environmental groups seek Biden moratorium on ethanol CO2 pipelines
- Iowa Capital Dispatch: Landowner battles against ethanol CO2 pipelines vary by state
- Ethanol CO2 pipeline news digest: PUC hearings in Minnesota; South Dakota lawsuits; IA setbacks
- CURE files appeal with MN PUC on Summit Carbon pipeline environmental review
- News digest: South Dakota and Minnesota PUCs deal with Summit carbon pipeline issues
- In Iowa, ethanol carbon pipeline opponents want pause until new safety regulations are ready
- Summit Carbon Solutions files permit for risky CO2 pipeline in Otter Tail and Wilkin Counties
- Will ethanol carbon capture pipelines fracture brittle unity of South Dakota Republicans?
- South Dakotans & others get fantods over Summit Carbon Solutions' sketchy 10% owner
- Matt Birk loves the ethanol carbon dioxide pipeline proposed by Summit Carbon Solutions
- Ethanol carbon pipeline news digest: from the Guardian to the Aberdeen American News
- Navigator CO2, POET sign letter of intent for carbon capture, utilization, and storage service
- Carbon capture pipeline blues: SD landowners call for dismissal of pipeline permit application
- Iowa Capital Dispatch: Group seeks end of ethanol carbon pipeline ‘harassment’
- Ethanol carbon capture pipeline digest: farmers, students, greenwashing, safety, law enforcement
- Storm Lake Time Pilot's Art Cullen: Ripping up CRP is a terrible signal for the planet
- Minnesota Public Utility Commission claims regulatory authority for carbon pipelines
- CO2 pipelines could affect the land, lives and livelihoods of South Dakota property owners
- SD News Watch: Proposed CO2 pipelines thrust SD into billion-dollar climate change debate
- About that permanent carbon storage by the Summit ethanol pipeline & Project Tundra
- Ethanol carbon capture pipeline news digest: political power and big money edition
- Ethanol carbon pipeline digest: trust & protest
- South Dakotans, Iowans don't hug CO2 pipeline
- Keloland: mostly negative public comments to SD Public Utilities Commission on CO2 pipeline
- Strib: Ethanol's per-gallon carbon output shrinks, but greenhouse gas from plants remains high
- We agree: It's time to move on from ethanol
- Another IA newspaper editorial board questions ethanol industry, carbon capture pipelines
- Ethanol CCS pipeline update: Reuters & Agweek
- Not a lot of easements for Midwest carbon pipeline, but plenty of political connections
- 2 ethanol CO2 headlines that make us go hmmm
- CO2 pipelines: who wins & who loses?
- Coming soon from a cornfield near you: mammoth carbon capture pipeline system
- Mother Jones: USDA Secretary Vilsack’s son works for a controversial ethanol pipeline project
- Iowa county boards scorn construction of CO2 pipelines, use of eminent domain to build them
- Digest of news about carbon dioxide pipeline
If you appreciate Bluestem Prairie, you can mail contributions (payable to Sally Jo Sorensen, 600 Maple Street, Summit SD 57266) or use the paypal button in the upper right hand corner of this post.
Or you can contribute via this link to paypal; use email [email protected] as recipient.
I'm on Venmo for those who prefer to use this service: @Sally-Sorensen-6
Comments