During Thursday's House Agriculture Finance and Policy Committee hearing on nitrates in drinking water and soil, South St. Paul DFL Representative Rick Hansen, who worked for the Minnesota Department of Agriculture before running for the legislature, delivered a pointed criticism of the process and called for change.
Here's video of his remarks. (full hearing video at the bottom of this post).
Hansen, whose Economic Interest Statement notes his income from farming and ownership of hundreds of acres of farmland in Fillmore and Freeborn County, as well as chairing the House Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy Committee, may be in the catbird's seat to address the ongoing crists.
There's more on the hearing at the Minnesota Reformer.
Madison McVan reported in EPA directive renews debate over state’s role in protecting drinking water from farm pollution:
For more than 30 years, Minnesota elected officials have directed time and public money into plans designed to address the growing issue of agricultural pollution in groundwater, largely with incentives for farmers to voluntarily adopt practices that reduce fertilizer runoff.
Rep. Rick Hansen, DFL-South St. Paul, was on a 1989 Nitrogen Fertilizer Task Force that outlined best management practices to reduce nitrate pollution.
Decades later, Hansen found himself in a committee hearing room, listening to the same proposals, even as the problem has worsened.
“The outcome has been more fertilizer use, more nitrates,” Hansen said Thursday. “Things have to change.”
The federal government agrees. Environmental Protection Agency officials informed state agencies in November that Minnesota hasn’t done enough to protect drinking water from nitrates — a toxic byproduct of fertilizers and livestock manure — in southeast Minnesota.
Drinking water with high levels of nitrate can cause methemoglobinemia or “blue baby syndrome,” a potentially life-threatening condition affecting the blood’s ability to carry oxygen throughout the body. Pregnant women and infants are particularly vulnerable to the effects of nitrates. Nitrates have also been linked to thyroid disease and certain cancers.
People who get drinking water from private wells are at high risk of consuming water with dangerous levels of nitrates because well owners are responsible for their own testing and treatment — unlike municipal water systems, which constantly monitor and address nitrate levels.
The House Agriculture and Finance Policy committee met Thursday afternoon to hear informational presentations by a University of Minnesota soil health expert and Minnesota Department of Agriculture staff, setting the stage for forthcoming debates over how to address the EPA’s mandate to take further action on nitrate pollution.
At least since the Legislature convened the Nitrogen Fertilizer Task Force in 1989, the state’s approach to nitrate pollution was to define and encourage “best management practices” for farms in various parts of the state, from the timing of fertilizer application to erosion control efforts and use of cover crops.
The Minnesota Groundwater Protection Rule, which took effect in 2019, took the best management practices approach one step further, adding a mechanism for the state to mandate adoption of certain practices in narrow cases — only if, after a period of several years, best management practices have been adopted on less than 80% of a drinking water supply area’s cropland, and the nitrate issue in the area is getting worse.
(The rule only covers the state-designated Drinking Water Supply Management Areas, which represent a small percentage of the state’s cropland, but the potential problem is vast: Minnesota farmers planted about 8.5 million acres of corn in 2021, according to the USDA, 15% of the state’s total surface area.)
The EPA letter focused on southeast Minnesota, which is dominated by karst terrain, meaning water — and the nutrients it collects — easily moves between the surface and underground aquifers.
But other areas of the state are also dealing with the downstream effects of fertilizer runoff.
Many farm industry groups oppose government regulation of fertilizer, and lawmakers including Rep. Steven Jacob, R-Altura, instead want to address the issue by creating additional incentives, like tax credits, for farmers to adopt best management practices (HF4044).
Minnesota already offers assistance to farmers wanting to implement best management practices, including grants and low-interest loan programs, though demand exceeds the funding for those programs, MDA staff said. The state also runs the Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program, which certifies producers who take measures to reduce nitrate pollution and prioritizes them in technical and financial assistance programs.
Hansen has seen enough carrots and wants more sticks: He’s proposing a 99-cent fee per ton of nitrogen sold to fund an assistance program for people whose private wells are polluted (HF4135). Under Hansen’s plan, that fee would increase if the amount of fertilizer sold in the state increases.
Minnesota Department of Agriculture Commissioner Thom Petersen was absent from Thursday’s hearing — he is on a trade mission to Cuba, MDA staff said.
Here's the Minnesota House Information Services YouTube of the entire hearing:
The Minnesota Reformer article is republished online under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
Screenshot: Representative Hansen, who is a member of the House Ag committee, speaking at the hearing.
Related posts
- The New Lede: Cancer in the corn belt sparks actions to fight farm chemical contamination
- In amicus brief, five ag groups ask to weigh in on ruling that blocked Daley dairy’s expansion plans
- Will MPCA's Clean Water Council recommend unconstitutional use of Legacy funds for mitigation of nitrate contamination of wells??
- State's southeastern Minnesota drinking water fix: grab donuts, coffee, and lobbyists, oh my
- Agency soup: MPCA, DNR, MDH & Ag release "Preventing fish kills in MN driftless region"
- Minnesota nitrate pollution update: raise fertilizer fees to help pay cost of nitrate pollution
- Land Stewardship Project applauds court’s support of Winona County; launches ‘Story Center Powerline’ initiative for rural residents
- Minnesota district court rules against Winona County dairy expansion; owner will appeal
- Agweek Special Report on Rural Health: 10% of MN private wells pose a health problem
- This is fine: update on MN state agencies' response to EPA letter on karst country nitrates
- Following emergency petition regarding nitrate contamination in SEMN karst region, EPA sees further action needed to protect public health
- On ‘Cancer Road,’ a group of southeastern MN families ask if nitrate exposure is to blame
- Eleven environmental groups petition EPA on nitrate pollution in Southeast Minnesota wate
- Strib scrutinizes MN Department of Ag action on nitrate-related Groundwater Protection Rule
- Nitrates in Southwestern Minnesota water: 'Do not give the water to infants' in Ellsworth
- Commentary from MinnPost: Can the state control nitrates in Minnesota waters?
- Minnesota Department of Health isn’t properly enforcing drinking water law, and kids will suffer
- is far from over
- Packed house at Newburg Township on using local control to protect community, karst
- All citizens are equal, but one thinks he's more equal: massive hog farm shareholder* seeks to prevent August 2 Newburgh Township meeting
- Jean Wagenius: For climate and clean water, state agencies need Walz to lead
If you appreciate Bluestem Prairie, you can mail contributions (payable to Sally Jo Sorensen, 600 Maple Street, Summit SD 57266) or use the paypal button in the upper right hand corner of this post.
Or you can contribute via this link to paypal; use email [email protected] as recipient.
I'm on Venmo for those who prefer to use this service: @Sally-Sorensen-6
Comments