On Tuesday, Bluestem republished the Session Daily article, Nitrate treatment represents bulk of spending proposed in ag finance, policy bill.
On Thursday, the Minnesota House Agriculture Finance and Policy Committee wrapped up its work for the session.
At Session Daily, Margaret Stevens reports in Committee OKs agriculture bill funding nitrate treatment, allowing fertilizer research council to sunset:
When session ended last year, House Agriculture Finance and Policy Committee Chair Rep. Samantha Vang (DFL-Brooklyn Center) had a goal: keep whole the Agricultural Growth, Research and Innovation program, which can develop both farmers and farm products.
In the interim, the Environmental Protection Agency directed the state to address nitrate contamination often connected to fertilizer use.
Managing both with a small supplemental budget target this year posed a challenge. However, Rep. Kristi Pursell (DFL-Northfield) appreciates the “out-of-the-box” thinking that went into HF3763, the committee’s supplemental budget bill.
Members approved the bill, as amended, on a split-voice vote Thursday and referred it to the House Ways and Means Committee.
It calls for almost $4.55 million in General Fund appropriations, with $3.1 million to treat nitrate contamination. Per an amendment adopted during the meeting, the money would be used for “home water treatment, including reverse osmosis, for private drinking-water wells with nitrate in excess of the maximum contaminant level,” in eight counties in southeastern Minnesota.
Other money would go to soil health equipment grants, biofuel equipment grants, and farm-to-school nutrition programs.
“It’s a small supplemental budget, but it will be impactful,” Vang said.
[MORE: View the spreadsheet]
Before the vote, Vang successfully amended the bill to remove two controversial items. As a result, interest will continue to build up the grain indemnity fund that was created last year, and school boards can allow waterfowl hatching programs.
Republicans, however, took issue with a remaining provision that would end funding for the Agricultural Fertilizer Research and Education Council. A 40-cent per ton fee on agricultural fertilizer raising about $1.3 million per year used to fund the council would instead go to a private well drinking water assistance program, beginning in the next biennium.
Rep. Paul Anderson (R-Starbuck) called the council a farmer-funded program that provides resources and education that can help reduce fertilizer use, adding it seems counterproductive to end the program when it could benefit water quality.
Rep. Rick Hansen (DFL-South St. Paul) said AFREC has always been about improving production, not water quality.
Here's the Minnesota Houe Information Services YouTube of the markup and discussion of the bill:
Related posts
- Nitrate treatment represents bulk of spending proposed in ag finance, policy bill
- [VIDEO] State vet briefs MN House Ag Committee on avian flu (HPAI) in dairy cows and people
- The New Lede: Cancer in the corn belt sparks actions to fight farm chemical contamination
- In amicus brief, five ag groups ask to weigh in on ruling that blocked Daley dairy’s expansion plans
- Will MPCA's Clean Water Council recommend unconstitutional use of Legacy funds for mitigation of nitrate contamination of wells??
- State's southeastern Minnesota drinking water fix: grab donuts, coffee, and lobbyists, oh my
- Agency soup: MPCA, DNR, MDH & Ag release "Preventing fish kills in MN driftless region"
- Minnesota nitrate pollution update: raise fertilizer fees to help pay cost of nitrate pollution
- Land Stewardship Project applauds court’s support of Winona County; launches ‘Story Center Powerline’ initiative for rural residents
- Minnesota district court rules against Winona County dairy expansion; owner will appeal
- Agweek Special Report on Rural Health: 10% of MN private wells pose a health problem
- This is fine: update on MN state agencies' response to EPA letter on karst country nitrates
- Following emergency petition regarding nitrate contamination in SEMN karst region, EPA sees further action needed to protect public health
- On ‘Cancer Road,’ a group of southeastern MN families ask if nitrate exposure is to blame
- Eleven environmental groups petition EPA on nitrate pollution in Southeast Minnesota wate
- Strib scrutinizes MN Department of Ag action on nitrate-related Groundwater Protection Rule
- Nitrates in Southwestern Minnesota water: 'Do not give the water to infants' in Ellsworth
- Commentary from MinnPost: Can the state control nitrates in Minnesota waters?
- Minnesota Department of Health isn’t properly enforcing drinking water law, and kids will suffer
- is far from over
- Packed house at Newburg Township on using local control to protect community, karst
- All citizens are equal, but one thinks he's more equal: massive hog farm shareholder* seeks to prevent August 2 Newburgh Township meeting
- Jean Wagenius: For climate and clean water, state agencies need Walz to lead
If you appreciate Bluestem Prairie, you can mail contributions (payable to Sally Jo Sorensen, 600 Maple Street, Summit SD 57266) or use the paypal button in the upper right hand corner of this post.
Or you can contribute via this link to paypal; use email [email protected] as recipient.
I'm on Venmo for those who prefer to use this service: @Sally-Sorensen-6
Comments