Nitrate treatment represents bulk of spending proposed in ag finance, policy bill

Bluestem's been following the discussion over excess nitrates in Minnesota's waters, so what I learned in watching the Minnesota House Agriculture Finance and Policy Committee walk through of its  finance and policy bill on Tuesday wasn't surprizing.

From Session Daily:

Nitrate treatment represents bulk of spending proposed in ag finance, policy bill
by Margaret Stevens

One of the first orders of business in the House Agriculture Finance and Policy Committee this year was an Environmental Protection Agency directive to address drinking water contamination caused by nitrogen fertilizer.

One of the committee’s final actions could be passage of a finance and policy bill with short-term solutions to help families get clean water.

Sponsored by Rep. Samantha Vang (DFL-Brooklyn Center), HF3763, as amended, calls for about $4.5 million in supplemental spending with most going for nitrate treatment.  

Spending and policy provisions covering pesticides, fertilizers, grain elevators and grant programs are included in the bill, which members walked through Tuesday. Amendments could be added Thursday before a committee vote.

The bill would appropriate $4.3 million from the General Fund to the Department of Agriculture, with $3.1 million going to address drinking water contaminated with nitrates. The department has proposed economic assistance for things such as reverse osmosis systems. Priority would be given to residences with pregnant people, small children or infants.

Other General Fund appropriations include:

• $300,000 for soil health equipment grants;
• $300,000 for beginning farmer assistance grants;
• $200,000 for the Agricultural Utilization Research Institute;
• $200,000 to expand Farm-to-School grants, allowing home-based daycare providers to participate; and
• $100,000 biofuels infrastructure grants.

[MORE: View the spreadsheet]

In future years, money for a private well drinking water assistance program operated by county health boards would come from a 40 cent per ton fertilizer fee, which currently funds the Agricultural Fertilizer Research and Education Council until June 30, 2025.

Rep. Paul Anderson (R-Starbuck) said it is almost ethically wrong to take those dollars and use them for a state purpose. 

Republicans also balked at a provision that would repurpose interest from the grain indemnity fund to fund farmer’s market equipment grants.

Other provisions in the bill would:

• prohibit hatching ducks or geese in public and charter schools unless it is a Future Farmers of America or 4-H waterfowl hatching program. Chicken hatching would still be allowed;
• make it easier for small elevators to abide by provisions in the grain indemnity fund by altering accounting practices;
• create processes for deregistering and emergency registration of fertilizers including input from a panel of experts;
• make pesticide applicator license exams available in Spanish;
• prohibit people younger than 18 from getting pesticide application licenses;
• modify elk damage claims reporting and set a limit of $1,800 per year for fence damage; and
• create a carbon credit market working group.

What’s in the bill?

The following are selected bills that have been incorporated in part or in whole into the agriculture finance and policy bill:  

• HF3763 (Vang)
• HF3809 (Tabke)
• HF3815 (Cha)
• HF3821 (Sencer-Mura)
• HF3823 (Hansen)
• HF4035 (Cha)
• HF4082 (Hansen)
• HF4110 (Hemmingsen-Jaeger)
• HF4163 (Norris)
• HF4164 (Rehm)
• HF4655 (Vang)
• HF4699 (Pursell)
• HF4989 (Pursell)
• HF5147 (Pursell)
• HF5229 (Vang)
• HF5231 (Vang)

In addition to the walk through, the committee heard testimony representatives from farm and ag interests, No formal action was taken, but on Thursday, the committee will consider amendments during mark up before the bill moves to Ways and Means Committee.

Here's the Minnesota House Information Services YouTube of the hearing:

Photo: Utica, Minnesota, a town in Minnesota's nitrate plagued karst region in Southeastern Minnesota. Source: Google.

Related posts

• [VIDEO] State vet briefs MN House Ag Committee on avian flu (HPAI) in dairy cows and people
• The New Lede: Cancer in the corn belt sparks actions to fight farm chemical contamination
• In amicus brief, five ag groups ask to weigh in on ruling that blocked Daley dairy’s expansion plans
• Will MPCA's Clean Water Council recommend unconstitutional use of Legacy funds for mitigation of nitrate contamination of wells??
• State's southeastern Minnesota drinking water fix: grab donuts, coffee, and lobbyists, oh my
• Agency soup: MPCA, DNR, MDH & Ag release "Preventing fish kills in MN driftless region"
• Minnesota nitrate pollution update: raise fertilizer fees to help pay cost of nitrate pollution
• Land Stewardship Project applauds court’s support of Winona County; launches ‘Story Center Powerline’ initiative for rural residents
• Minnesota district court rules against Winona County dairy expansion; owner will appeal
• Agweek Special Report on Rural Health: 10% of MN private wells pose a health problem 
• This is fine: update on MN state agencies' response to EPA letter on karst country nitrates
• Following emergency petition regarding nitrate contamination in SEMN karst region, EPA sees further action needed to protect public health
• On ‘Cancer Road,’ a group of southeastern MN families ask if nitrate exposure is to blame 
• Eleven environmental groups petition EPA on nitrate pollution in Southeast Minnesota wate
• Strib scrutinizes MN Department of Ag action on nitrate-related Groundwater Protection Rule
• Nitrates in Southwestern Minnesota water: 'Do not give the water to infants' in Ellsworth
• Commentary from MinnPost: Can the state control nitrates in Minnesota waters?
• Minnesota Department of Health isn’t properly enforcing drinking water law, and kids will suffer
• is far from over 
• Packed house at Newburg Township on using local control to protect community, karst 
• All citizens are equal, but one thinks he's more equal: massive hog farm shareholder* seeks to prevent August 2 Newburgh Township meeting
• Jean Wagenius: For climate and clean water, state agencies need Walz to lead

If you appreciate Bluestem Prairie, you can mail contributions (payable to Sally Jo Sorensen, 600 Maple Street, Summit SD 57266) or use the paypal button in the upper right hand corner of this post.

Or you can contribute via this link to paypal; use email [email protected] as recipient.

I'm on Venmo for those who prefer to use this service: @Sally-Sorensen-6