A glitch in YouTube livestreaming prevented me from watching the Minnesota House in an epic debate over a refresh of the 2023 law creating 20 weeks per year of paid time off to deal with family or medical issues.
I was able to semi-follow the debate on the X platform, where I read of the closing minutes of the bill on the floor.
In the early morning, KARE 11 political reporter John Croman posted video of the finish on the X platform:
Clip 2 of 2 pic.twitter.com/TL9LO50bsj
— John Croman (@JohnCroman) May 16, 2024
At Minnesota Public Radio, Dana Ferguson reported in Tensions flare at Minnesota Capitol as debates stretch on, Democrats try to force quicker votes:
Tensions ran high late Wednesday night as DFL Speaker Melissa Hortman called a snap vote on a bill making changes to a new paid family and medical leave program, an illustration of a possibly bumpy push to the legislative session’s finish this weekend.
Lawmakers have a May 20 deadline to adjourn and they can’t cast votes on Monday.
After nearly eight hours of debate on the paid-leave proposal, the DFLer from Brooklyn Park called a snap vote after lawmakers approved a motion to stay past midnight. Republicans shouted and called out various points of order during the vote. They said that they’d been silenced by the move to call the vote with no notice.
House Minority Leader Lisa Demuth said Thursday that she viewed the move to cut off debate as silencing the minority. . . .
At an event away from the Capitol, Gov. Tim Walz expressed optimism that deals could come together. He passed off the late-night flare-up as typical of this time of year.
“Not a lot of good happens after midnight. I would always encourage people, let’s finish before those times, get things done because tempers get a little short,” Walz said. . . .
At the Star Tribune, Briana Bierschbach reported in 'Everything is at risk': Tensions flare as Minn. lawmakers race to get work done by deadline:
As midnight on Thursday approached, Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman had heard enough.
The Brooklyn Park DFLer called for final votes on a bill making changes to the state's paid leave program after it had already been the subject of more than eight hours of debate, most of it criticism from Republicans. As she moved on to the next bill, Republicans shouted into their microphones, accusing her of silencing the minority party.
Likewise, Democrats have accused Republicans of spending hours filibustering multiple bills during the final week of the legislative session to try to obstruct the process and block their agenda. This is the latest flare-up between the two parties with days left until their deadline to adjourn and no agreement in sight to pass major legislation still outstanding, including an equal rights constitutional amendment, a package of construction projects and a bill to try to keep rideshare companies in the state. . . .
Tempers flared in the state Senate as well, where DFL Senate President Bobby Joe Champion said a Republican member threw a rules book at him during a marathon debate on bills that stretched from Wednesday into early Thursday morning. . . .
Read both articles at MPR and the Strib.
Session Daily's Tim Walker somewhat calmer report in House passes changes to paid leave law amid chaos at close of vote:
On the first day of 2026, a state-run insurance program is scheduled to begin providing Minnesota workers with up to 20 weeks per year of paid time off to deal with family or medical issues.
But one year after its passage, the Paid Family and Medical Leave Act may be getting refreshed.
Rep. Cedrick Frazier (DFL-New Hope) says HF5363, a bill he sponsors, will ensure the 2026 deadline is met and that the implementation will be smooth.
Republicans have a much different take, saying a smooth launch on the scheduled date is anything but certain for what they say is a fiscally unsound program whose cost is another hurt for small businesses.
The two sides laid out their respective positions during a nearly eight-hour discussion Wednesday.
Members eventually passed the amended bill via a chaotic 69-34 vote shortly before midnight and sent it to the Senate. The sudden vote occurred with some Republican members waiting to speak and a cacophony of shouts about process. At least one member could be heard making a motion to adjourn the legislative session sine die.
“It is not the responsibility of the minority to pass the majority party’s bills. It is the responsibility of the minority to make sure the voices of our constituents are represented. This silencing of minority voices is absolutely shameful. This is not a house of 70 members, it is a house of 134, and Democrats are disregarding that,” House Minority Leader Lisa Demuth (R-Cold Spring) said in a statement.
Frazier calls the 2023 law “a great safety net” to keep workers from choosing between staying on the job to collect a paycheck and caring for a loved one.
It establishes a family and medical insurance account modeled after the state’s unemployment insurance fund, including being funded from a 0.7% payroll tax on an employee’s wages, at least half of which must be paid by the employer.
The bill would boost the tax rate to 0.88%.
Frazier said the proposed change is based on an actuarial analysis earlier this year that calculated the 0.88% payroll premium rate would be needed to keep the program sufficiently funded to pay out future claims.
Additionally, the increase is justified, Frazier said, because paid leave benefits would begin during an employee’s first week of leave, which the original law would not have paid.
[MORE: View premium rate comparisons; view fiscal note]
Republican opposition, amendments
Republicans say the proposal indicates the program is already in trouble and proof the state cannot accurately determine the right amount of payroll tax to adequately fund the program.
Citing the state’s problems rolling out other technology platforms, Rep. Bernie Perryman (R-St. Augusta) questions if the Department of Employment and Economic Development can get the IT systems in place in time for a 2026 launch. She unsuccessfully offered an amendment to delay program implementation by 12 months.
Rep. Dave Baker (R-Willmar) is concerned the bill does not propose changes needed to make the law less burdensome for small-business owners.
He said small employers will struggle under the law, especially if they don’t have enough employees to cover the duties of those taking paid leave or to quickly hire new workers to assume work duties.
The bill does give small employers a break, Frazier said, noting the premium rate for employers having 30 or fewer employees would be 75% of the annual premium rate calculated each year for larger employers.
Baker unsuccessfully offered an amendment to exempt employers with fewer than 20 employees from being required to participate in the paid leave program or to offer a comparable private plan.
“The math doesn’t work,” said Rep. Kristin Robbins (R-Maple Grove). She argued that nearly all 12 states that have previously enacted similar paid leave programs have seen costs spiral out of control. “We are so underestimating the cost of this program.”
To that end, she unsuccessfully offered an amendment to limit the maximum length of paid benefits from 20 weeks to 12, except in the case of complications from a pregnancy which would warrant an extra two weeks.
Rep. Anne Neu Brindley (R-North Branch) successfully offered an amendment that would require any annual actuarial analyses and updates be sent to chairs and ranking minority members of the legislative committees with jurisdiction over paid leave legislation.
Photo: The Minnesota House floor in a non-riotous moment. House Photography file photo. via Session Daily.
If you appreciate Bluestem Prairie, you can mail contributions (payable to Sally Jo Sorensen, 600 Maple Street, Summit SD 57266) or use the paypal button in the upper right hand corner of this post.
Or you can contribute via this link to paypal; use email [email protected] as recipient.
I'm on Venmo for those who prefer to use this service: @Sally-Sorensen-6
Comments