Looks like we South Dakotans will indeed have a full ballot of referendums as well as candidates for office in November. And as noted in Sustainable jet fuel company Gevo contributes $167K in defense of carbon pipeline law, the passage of the referendum on the carbon pipeline law has its big business defenders.
From South Dakota Searchlight.
Referendum on carbon pipeline law validated for November election
By Makenzie HuberA seventh ballot question has been validated by the Secretary of State’s Office for the Nov. 5 general election. The referendum asks voters to consider a recently adopted state law concerning carbon dioxide pipeline restrictions and landowner rights.
Based on a random sample of signatures, the office estimated that 92% percent of the more than 34,000 signatures on the petition are from South Dakota registered voters, which means the estimated number of valid signatures is 31,432. The petition needed 17,508 to qualify for the election.
Opponents of the law want voters to reject Senate Bill 201, which the Legislature and Gov. Kristi Noem approved last winter. Supporters said the legislation will implement new protections for local governments and landowners while preserving a path forward for pipeline projects. Opponents view it as a capitulation to pipeline companies.
A 30-day window is now open for challenges to the validity of the petition.
The bill came in response to an $8.5 billion pipeline proposed by Summit Carbon Solutions, which is headquartered in Iowa. The pipeline would collect carbon dioxide from 57 ethanol plants in South Dakota and neighboring states and pipe it to North Dakota for underground storage. The project could benefit from federal tax credits that incentivize carbon sequestration to fight climate change.
The Iowa Utilities Board approved Summit’s project in June. The company announced shortly afterward that it plans to apply again for a permit in South Dakota this month, after the Public Utilities Commission denied its initial application last year. The company’s pipeline application in North Dakota is under consideration, and it still needs an underground storage permit in North Dakota.
The South Dakota denial was partly due to conflicts with county ordinances that require minimum distances known as “setbacks” between pipelines and other features. The project has also faced opposition from some landowners concerned about property rights and safety, including health risks associated with potential leaks.
The last referred law to appear on a South Dakota ballot was in 2016, after the state Legislature tried to exempt workers under age 18 from receiving a minimum wage increase (which had been approved by South Dakota voters in 2014). South Dakotans voted by a majority of 71.13% to reject the Legislature’s action.
Ballot question status update
Measures placed on the Nov. 5 ballot by the Legislature:
- An amendment to the state constitution updating references to certain officeholders and people (replacing male-specific pronouns with neutral language).
- An amendment to the state constitution authorizing the state to impose work requirements on certain people who are eligible for expanded Medicaid.
Citizen-proposed measures validated for the ballot:
- An initiated measure prohibiting state sales taxes on items sold for human consumption, specifically targeting state sales taxes on groceries.
- An initiated amendment to the state constitution re-establishing abortion rights.
- An initiated amendment to the state constitution establishing open primary elections.
- An initiated measure legalizing adult recreational use, possession and distribution of marijuana.
Referred law validated for the ballot:
- A referendum on a new law regulating carbon dioxide pipelines.
This South Dakota Searchlight article is republished under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
Photo: An anti-carbon pipeline sign is set up along the road near Canton. (Makenzie Huber/South Dakota Searchlight).
Related posts
- Sustainable jet fuel company Gevo contributes $167K in defense of carbon pipeline law
- South Dakota Property Rights and Local Control Alliance turns in petitions to SD Secretary of State to force a vote on carbon pipeline policy
- News digest: District 1, the edge of the primary election political earthquake in South Dakota
- South Dakota District 1 GOP House primary news round-up: carbon pipeline politics major issue
- New Midwest battles brew over CO2 pipelines
- Company behind proposed Lake Preston jet fuel plant buoyed by federal carbon credit ruling
- Ethanol carbon pipeline news digest: Gevo aviation fuel needs Summit Carbon Solutions and more!
- ND GOP resolution against CCS pipelines decries "false premise of looming climate apocalypse
- Summit Carbon Solutions says ethanol carbon pipeline system won’t be operational until 2026
- Some Iowa landowners were confused by Summit Carbon Solution eminent domain process
- Navigator CO2 pulls its ethanol carbon pipeline permit application in Illinois
- Ethanol carbon pipeline news digest: Gevo aviation fuel needs Summit Carbon Solutions and more!
If you appreciate Bluestem Prairie, you can mail contributions (payable to Sally Jo Sorensen, 600 Maple Street, Summit SD 57266) or use the paypal button in the upper right hand corner of this post.
Or you can contribute via this link to paypal; use email [email protected] as recipient.
I'm on Venmo for those who prefer to use this service: @Sally-Sorensen-6
Comments