Earlier Friday, Bluestem posted IA Rep. Miller-Meeks says carbon pipelines will help Iowa ethanol industry stay competitive, from the Iowa Capital Dispatch.
Later that day, more news about the proposed ethanol carbon pipelines broke at the Dispatch.
Summit jumpstarts pipeline efforts with purchase of old land easement agreements
By Jack O'ConnorSummit Carbon Solutions has purchased old land easement agreements from a former rival company to help speed up its carbon pipeline construction project, Summit officials confirm.
Summit’s former rival, Navigator CO2, attempted its own carbon dioxide pipeline project before backing out in October 2023. With Navigator out of the picture, Summit has purchased many of Navigator’s old agreements to expand its coverage area and save itself time by not needing to negotiate new agreements.
Summit received approval in June from the Iowa Utilities Board, now called Iowa Utilities Commission, on its pipeline project. With the permit approval, Summit was given the power of eminent domain to force unwilling landowners into easement agreements.
The proposed project plan would build pipelines in Iowa, Nebraska, Minnesota, South Dakota and North Dakota to carry captured carbon dioxide from ethanol plants and transport it to underground reservoirs in North Dakota.
Roadblocks for Summit remain
Iowa is the only state to give Summit the green light so far. Before Summit begins construction in Iowa, the organization still has a handful of roadblocks to overcome.
The Iowa Utilities Commission is requiring Summit to refile several documents to receive a permit. Summit is also still in the middle of lawsuits it filed against Iowa counties that have attempted to restrict the placement of pipelines.
Additionally, Summit still needs approval in South Dakota and North Dakota for pipelines to be placed in Iowa.
Summit will also be limited from engaging in any new easement agreements with landowners until the organization holds public informational meetings in affected counties as required by law.
Summit has released its schedule for 23 public informational meetings about the project across 23 different counties throughout August and September. The times and locations of the meetings can be read here.
The Iowa chapter of the Sierra Club, an environmentalist activist group, has pledged to fight against Summit’s pipeline efforts. The group is currently working with impacted landowners to oppose the project.
“The public comment period is our chance to tell the truth about carbon pipelines and the dangers they pose to our land, our families and our communities,” the Sierra Club wrote on its website. “We also need to make sure impacted landowners know they DO NOT have to sign an easement.”
Summit could also face challenges in the Legislature When Navigator wanted to connect pipelines from Iowa to Illinois, Illinois state lawmakers passed a two-year moratorium on new carbon dioxide pipelines.
In past sessions, the Iowa House of Representatives have passed three fairly bipartisan bills that would limit or regulate the use of eminent domain for these projects. However, none of the bills managed to pass the Iowa Senate.
Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds has expressed support for the benefits carbon dioxide capture could have on the Iowa agriculture industry as long as the benefits account for landowner rights.
On Thursday, after a tour of the Chevron Renewable Energy Group’s facility in Newton, Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks praised pipelines as a way to aid Iowa’s ethanol industry but avoided advocating for or against eminent domain by calling it a state issue, not a federal one.
“I would say that farmers and property owners need to look at the why, the rationale, and then determine if it’s in their best interest,” Miller-Meeks said. “Companies that are acquiring easements are looking at, ‘How do you make the land whole? How do you ensure farmers that you can grow crops in the near future, the timing, restructure so that land is put back in the position it was before they put in the pipeline?’”
Which agreements are being bought?
Summit isn’t purchasing every agreement made by Navigator, Summit spokesperson Sabrina Zenor said. The land easement agreements Navigator made for its proposed route did not always align with Summit’s route.
Some easement agreements in Iowa, Nebraska, Minnesota and North Dakota have already been purchased but Zenor said the number of easement agreements purchased and when Summit will finish buying the old Navigator agreements it wants can’t be confirmed yet.
Summit notified some landowners whose easement agreement was purchased via letters mailed to them.
“Summit has acquired right-of-way easement options previously held by Navigator CO2, including the option(s) you signed with Navigator CO2,” Lee Blank, Summit’s chief executive, wrote in a letter to landowners whose easement agreements Summit purchased. “These options provide us with right-of-way access along expansion routes to the POET and Valero ethanol plants that have recently been added to our project.”
With the Iowa Utilities Commission declining to reconsider its permit approval, another lawsuit involving the pipeline project from either landowners, environmental activists or Iowa counties is likely.
This Iowa Capital Dispatch article is republished online under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Photo: Opponents of Summit's pipeline project include landowners, county governments and environmental activists. (Photo by Joshua Haiar/South Dakota Searchlight).
Related posts
- IA Rep. Miller-Meeks says carbon pipelines will help Iowa ethanol industry stay competitive
- VIDEO: Carbon capture in Minnesota: public lands, fast money, and pipe dreams
- Summit pipeline segment enters final permitting stages in Minnesota; CURE raises objections
- Referred pipeline law puts Summit Carbon Solution's permit quest in limbo
- Carbon capture news from elsewhere: New Illinois law lays out safety requirements for future carbon sequestration projects
- Broad array of groups object to Summit pipeline permit approval by Iowa Utilities Commission
- Iowa ethanol carbon pipeline opponents poised for Summit Carbon Solutions permit challenges
- Breaking crowded South Dakota ballot news: carbon pipeline law referendum validated
- Sustainable jet fuel company Gevo contributes $167K in defense of carbon pipeline law
- South Dakota Property Rights and Local Control Alliance turns in petitions to SD Secretary of State to force a vote on carbon pipeline policy
- News digest: District 1, the edge of the primary election political earthquake in South Dakota
- South Dakota District 1 GOP House primary news round-up: carbon pipeline politics major issue
- New Midwest battles brew over CO2 pipelines
- Company behind proposed Lake Preston jet fuel plant buoyed by federal carbon credit ruling
- Ethanol carbon pipeline news digest: Gevo aviation fuel needs Summit Carbon Solutions and more!
- ND GOP resolution against CCS pipelines decries "false premise of looming climate apocalypse
- Summit Carbon Solutions says ethanol carbon pipeline system won’t be operational until 2026
- Some Iowa landowners were confused by Summit Carbon Solution eminent domain process
- Navigator CO2 pulls its ethanol carbon pipeline permit application in Illinois
- Ethanol carbon pipeline news digest: Gevo aviation fuel needs Summit Carbon Solutions and more!
If you appreciate Bluestem Prairie, you can mail contributions (payable to Sally Jo Sorensen, 600 Maple Street, Summit SD 57266) or use the paypal button in the upper right hand corner of this post.
Or you can contribute via this link to paypal; use email [email protected] as recipient.
I'm on Venmo for those who prefer to use this service: @Sally-Sorensen-6
Comments