The North Dakota Monitor article republished below mentions a statement from rural MN-based environmental group CURE.
I reprint the entire statement, then the Monitor article.
“Garbage In, Garbage Out”—CURE Calls Out the ‘Inadequacy’ of Minnesota’s Review of Summit CO2 Pipeline
Montevideo, MN, August 1, 2024 —Yesterday, the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (PUC) released for comment its Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the 28-mile Otter Tail to Wilkin Counties segment of Summit Carbon Solutions’ (Summit) proposed 240+ mile carbon dioxide (CO2) pipeline network in Minnesota.
This proposed project is part of Summit’s push for a $8.5 billion, 2,500 mile web of pipelines that would carry high-pressure CO2 from dozens of ethanol and other industrial facilities in Minnesota, Iowa, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota to sites in North Dakota where it can be injected into the earth to either extract oil or store it underground. Incentivized by the promise of billions of dollars in state and federal taxpayer-funded subsidies, Summit’s project has become a political flashpoint across the Midwest where landowners and communities in the footprint have raised concerns on a wide range of issues including safety and land-use impacts.
The Final EIS is an official document intended to provide decision-makers and the public about the social, environmental, and economic impacts and risks of the pipeline, and is a requirement under the Minnesota Environmental Policy Act (MEPA). While Summit is applying for a variety of permits in all five states and recently received approval for hundreds of miles of the pipeline in Iowa, Minnesota’s FEIS is the only in-depth review of its kind that the project is getting at either the state or federal level.
“It’s incredibly important that the PUC gets this right since this would be a first-of-its-kind project in the Midwest,” said Sarah Mooradian, CURE’s Government Relations and Policy Director. "Unfortunately, this Final EIS falls short. Hundreds of Minnesotans, Tribes, and organizations raised real and substantiated concerns about how this pipeline would affect water resources, agricultural land, and public safety—simply stating that these impacts will be ‘minimal’ as this Final EIS repeatedly does is not an adequate way to respond to those concerns.”
“The PUC started from the wrong place when they decided to only review the 28.5 miles of pipeline when Summit openly intends to build more than 240 miles in Minnesota—how can we really know the cumulative impact of this project on our air, land and water?” asked Peg Furshong, CURE’s CO2 Pipeline Organizer and a landowner in the footprint of Summit’s project. “The amount of water extraction is especially concerning with hundreds of miles of pipeline and dozens of facilities on the Minnesota and Iowa border—aquifers don’t respect state boundaries and we all rely on them.”
“In the Draft EIS released earlier this year it was clear that the agency staff who prepared it had no expertise assessing this kind of project, and had not hired contractors who did credible work,” said Hudson Kingston, Legal Director at CURE. “‘Garbage in garbage out’ is not an acceptable standard for an environmental review that will be the baseline for all future assessments of this kind of infrastructure in the state.”
The FEIS is open for public comment until September 11th, 2024 and the PUC will be holding public hearings in Fergus Falls (August 20 at 6pm CT, location TBC) and online (August 21 at 6pm CT).
On August 6th at 12pm CT, CURE will hold an informational briefing on the FEIS and the ongoing opportunities to engage. Register here: https://bit.ly/FEISbriefing
Additional info about CO2 pipelines: www.carbonpipelinesmn.org
The news article from North Dakota Monitor.
Summit pipeline segment enters final permitting stages in Minnesota
By Jeff BeachMinnesota sets hearings, finalizes environmental analysis
Minnesota agencies have released an environmental impact statement and set hearings on a small section of a huge project to capture carbon from ethanol plants in five states for underground storage in North Dakota.
The environmental impact report filed Wednesday by the Minnesota Department of Commerce says the Summit Carbon Solutions project would have a net benefit on greenhouse gas emissions.
“The CO2 sequestered from ongoing annual operations would outweigh construction and operation emissions. This benefit would vary depending on the capture rate and final end use of the captured CO2,” the report says.
One potential end use would be for enhanced oil recovery, using the carbon dioxide to get more oil production from wells in North Dakota.
The report says Summit has indicated it doesn’t intend to market the carbon dioxide for industrial use. Summit has stated the pipeline could be used for that purpose in the future.
Summit says the pipeline is needed to help ethanol plants lower their carbon intensity score and sell fuel for a premium price in low-carbon fuel markets. The pipeline would capture carbon from the Green Plains ethanol plant at Fergus Falls, Minnesota.
The study concludes by saying that the ethanol plant could also reduce its carbon score by lowering its energy use and using renewable energy and using corn grown using climate friendly practices.
While the EIS was compiled by the Department of Commerce, it is the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission that will make a decision on Summit’s permit application, likely by the end of the year, the report says.
The application is for about 28 miles of pipeline in Otter Tail and Wilkin counties in northwest Minnesota, starting at the Green Plains plant. It would cross into North Dakota south of Breckenridge.
It is part of an $8 billion project to capture carbon from 57 plants in five states with about 2,500 miles of pipeline. The underground storage area is planned to be northwest of Bismarck in western North Dakota.
The Minnesota PUC has public hearings planned for Aug. 20-21 and evidentiary hearings Aug. 22-23. A comment period is open through Sept. 11.
Sarah Mooradian is the government relations and policy director for CURE, a Minnesota environmental group that opposes the pipeline. She said the evidentiary hearings will include expert testimony from Summit and CURE and cross examination of those witnesses.
CURE released a statement Thursday on what it feels are shortcomings in the environmental report, which is similar to a previously released draft report.
“In the Draft EIS released earlier this year, it was clear that the agency staff who prepared it had no expertise assessing this kind of project, and had not hired contractors who did credible work,” said Hudson Kingston, legal director at CURE. “‘Garbage in garbage out’ is not an acceptable standard for an environmental review that will be the baseline for all future assessments of this kind of infrastructure in the state.”
Iowa-based Summit released this statement on the EIS:
“Summit Carbon Solutions respects the comprehensive review process undertaken in the final Environmental Impact Statement and appreciates the thorough assessment of our project’s potential impacts. We look forward to participating in the upcoming PUC hearings and are excited about the opportunities this project will create, including opening access to new markets for farmers and improving farm incomes.”
Summit’s project would take advantage of federal tax credits of $85 per ton of carbon dioxide that is sequestered.
The project has been delayed as Summit attempts to obtain the necessary permits. The North Dakota Public Service Commission rejected a permit application in 2023. A decision on a rehearing of that application is pending with the PSC. The North Dakota Industrial Commission also would need to issue a permit for the storage area.
A North Dakota environmental and property rights group, the Dakota Resource Council, held a rally in opposition to the pipeline Saturday in Bismarck.
A concern of some property owners is the potential use of eminent domain to force landowners to provide right-of-way for the pipeline. But under Minnesota law, eminent domain is not an option for Summit.
In July, Summit gained approval in Iowa but that decision is being appealed. South Dakota voters will weigh in on a pipeline-related property rights bill this fall.
Some property owners have expressed concerns about safety from a rupture of the hazardous liquid pipeline, effects on property values and damage to farmland.
The environmental report says that if the pipeline were to rupture, some nearby homes could have CO2 concentrations high enough to be immediately dangerous to life or health.
The report makes several comparisons to the pipeline rupture in Sataria, Mississippi, that sickened dozens of residents. It notes that the Mississippi rupture was caused by heavy rain and a landslide, but that the route area being studied is mostly flat.
The 28-mile section of pipeline in Minnesota would be just 4 inches in diameter. The Mississippi pipeline was 24 inches in diameter. The main branch of the Summit pipeline also would be 24 inches.
Summit has plans for another section of pipeline that would connect ethanol plants in west-central and southern Minnesota. It has not filed an application with the PUC for that area.
How the public can participate
The final environmental impact statement is available on the Minnesota Department of Commerce website.
The final EIS will also be available for viewing at the Breckenridge Public Library and Fergus Falls Public Library.
In-person public hearing
6 p.m. Aug. 20
Bigwood Event Center
925 Western Ave., Fergus Falls
Online hearing
6 p.m. Aug. 21
Join by WebEx link: https://minnesota.webex.com/minnesota/j.php?MTID=m44d038d6f1cefe2a665ec51b5f856c95
Webinar number: 2490 693 0888
Webinar password: MnPUC! (667820 when dialing from a phone or video system)
Evidentiary hearings
9:30 a.m. Aug. 22-23,
Minnesota Public Utilities Commission’s Small Hearing Room
121 7th Place E, Suite 350, St. Paul
Submit comments
Online: https://mn.gov/puc/consumers/public-comments
Email: [email protected]
Mail: Consumer Affairs Office
Minnesota Public Utilities Commission
121 7th Place E, Suite 350
St. Paul, MN 55101
PUC requests comments focus on three questions:
Is the final environmental impact statement adequate?
Should the commission grant the pipeline route permit?
If granted, what additional conditions or requirements should be considered?
This North Dakota Monitor article is republished online under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
Map: Summit Carbon Solutions plans to build a 2,000-mile network of CO2 pipelines across the Midwest to capture carbon produced by ethanol plants and then sequester it underground in North Dakota. About 28 miles would be in Minnesota. (Courtesy of Summit Carbon Solutions)
Related posts
- Referred pipeline law puts Summit Carbon Solution's permit quest in limbo
- Carbon capture news from elsewhere: New Illinois law lays out safety requirements for future carbon sequestration projects
- Broad array of groups object to Summit pipeline permit approval by Iowa Utilities Commission
- Iowa ethanol carbon pipeline opponents poised for Summit Carbon Solutions permit challenges
- Breaking crowded South Dakota ballot news: carbon pipeline law referendum validated
- Sustainable jet fuel company Gevo contributes $167K in defense of carbon pipeline law
- South Dakota Property Rights and Local Control Alliance turns in petitions to SD Secretary of State to force a vote on carbon pipeline policy
- News digest: District 1, the edge of the primary election political earthquake in South Dakota
- South Dakota District 1 GOP House primary news round-up: carbon pipeline politics major issue
- New Midwest battles brew over CO2 pipelines
- Company behind proposed Lake Preston jet fuel plant buoyed by federal carbon credit ruling
- Ethanol carbon pipeline news digest: Gevo aviation fuel needs Summit Carbon Solutions and more!
- ND GOP resolution against CCS pipelines decries "false premise of looming climate apocalypse
- Summit Carbon Solutions says ethanol carbon pipeline system won’t be operational until 2026
- Some Iowa landowners were confused by Summit Carbon Solution eminent domain process
- Navigator CO2 pulls its ethanol carbon pipeline permit application in Illinois
- Ethanol carbon pipeline news digest: Gevo aviation fuel needs Summit Carbon Solutions and more!
If you appreciate Bluestem Prairie, you can mail contributions (payable to Sally Jo Sorensen, 600 Maple Street, Summit SD 57266) or use the paypal button in the upper right hand corner of this post.
Or you can contribute via this link to paypal; use email [email protected] as recipient.
I'm on Venmo for those who prefer to use this service: @Sally-Sorensen-6
"This in-depth report raises critical questions about the adequacy of the environmental review for the Summit pipeline project. The concerns highlighted by CURE, especially regarding water resources and public safety, deserve serious attention. It's concerning that a project with such significant potential impacts on our land and communities might be moving forward without a comprehensive review. Public participation in the upcoming hearings is more important than ever to ensure that the voices of Minnesotans are heard."
Posted by: Haven | Aug 08, 2024 at 09:59 AM