Another development in the Summit Carbon Solutions ethanol carbon pipeline story, this time in Iowa.
From Iowa Capital Dispatch.
Summit begins outreach for expansion pipeline; both sides more informed this time around
by Cami KoonsSummit Carbon Solutions, the company planning to build a massive carbon sequestration pipeline through Iowa and surrounding states, spent the past several weeks in community information meetings around the state about its proposed expansion.
Affected landowners and folks in opposition to the project have attended the meetings too, many of them with long lists of questions and concerns for the Summit Carbon representatives.
The company followed the same process to get the initial project, comprising more than 680 miles of pipeline in Iowa alone, approved by the Iowa Utilities Commission in late August. This time around, however, landowners are more informed about the project, meaning both sides can move the conversation beyond just logistics.
“The first time we did this, it was a project introduction,” said Summit Carbon Director of Community Relations Sabrina Ahmed Zenor. “Now there’s a better understanding of the project, so we get to tell ‘the why’ a little more because ‘the how’ is understood.”
The meetings began Aug. 26, and concluded Sept. 20, with Summit and representatives from the Iowa Utilities Commission having visited the 23 counties that would be affected by the 330 additional miles of pipeline from the second phase.
Ahmed Zenor said the company is leaning into the community benefits of the project, and telling the stories of Iowa farmers and biorefineries. The company provided county specific slides at the meetings with estimated tax benefits from the project.
“We believe that we need to tell the story of the benefit this project brings, and that’s what we’re starting with across the board,” Ahmed Zenor said.
The expansion would connect the pipeline to an additional 17 biorefinery facilities in Iowa. The whole project, which would transport sequestered carbon from ethanol refinery plants to underground storage in North Dakota, would connect to a total of 57 refineries across five states.
Emma Schmit, the Pipeline Fighters director for Bold Alliance, said opponents to the pipeline are better placed to fight the expansion, because of all they learned from Summit Carbon’s presence over the past two and a half years.
“This is a fairly unfamiliar technology to the world, and so we were really just flying by the seat of our pants there for a while, but now we have been able to correct that,” Schmit said.
Schmit said the Bold Alliance strategy advocates for landowners to become educated about the project and to evaluate what is best for their families — though she hopes that means they refuse to sign an easement agreement.
“We’re here to help defend and protect and stand with landowners, not just stop pipelines,” Schmit said.
Summit Carbon can use eminent domain to get its remaining easements for phase one of the project, but cannot begin construction in Iowa until the project is approved in the Dakotas.
Following the informational meetings with the utilities commission, Summit Carbon can begin to survey the land and acquire voluntary easements for phase two of the project.
“That is always when people kind of come rushing to us,” Schmit said.
Land surveyors have permission to survey private land, provided they have given proper notice, but Schmit said landowners may deny access and require a court injunction. She urged landowners to follow the surveyor while they are on their property.
“Ask questions, take notes, all that good stuff,” Schmit said.
Schmit and Ahmed Zenor said the meetings have been well attended in the communities. Many community members and local officials have lined up at the microphone with lists of questions and complaints toward Summit Carbon.
“There’s definitely a lot of tension in those rooms,” Schmit said.
Landowners asked questions about water usage, pollution and who would be responsible if a leak occurred in the pipeline. Summit Carbon Solutions had team members from various departments available to answer questions and explain the project.
“We like to lead in fact, and we truly believe that once someone understands the facts, that we can reach a point of being able to have an open dialog,” Ahmed Zenor said.
“The point of these meetings is to introduce ourselves to the landowners who are within our corridor, and for them to understand their rights … We believe that is happening in a productive way.”
This Iowa Capital Dispatch article is republished online under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
Map: A map of the Summit Carbon Solutions pipeline through Iowa. The purple line represents the company’s expansion project. (Map courtesy of Summit Carbon Solutions, via Iowa Capita; Dispatch).
Related posts
- Ethanol carbon pipeline news: Attorneys differ on meaning of common carrier law in Summit case
- North Dakota Public Service Commission staff outlines legal option for landowners in Summit ethanol carbon pipeline fight
- Livestreaming today at 1:30, ND regulators to hold work session to discuss Summit pipeline
- Summit Carbon Solutions pipelines won’t capture all carbon emitted by ethanol plants
- Breaking news: Iowa Utilities Commission issues ethanol carbon pipeline permit for Summit Carbon Solutions
- Ethanol carbon news digest: Summit Carbon pipeline in MN, Iowa & North Dakota media
- South Dakota Supreme Court ruling complicates Summit Carbon Solution’s push for land
- Public can comment on Otter Tail – Wilkin Co section of ethanol carbon pipeline until Sept. 11
- Summit Carbon Solutions CEO asks for prayer, while MN PUC wants public comment on FEIS of Otter Tail – Wilkin portion of CO2 Pipeline
- More carbon pipeline news: Summit jumpstarts pipeline efforts with purchase of old land easement agreements in Iowa
- IA Rep. Miller-Meeks says carbon pipelines will help Iowa ethanol industry stay competitive
- VIDEO: Carbon capture in Minnesota: public lands, fast money, and pipe dreams
- Summit pipeline segment enters final permitting stages in Minnesota; CURE raises objections
- Referred pipeline law puts Summit Carbon Solution's permit quest in limbo
- Carbon capture news from elsewhere: New Illinois law lays out safety requirements for future carbon sequestration projects
- Broad array of groups object to Summit pipeline permit approval by Iowa Utilities Commission
- Iowa ethanol carbon pipeline opponents poised for Summit Carbon Solutions permit challenges
- Breaking crowded South Dakota ballot news: carbon pipeline law referendum validated
- Sustainable jet fuel company Gevo contributes $167K in defense of carbon pipeline law
- South Dakota Property Rights and Local Control Alliance turns in petitions to SD Secretary of State to force a vote on carbon pipeline policy
- News digest: District 1, the edge of the primary election political earthquake in South Dakota
- South Dakota District 1 GOP House primary news round-up: carbon pipeline politics major issue
- New Midwest battles brew over CO2 pipelines
- Company behind proposed Lake Preston jet fuel plant buoyed by federal carbon credit ruling
- Ethanol carbon pipeline news digest: Gevo aviation fuel needs Summit Carbon Solutions and more!
- ND GOP resolution against CCS pipelines decries "false premise of looming climate apocalypse
- Summit Carbon Solutions says ethanol carbon pipeline system won’t be operational until 2026
- Some Iowa landowners were confused by Summit Carbon Solution eminent domain process
- Navigator CO2 pulls its ethanol carbon pipeline permit application in Illinois
- Ethanol carbon pipeline news digest: Gevo aviation fuel needs Summit Carbon Solutions and more!
If you appreciate Bluestem Prairie, you can mail contributions (payable to Sally Jo Sorensen, 600 Maple Street, Summit SD 57266) or use the paypal button in the upper right hand corner of this post.
Or you can contribute via this link to paypal; use email [email protected] as recipient.
I'm on Venmo for those who prefer to use this service: @Sally-Sorensen-6
Comments