Just this morning I posted Coalition of 35 Christian clergy leaders endorse South Dakota reproductive-rights ballot measure.
It's last afternoon, and now there's another twist in the tale of the fight for reproductive rights in South Dakota, from the South Dakota Searchlight.
Trial for abortion ballot measure in limbo as court staff ‘not aware’ of planned start date
by Seth TupperThe trial date for a lawsuit against South Dakota’s abortion-rights ballot measure was not added to a court calendar, despite a signed order from a judge saying the trial would begin next week.
That leaves the date of the trial in limbo even as early and absentee voting will begin Friday.
Judge John Pekas signed a scheduling order on Aug. 9 saying the trial would take place during the week of Sept. 23 in Sioux Falls.
This week, Pekas emailed the parties in the case and said, without further explanation, “this matter must be scheduled through court administration” and “my schedule is filling up quickly.”
Minnehaha County Deputy Court Clerk Bryce Kummer was among the email recipients. He replied by asking how much time is needed for the trial and said if the parties could give him an idea, he could offer the next available options on the judge’s calendar.
Jim Leach, the lawyer for the abortion-rights side, responded with confusion, saying it was his understanding the trial would start Monday, Sept. 23. “Am I mistaken?” he wrote.
Kummer replied that he was “not aware of any trial being scheduled in this case.”
The lawyer for the anti-abortion side, Sara Frankenstein, filed a formal objection to moving the trial date. She also requested that if the trial date is moved, it should be scheduled in time to conclude before Election Day on Nov. 5.
Leslee Unruh is co-chair of the Life Defense Fund, which filed the lawsuit. She had no further information from the court as of Wednesday afternoon.
“We expected the trial to be held next week in accordance with the court’s scheduling order,” Unruh said in a statement. “We are waiting for further direction on how the court will proceed with our trial in recent light of the court’s scheduling conflicts.”
The lawsuit centers around allegations from the Life Defense Fund that petition circulators violated laws while gathering signatures to put the abortion-rights measure on the ballot. Life Defense Fund hopes to invalidate the measure, even though it’s too late to remove it from ballots.
The petition circulators worked for a group called Dakotans for Health, led by Rick Weiland.
“We are now just waiting to see what the court does next,” Weiland said.
Current state law bans abortions except when necessary to “preserve the life of the pregnant female.”
The ballot measure, Amendment G, would prohibit regulation of abortion during the first trimester. In the second trimester, regulations would be allowed if they are reasonably related to the pregnant woman’s physical health. During the third trimester, abortion could be regulated or prohibited, except when necessary to preserve the life or health of the woman, as determined by her physician’s medical judgment.
Honestly, this latest development almost makes me want to spell out the old folk expression "CF."
This South Dakota Searchlight article is republished online under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Photo: The Minnehaha County Courthouse in Sioux Falls, pictured on Nov. 1, 2022. (John Hult/South Dakota Searchlight)
Related posts
- Coalition of 35 Christian clergy leaders endorse South Dakota reproductive-rights ballot measure
- Update on SD rights: Abortion ballot measure challenge on course for late September trial
- South Dakota secretary of state now a defendant in Life Defense Fund abortion rights case
- Abortion rights measure likely to appear on South Dakota ballot, but lawsuit could affect election results
- South Dakota State Supreme Court revives legal challenge to abortion-rights ballot measure
- South Dakota father is leading effort to restore abortion rights in the state
- South Dakota doctors form group to support state abortion-rights ballot measure
- Anti-abortion group appeals judge's ruling on abortion rights amendment to SD Supreme Cour
- Reproductive rights update: former South Dakota legislator establishes Republican group to support abortion-rights amendment
- What's up with the lawsuit against South Dakota’s abortion-rights ballot measure
- Mifepristone ruling digest: SCOTUS rejects attempt to limit access to abortion pill; doesn't change South Dakota’s existing ban
- SD News Watch poll shows South Dakota abortion amendment holds nearly 20-point lead
- South Dakota's Republican Secretary of State Monae Johnson runs afoul of anti-abortion groups after labeling their phone calls a ‘scam’
- ACLU, Planned Parenthood North Central States, SD Justice Empowerment Network don’t support ballot measure aiming to restore abortion access
- At SD Democratic Party reproductive rights rally, Sioux Falls Rep. Duba shares her abortion story
- In South Dakota, where abortion is now outlawed, college students ramp up activism
- SD News Watch:SD women evade abortion ban by accessing medication in neighboring states
- View from the Coteau: a tale of two states in the wake of SCOTUS's Dobbs v. Jackson decision
- Abortion poll: Is South Dakota the next Kansas?
If you appreciate Bluestem Prairie, you can mail contributions (payable to Sally Jo Sorensen, 600 Maple Street, Summit SD 57266) or use the paypal button in the upper right hand corner of this post.
Or you can contribute via this link to paypal; use email [email protected] as recipient.
I'm also on Venmo for those who prefer to use this service: @Sally-Sorensen-6
Comments