More analysis of last minute funding in the battle to change South Dakota's extreme anti-abortion policy. As the South Dakota Searchlight's Joshua Haiar reports in the full article below:
The Concord Fund is closely tied to Leonard Leo. He’s a one-time Trump adviser who served as an executive of the Federalist Society, a conservative legal group that counts at least five U.S. Supreme Court justices as current or former members.
For more on Leonard Leo's role in American politics, I recommend ProPublica's 2023 article We Don’t Talk About Leonard: The Man Behind the Right’s Supreme Court Supermajority: The inside story of how Leonard Leo built a machine that remade the American legal system — and what he plans to do next.
From the South Dakota Searchlight.
Group opposing abortion-rights measure receives $500,000 from out-of-state nonprofit
by Joshua HaiarThe campaign opposing a South Dakota abortion-rights ballot measure received $500,000 from an out-of-state nonprofit and $100,000 from a Sioux Falls church, among other contributions still streaming in less than a week before Election Day.
Those contributions follow a $500,000 infusion to the abortion-rights side by another out-of-state group last week.
Michael Card, University of South Dakota associate professor emeritus in political science, said the last-minute fundraising reflects the high stakes and the unpredictable outcome. Polls indicate a close contest, but Card said many people are private about their feelings on abortion, so gauging public sentiment is difficult.
“Nobody knows what will happen, so these groups are likely willing to donate more than they might otherwise,” Card said. “And because of the national interest in the issue, more outside money will be coming in to influence this election.”
There are no limits on contributions to ballot question committees.
The latest $500,000 contribution came Wednesday to the No G for SD ballot question committee from The Concord Fund, in Virginia. It operates as a 501(c)(4), which is a type of nonprofit sometimes called a “dark money” organization, because it can participate in political campaigns without disclosing its donors. The fund’s 2023 public IRS filing said the group had $53 million in revenue.
According to Open Secrets, an organization that tracks money in politics, The Concord Fund is closely tied to Leonard Leo. He’s a one-time Trump adviser who served as an executive of the Federalist Society, a conservative legal group that counts at least five U.S. Supreme Court justices as current or former members.
Another $100,000 came to No G for SD on Tuesday from Celebrate Wesleyan Church of Sioux Falls. Other recent donations to the committee have included $25,000 from Republican South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem’s political action committee, Keeping Republican Ideas Strong Timely & Inventive, and $10,000 from Lt. Gov. Larry Rhoden’s campaign committee.
The recent fundraising brings the total amount raised against the ballot measure to more than $2 million since last spring, based on reports from several active ballot question committees.
It’s difficult to say how much has been raised in support of the measure, because the committee backing it, Dakotans for Health, is also supporting a measure that would repeal state sales taxes on groceries and is combining all of its campaign finance information. But the group’s latest reports say it’s raised more than $850,000 since its last report in May.
Abortion is currently banned in South Dakota, with one exception for abortions necessary to save the life of the mother. Amendment G would legalize abortion while allowing for restrictions in the second trimester of pregnancy and a ban in the third trimester, with mandatory exceptions to protect the life or health of the pregnant woman. The amendment is one of seven Nov. 5 ballot questions under consideration by South Dakota voters.
This South Dakota Searchlight article is republished online under under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
Photos: Above: A sign urging a vote against an abortion-rights ballot measure stands in a Sioux Falls neighborhood on Oct. 24, 2024. Below: A sign in Sioux Falls on Oct. 24, 2024, urges voters to support an abortion-rights ballot measure. (Makenzie Huber/South Dakota Searchlight).
Related posts
- Recreational pot laws in South Dakota: 1000s of charges, few harsh penalties imposed
- Cannabis on South Dakota ballot yet again with IM 29: if voters decriminalize marijuana, lawmakers would make the call on sales
- Marketing opportunity for Big Stone County? South Dakota News Watch Poll: South Dakota voters oppose recreational marijuana measure
- South Dakota cannabis legalization ballot measure validated for November 5 election
- South Dakotans return dope to governor's office, defeat legal pot, preserve Pierre's red swamp
- Bummer! South Dakota News Watch poll shows referendum on recreational cannabis legalization in South Dakota could fail in November
- After court defeat, South Dakotans for Better Marijuana Laws keeps working for adult cannabis
- SD Supreme Court strikes down legal cannabis; supporters vow to make the people rule
If you appreciate Bluestem Prairie, you can mail contributions (payable to Sally Jo Sorensen, 600 Maple Street, Summit SD 57266) or use the paypal button in the upper right hand corner of this post.
Or you can contribute via this link to paypal; use email [email protected] as recipient.
I'm on Venmo for those who prefer to use this service: @Sally-Sorensen-6
Comments