More ethanol carbon pipeline news from South Dakota.
From the South Dakota Searchlight.
Ban on eminent domain for carbon capture pipelines makes it out of SD committee
by Joshua HaiarSouth Dakota lawmakers endorsed a bill 10-3 on Friday in Pierre that would prohibit the use of eminent domain for carbon dioxide pipelines.
The vote occurred in a Capitol committee room packed with people interested in the issue. House Speaker Pro Tempore Karla Lems, R-Canton, who owns land near a proposed carbon pipeline route and introduced similar legislation during past sessions, is proposing the bill. She’s one of several lawmakers who campaigned against eminent domain for carbon pipelines and has since risen into leadership. The bill now heads to the full House of Representatives.
Eminent domain refers to the power to take private property for public use, with just compensation to the owner determined by a court.
“This is a power that can be lorded over landowners to threaten or coerce them into something that they would not normally do if they had the freedom to say ‘no thank you,’” Lems said.
The bill’s passage would be a major victory for pipeline opponents who have been rallying against the use of eminent domain for a $9 billion pipeline proposed by Iowa-based Summit Carbon Solutions. That project aims to transport some of the CO2 emitted by 57 ethanol plants in five states, including eastern South Dakota, to an underground storage site in North Dakota. The project would be eligible for billions in climate-change-related federal tax credits, for preventing the release of heat-trapping carbon into the atmosphere.
Supporters of the bill said Friday that carbon sequestration pipelines should not qualify for eminent domain because the product they transport — captured carbon dioxide — does not serve a public use like pipelines that carry water, electricity or natural gas. They said a South Dakota Supreme Court ruling that Summit’s project has failed to prove its eligibility for eminent domain is proof of their argument. That case was sent back to a lower court, where Summit is still attempting to prove its project qualifies for eminent domain.
“Eminent domain is a power that should only be reserved for the government or in the rare cases where it serves all of us,” said Jeremiah Murphy, lobbyist for the South Dakota Stockgrowers Association. “Because it is a phenomenal power.”
Opponents of the bill said blocking the pipeline comes with broader implications for the ethanol industry and the two-thirds of South Dakota corn that’s made into the gasoline additive. They said carbon capture technology is needed for ethanol to meet regulatory requirements in climate-change-concerned markets around the globe.
“Eminent domain pulls people to the table and gets them to start talking so that we can engage in the kind of conversations that can result in success,” said Brett Koenecke, lobbyist for Summit.
Pipeline supporters also said the state will lose out on a proposed sustainable aviation fuel plant near Lake Preston if the eminent domain bill passes. The company proposing that project, Gevo, has said it needs the carbon capture pipeline to meet its sustainability goals.
“I don’t think a state that changes rules like this is going to be strong when it comes to inviting investment,” said David Owen, lobbyist for the South Dakota Chamber of Commerce and Industry.
Neither Gov. Kristi Noem nor Lt. Gov. Larry Rhoden — who will take over for Noem if the U.S. Senate confirms her nomination as secretary of Homeland Security — have signaled whether they would sign the bill into law,
The committee vote
Photo: Attending a rally against a carbon dioxide pipeline on Jan. 13, 2025, at the South Dakota Capitol are, from left, state Rep. Brandei Schaefbauer, R-Aberdeen; former legislator Steven Haugaard; state Sen. Mark Lapka, R-Leola; state Rep. Julie Auch, R-Yankton; and state Rep. Karla Lems, R-Canton. (Joshua Haiar/South Dakota Searchlight).
This South Dakota Searchlight article is republished online under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
Related posts
- Carbon pipeline company asks court to force SD regulator’s recusal due to alleged conflict
- Summit Carbon Solutions pipeline company formally asks SD regulator to recuse herself
- South Dakota Public Utilities Commissioner stays on new carbon pipeline case after prior recusal, with no explanation this time
- Hundreds pack SD PUC Summit ethanol carbon pipeline hearings in Watertown and Aberdeen
- 100s attend first day of SD PUC ethanol carbon pipeline meetings in Mitchell and Sioux Falls
- Federal regulators announce proposed rule for CO2 pipeline safety
- Carbon pipeline opponents rallied Monday in Pierre amid push for eminent domain ban
- North Dakota landowners appeal Summit ethanol carbon storage decision
- Punt! Lincoln County commissioners push back decision on ethanol carbon pipeline rules
- Summit Carbon Solutions in the news: landowners & counties appeal North Dakota pipeline permit; Summit tells Iowans to cease & desist; Pipeline Fighters Hub & CURE statements
- North Dakota Industrial Commission approves CO2 storage for Summit ethanol carbon pipeline
- Minnesota PUC granted a permit for Summit Carbon Solutions Otter Tail to Wilkin County pipeline
- South Dakota Public Utilities Commission schedules public input meetings on Summit carbon pipeline application
- Summit ethanol CO2 injection wells up for approval but court appeal already in the works
- Oh the irony: ethanol carbon pipeline company has failed to address crossing concerns, DAPL oil pipeline company says
- Iowa Supreme Court upholds land survey abilities of pipeline companies in Summit case
- U.S. appeals court hears Summit pipeline case against Iowa's Shelby and Story counties
- Never mind the voters: ethanol carbon pipeline company reapplies for South Dakota permit
- Summit ethanol carbon pipeline news digest: Summit sues another Iowa county and more!
- North Dakota Public Service Commission approves Summit carbon pipeline route
- North Dakota couple plans to ‘dig in’ if Summit ethanol carbon pipeline is approved
- Summit ethanol carbon pipeline news digest: CO2 pipeline in MN moves forward; ND Public Service Commission decision coming Friday
- SD pipeline foes secure legislative leadership; MN Summit decision could come Dec. 12
- In unofficial results, ethanol carbon-pipeline law tossed out by South Dakota voters
- CURE: MN Administrative Law Judge’s report on Summit’s CO 2 pipeline expected November 4
- Seven South Dakota ballot measures, $7 million and counting: Reports reveal total spending
- Jeepers: ethanol coop kicks in another $400,000 to support carbon pipeline ballot question
- Ethanol carbon news digest: Summit Carbon pipeline in MN, Iowa & North Dakota media
- Summit Carbon Solutions CEO asks for prayer, while MN PUC wants public comment on FEIS of Otter Tail – Wilkin portion of CO2 Pipeline
- Public can comment on Otter Tail – Wilkin Co section of ethanol carbon pipeline until Sept. 11
- VIDEO: Carbon capture in Minnesota: public lands, fast money, and pipe dreams
- Summit pipeline segment enters final permitting stages in Minnesota; CURE raises objections
- Ethanol is fueling support of South Dakota carbon pipeline ballot measure
- Pipeline Fighters Hub: Summit Carbon Solutions numbers don’t add up in South Dakota
- Referred Law 21 & carbon pipelines: A landowner bill of rights or an undermining of local control
- Summit Carbon Solution's ethanol carbon pipeline takes #2 spot on Heatmap's The Most At-Risk Projects of The Energy Transition
- Ethanol carbon pipeline news: Attorneys differ on meaning of common carrier law in Summit case
- Summit Carbon Solutions pipelines won’t capture all carbon emitted by ethanol plants
- South Dakota Supreme Court ruling complicates Summit Carbon Solution’s push for land
- Referred pipeline law puts Summit Carbon Solution's permit quest in limbo
- Breaking crowded South Dakota ballot news: carbon pipeline law referendum validated
- Sustainable jet fuel company Gevo contributes $167K in defense of carbon pipeline law
- South Dakota Property Rights and Local Control Alliance turns in petitions to SD Secretary of State to force a vote on carbon pipeline policy
- South Dakota District 1 GOP House primary news round-up: carbon pipeline politics major issue
- New Midwest battles brew over CO2 pipelines
If you appreciate Bluestem Prairie, you can mail contributions (payable to Sally Jo Sorensen, 600 Maple Street, Summit SD 57266) or use the paypal button in the upper right hand corner of this post.
Or you can contribute via this link to paypal; use email [email protected] as recipient.
I'm on Venmo for those who prefer to use this service: @Sally-Sorensen-6
Comments