The platform on which I post Bluestem Prairie was offline until a few hours ago, so I'm catching up on news.
One story relates to the ongoing battle to govern ethanol carbon pipelines here in South Dakota.
From South Dakota Searchlight.
Carbon pipeline eminent domain ban advances to SD House; ‘compromise’ bill gutted
by Makenzie HuberPIERRE — South Dakota Senate Majority Leader Jim Mehlhaff – and a carbon dioxide pipeline proposal – took a political beating Monday morning at the Capitol.
The Pierre Republican watched the House State Affairs committee reject his legislation, which he described as a “compromise” on eminent domain use for pipelines, only to have the same committee revive the bill and amend it into an anti-eminent domain measure.
An hour later, more than 150 opponents of a controversial carbon pipeline murmured and laughed in agreement when he told the packed room during the Senate State Affairs Committee he’d “get run over” for opposing a ban on eminent domain for the project. A proposed ban advanced out of that legislative committee Monday.
“I’m going to stand tall all the way because I think it’s a terrible piece of legislation,” Mehlhaff said of the ban in an interview with South Dakota Searchlight.
Summit Carbon Solutions isn’t named in the legislation, but it came in response to the Iowa company’s proposed $9 billion, five-state pipeline that would pass through eastern South Dakota. It would collect carbon dioxide emitted by more than 50 ethanol plants and transport it for underground storage in North Dakota, to capitalize on federal tax credits incentivizing the prevention of heat-trapping emissions into the atmosphere.
Eminent domain ban on carbon pipelines passes committee
Mehlhaff was one of two votes against House Bill 1052 in the Senate State Affairs Committee on Monday morning. Sen. Arch Beal, R-Sioux Falls, also voted against the legislation, which would prohibit eminent domain use for carbon pipelines. Seven other committee members voted for the bill, which will head to the Senate floor next. It’s already passed the House of Representatives.
Eminent domain is a legal process for obtaining land access from unwilling landowners with just compensation determined by a court, for a project beneficial to the public — traditionally for projects such as electrical power lines, crude oil pipelines, water pipelines and highways.
A swarm of landowners clad in yellow testified in support of HB 1052, the latest in a string of bills targeting the carbon capture pipeline in the last several years. Sen. Mark Lapka, R-Leola, spoke as the prime sponsor for the bill. Lapka is a property owner, farmer and rancher. He said the bill wouldn’t kill the project but would simply prohibit it from using eminent domain to pressure landowners.
“Should eminent domain be a tool in my toolbelt used to enrich myself for my own wellbeing?” Lapka said. “I don’t think so.”
Lapka and other critics of the Summit pipeline proposal view its potential use of eminent domain as a threat to private property rights. Pipeline opponents also have concerns about potential leaks, which could result in toxic carbon dioxide plumes.
Mehlhaff and other opponents of the legislation said it would be a “kill shot” to the pipeline project and to the positive economic impact it would have on South Dakota, corn farmers and the ethanol industry.
Eminent domain ‘compromise’ bill killed, revived and amended
Banning eminent domain for pipelines is “the most important issue of the year,” said House Speaker Jon Hansen, R-Dell Rapids, when he suggested reviving and significantly amending Mehlhaff’s Senate Bill 198 after the House State Affairs Committee voted unanimously to defeat the bill.
The original legislation would have retained eminent domain as an option, but required entities using it to first attend mediation with the affected landowner and to also have a Public Utilities Commission permit before commencing eminent domain proceedings.
The amended version of the bill duplicates the language of HB 1052, the bill banning eminent domain for carbon pipelines.
Hansen anticipates “hostile, unfriendly” amendments to HB 1052 on the Senate floor. One amendment posted on the Legislative Research Council’s website would ban eminent domain for carbon pipelines unless a project obtains a permit from the Public Utilities Commission and over two-thirds of easements needed for the pipeline route.
“I’d like to have an ace in the hole just in case things go off the rails over there,” Hansen said.
The amendment passed 9-4.
Rep. Tim Reisch, R-Howard, opposed the amendment and called it a “bait and switch” maneuver, adding that Summit’s eligibility to use eminent domain is being litigated in state courts.
“I think this is just underhanded,” Reisch said. “This is not how we should be doing business in the people’s house.”
The committee plans to reconsider the amended bill on Wednesday, after the Senate decides the fate of HB 1052.
Other bills challenging the pipeline project are still alive in the Legislature, including a proposed moratorium on carbon pipelines until the completion of new federal safety standards, and a bill that would authorize lawsuits by landowners who allege they’ve suffered from deception, fraud, harassment, intimidation or misrepresentation by a land agent for a carbon pipeline company.
Photo: Supporters of House Bill 1052 dressed in yellow fill the South Dakota Senate State Affairs room before a committee hearing on March 3, 2025. (Makenzie Huber/South Dakota Searchlight).
This South Dakota Searchlight article is republished online under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
Related posts
- SD House: carbon capture pipeline moratorium and land-agent regulations advance, while environmental analysis bill fails
- SD lawmakers endorse hurdles for eminent domain, enviro studies for carbon pipelines
- CURE action alert: carbon pipelines & CCS not Minnesota's answer to a carbon free future
- Ethanol carbon capture pipeline news digest: stories from South Dakota--and The Atlantic
- Bill supports ND landowners caught in costly legal battles over eminent domain & easements
- State lawmakers vote down six bills to limit carbon capture in North Dakota
- Bill to kill carbon pipeline property tax exemption in North Dakota fails in state senate
- Iowa House GOP lawmakers introduce suite of pipeline bills on IUC, eminent domain issues
- Iowa House subcommittee advances bill to remove climate change language; aimed at stopping ethanol carbon pipeline
- Landowners, energy industry at odds over bills limiting ethanol CO2 pipelines in North Dakota
- Ban on eminent domain for carbon pipelines passes South Dakota House, heads to Senate
- Ethanol carbon pipeline bills set for hearings in North Dakota legislature this week
- Ban on eminent domain for carbon capture pipelines makes it out of SD House committee
- Carbon pipeline company asks court to force SD regulator’s recusal due to alleged conflict
- Summit Carbon Solutions pipeline company formally asks SD regulator to recuse herself
- South Dakota Public Utilities Commissioner stays on new carbon pipeline case after prior recusal, with no explanation this time
- Hundreds pack SD PUC Summit ethanol carbon pipeline hearings in Watertown and Aberdeen
- 100s attend first day of SD PUC ethanol carbon pipeline meetings in Mitchell and Sioux Falls
- Federal regulators announce proposed rule for CO2 pipeline safety
- Carbon pipeline opponents rallied Monday in Pierre amid push for eminent domain ban
- North Dakota landowners appeal Summit ethanol carbon storage decision
- Punt! Lincoln County commissioners push back decision on ethanol carbon pipeline rules
- Summit Carbon Solutions in the news: landowners & counties appeal North Dakota pipeline permit; Summit tells Iowans to cease & desist; Pipeline Fighters Hub & CURE statements
- North Dakota Industrial Commission approves CO2 storage for Summit ethanol carbon pipeline
- Minnesota PUC granted a permit for Summit Carbon Solutions Otter Tail to Wilkin County pipeline
- South Dakota Public Utilities Commission schedules public input meetings on Summit carbon pipeline application
- Summit ethanol CO2 injection wells up for approval but court appeal already in the works
- Oh the irony: ethanol carbon pipeline company has failed to address crossing concerns, DAPL oil pipeline company says
- Iowa Supreme Court upholds land survey abilities of pipeline companies in Summit case
- U.S. appeals court hears Summit pipeline case against Iowa's Shelby and Story counties
- Never mind the voters: ethanol carbon pipeline company reapplies for South Dakota permit
- Summit ethanol carbon pipeline news digest: Summit sues another Iowa county and more!
- North Dakota Public Service Commission approves Summit carbon pipeline route
- North Dakota couple plans to ‘dig in’ if Summit ethanol carbon pipeline is approved
- Summit ethanol carbon pipeline news digest: CO2 pipeline in MN moves forward; ND Public Service Commission decision coming Friday
- SD pipeline foes secure legislative leadership; MN Summit decision could come Dec. 12
- In unofficial results, ethanol carbon-pipeline law tossed out by South Dakota voters
- CURE: MN Administrative Law Judge’s report on Summit’s CO 2 pipeline expected November 4
- Seven South Dakota ballot measures, $7 million and counting: Reports reveal total spending
- Jeepers: ethanol coop kicks in another $400,000 to support carbon pipeline ballot question
- Ethanol carbon news digest: Summit Carbon pipeline in MN, Iowa & North Dakota media
- Summit Carbon Solutions CEO asks for prayer, while MN PUC wants public comment on FEIS of Otter Tail – Wilkin portion of CO2 Pipeline
- Public can comment on Otter Tail – Wilkin Co section of ethanol carbon pipeline until Sept. 11
- VIDEO: Carbon capture in Minnesota: public lands, fast money, and pipe dreams
- Summit pipeline segment enters final permitting stages in Minnesota; CURE raises objections
- Ethanol is fueling support of South Dakota carbon pipeline ballot measure
- Pipeline Fighters Hub: Summit Carbon Solutions numbers don’t add up in South Dakota
- Referred Law 21 & carbon pipelines: A landowner bill of rights or an undermining of local control
- Summit Carbon Solution's ethanol carbon pipeline takes #2 spot on Heatmap's The Most At-Risk Projects of The Energy Transition
- Ethanol carbon pipeline news: Attorneys differ on meaning of common carrier law in Summit case
- Summit Carbon Solutions pipelines won’t capture all carbon emitted by ethanol plants
- South Dakota Supreme Court ruling complicates Summit Carbon Solution’s push for land
- Referred pipeline law puts Summit Carbon Solution's permit quest in limbo
- Breaking crowded South Dakota ballot news: carbon pipeline law referendum validated
- Sustainable jet fuel company Gevo contributes $167K in defense of carbon pipeline law
- South Dakota Property Rights and Local Control Alliance turns in petitions to SD Secretary of State to force a vote on carbon pipeline policy
- South Dakota District 1 GOP House primary news round-up: carbon pipeline politics major issue
- New Midwest battles brew over CO2 pipelines
If you appreciate Bluestem Prairie, you can mail contributions (payable to Sally Jo Sorensen, 600 Maple Street, Summit SD 57266) or use the paypal button in the upper right hand corner of this post.
Or you can contribute via this link to paypal; use email [email protected] as recipient.
I'm on Venmo for those who prefer to use this service: @Sally-Sorensen-6
Comments